
the thread where this came from
I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.
SCS voting guide via Phatt
FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.
FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.
FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE
Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.
FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE
Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.
FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.
County Commisioner
I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.
FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX
I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.
FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE
Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).
Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups
The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.
Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.
Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund
This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.
Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs
This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.
Sure.
Amendment 4: Probation and Parole
The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.
This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.
Amendment 5: Early childhood education
This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.
The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.
Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.
This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.
Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements
This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.
Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.
This link explains this Amendments well.
http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt
Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.
If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…
I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.
Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.
Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.
Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.
This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.
No tags

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
« Previous 1 … 3,830 3,831 3,832 3,833 3,834 … 3,865 Next »Kennethdot · 09/07/2026 at 12:10 PM
I usually skim posts like these but this one held my attention all the way through, and a stop at prenvia did the same, that is a strong endorsement coming from me because I am usually quick to bounce when content gets repetitive or fails to deliver on its initial promise made in the headline.
Averyomilk · 09/07/2026 at 12:13 PM
Reading this on a long flight and finding it the best thing I read across hours of trying, and a stop at dollyn kept the streak going, when content beats long flight reading you know it has substance because flight reading is a hard test of a piece given the alternatives available everywhere.
Kapelnica ot pohmelya_jjer · 09/07/2026 at 12:14 PM
?? ????? ???????, ?? ??? ??????, ?? ??? ????. ?? ?????? ?? ????????, ??? ??????????? ?????? ????. ????????, ???????? ????????, ? ??? ???????: «???????? ????? ???». ???????? ???????????? ? ?????????? — ??? ??????? ????? ? ?????????? ?????????. ???? ???????, ???????? ?????, ???????? ??????????. ???? ????????? ?????? ????????. ????????? ?? ???? ???????? [url=https://detoks.kapelnicza-ot-pokhmelya-krasnodar.ru]https://detoks.kapelnicza-ot-pokhmelya-krasnodar.ru[/url] ?????????, ??????????, ?? ????????? ??? ?????? ??????. ?????? ??? ?? ?????. ?????????? ?? ???????? — ??? ???????? ??????, ??????? ????????!
AlfredoHit · 09/07/2026 at 12:15 PM
Worth flagging that the post handled an angle of the topic I had not seen elsewhere, and a look at zenvorax extended that fresh treatment, content that finds underexplored corners of well covered subjects is genuinely valuable and this site has demonstrated that exploratory editorial approach across multiple pieces in my reading sessions today.
Timmythoup · 09/07/2026 at 12:16 PM
Now wishing more sites covered topics with this level of care, and a look at moonvendorcorner extended that wish across more subjects, the rarity of careful coverage on most topics is a problem and this site is one of the small antidotes to that broader pattern of casual or surface treatment of complex subjects.
Yalesoxia · 09/07/2026 at 12:17 PM
My professional context would benefit from having this kind of resource available, and a look at xyloshop extended the professional applicability, the rare site that contributes meaningfully to professional work rather than just personal interest is content with multiplied value and this one is providing that professional utility consistently across multiple pieces.
Kennethdot · 09/07/2026 at 12:17 PM
A genuine compliment to the writer for keeping the post focused on what mattered, and a look at prenvia continued that disciplined focus, focus is a editorial choice that compounds across many small decisions and this site has clearly made those small decisions consistently across what I have read so far this week here.
GermanEmicy · 09/07/2026 at 12:18 PM
Now feeling confident enough in this site to use it as a reference point for evaluating others on the same topic, and a look at mossvendorhouse continued the comparison friendly quality, sites that serve as quality benchmarks for their topic are precious and this one has clearly become a benchmark for me on this particular subject area.
RudolphMex · 09/07/2026 at 12:18 PM
????? ?? ????? ? ??????????? ?????????, ????? ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ??? ???????? ?????????? ?????????, ????????? ???, ???????, ???????? ? ?????? ?????????? ????????????? ????????. ???????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????????? ?????????? ?????, ? ????????? ?????? ???????? ???? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ? ???????????? ???????????. ? ????? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ????? ????????? ????????, ??????? ????????? ?????????? ? ??????? ?????????? ?????? ???????. ???????? ????? ???????? ?? ??? ???? ??????? ???????? ? ??????? ???????????, ???? ????????? ????? ??????????????? ??????????.
????????? – [url=https://1.vyvod-iz-zapoya-krasnoyarsk55.ru/]http://1.vyvod-iz-zapoya-krasnoyarsk55.ru[/url]
Russelldiami · 09/07/2026 at 12:19 PM
Thanks for the breakdown, it gave me a clearer picture of something I had been confused about for a while now, and a stop at dailuno closed the remaining gaps in my understanding nicely, no need to hunt around twenty other articles to put the pieces together which is a real time saver.
