A new study by Indiana University media researchers finds that Fox News host Bill Oâ€™Reilly calls â€œa person or a group a derogatory name once every 6.8 seconds, on average, or nearly nine times every minute during the editorials that open his program each night.â€
The study documented six months worth, or 115 episodes, of Oâ€™Reillyâ€™s â€œTalking Points Memoâ€ editorials â€œusing propaganda analysis techniques made popular after World War I.â€ Researchers found that Oâ€™Reilly â€œwas prone to inject fear into his commentaries and quick to resort to name-calling. He also frequently assigned roles or attributes â€” such as â€˜villiansâ€™ or downright â€˜evilâ€™ â€” to people and groups.
Some findings from the study:
â€“ Fear was used in more than half (52.4 percent) of the commentaries, and Oâ€™Reilly almost never offered a resolution to the threat. For example, in a commentary on â€œleft-wingâ€ media unfairly criticizing Attorney Gen. Alberto Gonzales for his role in the Abu Ghraib scandal, Oâ€™Reilly considered this an example of America â€œslowly losing freedom and core values,â€ and added, â€œSo what can be done? Unfortunately, not much.â€
â€“ The researchers identified 22 groups of people that Oâ€™Reilly referenced in his commentaries, and while all 22 were described by Oâ€™Reilly as bad at some point, the people and groups most frequently labeled bad were the political left â€” Americans as a group and the media (except those media considered by Oâ€™Reilly to be on the right).
â€“ Left-leaning media (21.6 percent) made up the largest portion of bad people/groups, and media without a clear political leaning was the second largest (12.2 percent). When it came to evil people and groups, illegal aliens (26.8 percent) and terrorists (21.4 percent) were the largest groups.
The techniques used by Indiana University researchers to study Oâ€™Reilly were also â€œused during the late 1930s to study another prominent voice in a war-era, Father Charles Coughlin. His sermons evolved into a darker message of anti-Semitism and fascism, and he became a defender of Hitler and Mussolini.â€ The researchers note, â€œOâ€™Reilly is a heavier and less-nuanced user of the propaganda devices than Coughlin.â€