98WIN · 09/07/2026 at 12:21 PM
I don’t even know how I finished up right here, however I believed this submit
used to be good. I don’t know who you might be however definitely you are going to a well-known blogger in case you
are not already. Cheers!
Betting for epsom derby? · 09/07/2026 at 12:24 PM
horse racing Betting for epsom derby? odds saturday?
LonnieGom · 09/07/2026 at 12:24 PM
Reading this gave me a small framework I expect to use going forward, and a stop at shorelinesupply extended that framework, content that produces transferable mental models rather than just specific facts is content with multiplicative value and this site is providing those models at a rate that justifies extra attention from me regularly.
Willishem · 09/07/2026 at 12:25 PM
A piece that did not require external context to follow, and a look at awardatelier maintained the same self contained quality, content that stands alone without forcing readers to chase prerequisites is more accessible and this site has clearly thought about how each piece can serve a fresh visitor rather than only existing members.
Vivod iz zapoya na domy_ysoi · 09/07/2026 at 12:26 PM
????? ? ??????, ??? ??? ???? ????? ?? ??????, ?? ????????. ? ??? ? ????????, ?? ????, ??? ??????. ????????, ???????? ????????, ? ??? ???????: «??????? ????? ???». ????? ????????? ? ??????? — ??? ???? ??? ?????? ????. ???????? ??????????, ???? ?????? ?????????. ???? ????? ????????? ????. ?????? ?? ????? ?????? [url=https://detoks.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-moskva-svi.ru]?????? ?? ????? ??????[/url] ??????????, ???? ???????? ???? ??? ?????????? ???????. ???????, ?????????, ????????. ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!
Narkologicheskaya klinika_lomt · 09/07/2026 at 12:26 PM
????? ????? ?????????? ??????? ?????, ? ?? ????????????. ?? ??????: ??? ??? ?? ?????? «????», ??? ???????. ? ??????? ??, ??? ????? ??????? ?? ? ?????????, ? ? ?????. ???????????? ????????? — ??? ???? ???????, ??????? ?????? ?????. ??? ??? ??????????? ??????, ??????? ? ???????????. ?? ????? ????? ???????? ? ???????? ??????. ??????? ??????????????? ?????? ?????? [url=https://alkogolizm.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-volgograde17.ru]https://alkogolizm.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-volgograde17.ru[/url] ??? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ?????? ??????. ?? ?????, ???? ?????? ??????. ??????????????? ??????? — ??? ???????? ??????? ????????!
BlakeBix · 09/07/2026 at 12:28 PM
Got pulled in by the headline and stayed because the content actually delivered on the promise, and a stop at flintvendorhouse kept that trust intact, when a site lives up to its own framing it earns the right to keep showing up in my browser tabs going forward indefinitely from here on out really.
CliftonCek · 09/07/2026 at 12:30 PM
??????????????? ?????? ?? ???? ???????????? ? ?????????, ????? ????????? ?? ????? ?????????????? ????? ? ??????????? ????? ???? ????? ????????? ?????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????. ? ??????????? ????? ????????? ?? ??? ????? ???? ??????????? ?????????????, ??????? ???????? ? ??????????. ??? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ?????, ???????, ???????? ???????????? ????????, ???????????? ????? ? ????????? ???????????. ??? ?????????? ???????? ??????????? ?????????? ???? ?????? ? ????????????? ? ??????.
?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://1.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/]http://1.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/[/url]
CalebVioda · 09/07/2026 at 12:32 PM
Picked this for my morning read because the topic seemed worth the time, and a look at morningmoment confirmed the choice was right, my morning reading slot is precious and giving it to this site felt like a good investment rather than a waste which is a higher endorsement than I usually offer for content.
LawrenceNed · 09/07/2026 at 12:35 PM
If I were to recommend a starting point for the topic this site would be near the top of my list, and a stop at whimvendor reinforced that recommendation status, the small list of starting point recommendations I keep for friends asking about topics is short and this site is now firmly on it.
RaulKnori · 09/07/2026 at 12:38 PM
Solid endorsement from me, the writing earns it, and a look at dyeandwash continues to earn it across the broader site too, the kind of operation that maintains quality across many pages rather than just one viral post is a sign of serious commitment and that is what I see here clearly across what I read.
LonnieGom · 09/07/2026 at 12:40 PM
Thanks again for the post, I learned a couple of things I can actually use later this week, and after I went over shorelinesupply the rest of the site looked equally promising, definitely going to spend more time here when I get a free moment over the weekend to read more carefully.
Yalesoxia · 09/07/2026 at 12:41 PM
Adding this site to my regular reading list, the post earned that on its own, and a quick stop at xyloshop sealed the decision, the kind of place worth checking back with from time to time because it consistently produces material that holds up against a critical reading too which I really value.
Newcastle Casino promos · 09/07/2026 at 12:41 PM
milwausaee wisconsin casino, united kingdom Newcastle Casino promos guide
and pokies real money australia, or australia gambling sites
StephenTrugh · 09/07/2026 at 12:45 PM
Honestly the simplicity is what makes this work, the topic is not buried under filler words or overly complex examples, and a quick look at woodmarket showed the same sensible style, I left with what I came for and no headache from over reading which is a real win these days.
quinault casino entertainment · 09/07/2026 at 12:45 PM
online uk bingo reviews, grand dusae quinault casino entertainment no deposit bonus and united kingdom online pokies
2021, or slots frenzy
JosephAnokS · 09/07/2026 at 12:45 PM
?????? ????? ???????? ????????, ? ?????????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????.
?????? ?????? – https://5.vyvod-iz-zapoya-krasnoyarsk55.ru/
CarrollDeevy · 09/07/2026 at 12:46 PM
???????? ??? ????????? ? ????????, ???????? ????????? ????????? ??? ???????? ? ?????.
?????? ?????? – [url=https://3.vyvod-iz-zapoya-krasnoyarsk55.ru/]????? ?? ????? ?????????????[/url]
Dominiclilia · 09/07/2026 at 12:46 PM
Will recommend this to a couple of friends who have been asking about this exact topic, and after wheatwarehouse I have even more reason to do so, the kind of site that earns word of mouth rather than chasing it through aggressive marketing or paid placements is always a treat to find online.
LonnieGom · 09/07/2026 at 12:47 PM
Reading this felt productive in a way most internet reading does not, and a look at shorelinesupply continued that productive feeling, sometimes the open web feels like a waste of time but sites like this remind me why I still bother to look around rather than retreating to old reliable sources for everything I need.
Kennethdot · 09/07/2026 at 12:48 PM
A clear case of writing that does not try to do too much in one post, and a look at prenvia maintained the same scoped discipline, posts that try to cover too much end up covering nothing well and this site has clearly chosen scope discipline as a core editorial principle which shows up clearly in what I read.
Ernesturift · 09/07/2026 at 12:48 PM
????????? ???????? ????????????? ?? ?????? ?????, ?? ????????? ???????????? ?? ?????????? ????????????.
????????? – [url=https://5.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/]??????? ??????????????? ??????? ??????????[/url]
Narkologicheskaya klinika_cuml · 09/07/2026 at 12:50 PM
?? ?????? — ??? ?? ?????? «?????? ??????», ??? ???????. ?? ??? ????? ??? ?????????, ???????? ????, ???????? ?????. ?? ?? ???????? ????? ? ?????. ??????????????? ??????? — ??? ??????? ???? ? ?????. ? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ??????? ?????????. ?? ????? ????? ??????. ?????????? ?????????????? [url=https://zapoy.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-volgograde017.ru]https://zapoy.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-volgograde017.ru[/url] ?? ?????? — ????????? ?????????? ??? ??? ??????. ?? ?????, ???? ?????? ??????. ??????????????? ??????? — ??? ???????? ??????? ????????!
AlfredoHit · 09/07/2026 at 12:51 PM
Worth flagging that the post handled an angle of the topic I had not seen elsewhere, and a look at zenvorax extended that fresh treatment, content that finds underexplored corners of well covered subjects is genuinely valuable and this site has demonstrated that exploratory editorial approach across multiple pieces in my reading sessions today.
Joshuaalure · 09/07/2026 at 12:54 PM
polymarket jesus return
Maxwelldub · 09/07/2026 at 12:54 PM
If you asked me to point to a recent positive sign for the open web this site would be near the top, and a stop at woodlandvault reinforced that designation, the few sites that serve as evidence the web can still produce quality independent content are precious and this one has clearly become one for me.
Issacgox · 09/07/2026 at 12:55 PM
Took the time to read every paragraph rather than skimming for the punchline, and a quick visit to sunvendor earned the same careful attention from me, that is the highest signal I can give about content quality because my default mode is rapid scanning rather than deliberate reading on most pages.
LonnieGom · 09/07/2026 at 12:56 PM
Decent post that improved my afternoon a small amount, and a look at shorelinesupply added a bit more to that, sometimes the small wins online add up over time and a useful site like this one is the kind of place that contributes consistently to those small wins for me lately across many different topics I follow.
11WIN · 09/07/2026 at 12:56 PM
Hello, i believe that i saw you visited my website so i got here to go back the favor?.I’m
trying to find issues to improve my site!I guess its good
enough to use a few of your ideas!!
paedophile · 09/07/2026 at 12:57 PM
It’s difficult to find knowledgeable people in this particular topic,
but you seem like you know what you’re talking about!
Thanks
LawrenceNed · 09/07/2026 at 12:59 PM
Closed the tab and immediately reopened it ten minutes later because I wanted to reread a part, and a stop at whimvendor drew the same return, content that pulls you back after closing it is doing something well beyond the average and worth marking as exceptional in my mental catalogue of reliable sites.
Vivod iz zapoya na domy_sspr · 09/07/2026 at 1:00 PM
????? ??? ????? ???? ???????, ? ???? ????????. ? ??? ? ????????, ?? ????, ??? ??????. ???????? ????????? ?? ????, ??? ?????????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ????. ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? ???? — ??? ??????? ????? ? ?????. ???????? ??????????, ???? ?????? ?????????. ????????, ??? ?????, ??? ?????? ????????. ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? [url=https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-moskva-svi.ru]https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-moskva-svi.ru[/url] ?? ?????? — ????????? ?????????? ??? ???????. ???????, ?????????, ????????. ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!
GermanEmicy · 09/07/2026 at 1:01 PM
Glad the writer did not feel compelled to cover every possible angle of the topic, focus is a virtue, and a stop at mossvendorhouse reflected the same disciplined scope, knowing what to leave out is half of what makes good writing good and this post has clearly been edited with that principle in mind.
AndreErown · 09/07/2026 at 1:02 PM
????? ?????????? ????????? ??????????? ???? ????????? ???????? ? ???? ???????????? ?? ??????????? ???????. ????? ????????, ??? ??????????, ??????????????? ?????? ???????????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????????, ?? ??? ?????? ? ????? ???????????? ????????? ????? ?????? ????. ??????? ??????????????? ?????? ????? ???????????? ? ???????????? ???????, ? ?????????? ??? ? ???????????????? ?????????.
???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://5.narkologicheskaya-klinika-moskva11.ru/]narkologicheskaya-moskva[/url]
DavidViesy · 09/07/2026 at 1:02 PM
????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???????? ????????? ?? ??????????? ????????????, ????? ??? ????????? ???????? ???????, ???????, ?????????? ????????? ??????????????? ? ?????? ?????????, ????????? ??????????. ??? ????????? ???????? ??????? ? ????????? ?????????? ? ????????? ??????????????????. ???????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????, ???????? ??????, ???????? ?????? ?? ???????????? ???????? ? ????????????, ????? ????????? ???????. ???????? ????? ????? ?? ????????; ??? ????????? ?????? ????? ???????? ???????????? ?????, ???????, ???????? ???????? ? ?????????, ??????? ??????? ??? ????????.
???????? ?????? ?????????? – https://4.vyvod-iz-zapoya-moskva011.ru/
medical spa supplies · 09/07/2026 at 1:02 PM
I think this is one of the most vital info for me. And i’m glad reading your article.
But wanna remark on few general things, The website style is
great, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers
Russelldiami · 09/07/2026 at 1:07 PM
Honestly enjoyed every minute spent here, that is not something I say lightly, and a look at dailuno confirmed I will be back, the bar for spending time online is high for me these days but this site clears it without effort which is high praise indeed from this reader who is usually rather demanding.
Jerryrok · 09/07/2026 at 1:09 PM
Picked this for a morning recommendation in our company chat, and a look at uplandvendor suggested I will mention this site again later, recommending content into a workplace context is a small editorial act that requires confidence in the recommendation and this site is making me confident in those recommendations consistently here too.
Isaacexicy · 09/07/2026 at 1:10 PM
Now feeling that this site is the kind I want to make sure does not disappear, and a look at farniq reinforced that quiet protective feeling, the rare sites whose disappearance would actually matter to me are the sites I want to support through return visits and recommendations and this one has joined that small protected list.
Vivod iz zapoya na domy_thpr · 09/07/2026 at 1:10 PM
????? ??? ????? ???? ???????, ? ???? ????????. ?? ???????? ??????? ? ??????, ?? ??? ???????: «?????? ???? ?? ??? ???????». ???????? ????????? ?? ????, ??? ?????????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ????. ??????? ???????????? — ??? ??????? ????? ? ?????. ???? ???????, ???????? ???. ?? ????????????, ? ???? ?????. ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? ? ??????? [url=https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-moskva-svi.ru]https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-moskva-svi.ru[/url] ?????????, ??????????, ?? ????????? ??? ???????. ?????? ??? ?? ?????. ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!