Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

190,693 comments

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 6:21 AM

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 6:21 AM

  • CesarCar · 09/05/2026 at 6:21 AM

    Solid value packed into a relatively short post, that takes skill, and a look at tagtides continues the dense useful content across more pages, this site clearly understands that respecting reader time is itself a form of generosity which is something most blog operations seem to have forgotten lately across the wider open web.

  • Pereplanirovka kvartir_xuEl · 09/05/2026 at 6:22 AM

    ?????? ?????? ? ???????? — ? ??? ??????????, ??? ?????? ??? ????? ?? ????????. ?? ????? ????????? ?? ????????, ??????? ?????????? ???????????????? ? ??????. ??????? ??????, ??????????? ?????????. ???????????? ?????????????? ? ?????? — ??? ??????? ??? ??? ????. ????? ?????? ?????? ? ?? ??????? ???????. ?? ????????? ???? — ?????????? ??????????????. ?????????? ?? ?????????????? ???????? [url=https://progorod59.ru/interesnoe/view/soglasovanie-proekta-pereplanirovki-kvartiry-trebovania-k-inzenernoj-dokumentacii-i-shemam]?????????? ?? ?????????????? ????????[/url] ?????????, ??????????, ?? ????????? ??? ???????. ?????? ??????? ?????????????? ??? ???????? ???? — ??????????? ? ????????????. ???????? ?????? ????????? — ??? ?????? ? ???????!

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 6:23 AM

  • blok_pitan_dhot · 09/05/2026 at 6:24 AM

    ??????? ?? [url=https://blok-pitaniya-i-led-lenti.netlify.app/]??????? ?????? ???????? ??? ???????????[/url], ??? ?????????? ???? ??????? ?? LED-???????? ? ??? ????????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ??? ???????????? ?????.
    ????? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ????????? ? ???????????????? ?????? ???????????? ?? ?????.

    ### ?????? 2. ????? ????????????

    ??? ??????????? ?????? ?????? ????????, ????????? ???????? ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????.

    ### ?????? 3. ??????????? ? ????????????

    ??????????? ??????????? ?????????? ????? ??????? ? ????????????? ??? ?????? ?????????? ?????.

    ### ?????? 4. ???????????? ?????? ?????

    ????????????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ????? ??? ??????????????? ??????? ?????????.

  • SamuelKab · 09/05/2026 at 6:24 AM

    Reading this on a difficult day was a small bright spot, and a stop at screenprintshop extended that brightness, content that improves a hard day is content that has earned a particular kind of place in my reading habits and this site is occupying that uplifting role for me today which I appreciate clearly.

  • Jacoblab · 09/05/2026 at 6:25 AM

    ? ??????? ???????? ???? ? ?????? ?????? ???????????. ???? ??????? ?????????? ????? ??????? ??????????? ?????, ?????? ???????? ????????? ??? ? ??? ???????? ???????. ?????? ???????????? ???????? ????? ??? ??????? ???????? ?? ???????, ????????? ??? ?????????? ???????? ?????????????????? ?????? ?? ???????. ???????? ????????? ???????????? ???????? ? ????????????? ???????, ??????? ??????????? ???????????, ?????????????? ???????? ? ??????????? ????????? ????????????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://1.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ??????????[/url]

  • ScottPag · 09/05/2026 at 6:26 AM

    ????? ????????? ????? ???? ?????????? ????????? ??? ?????????? ????????, ??????????? ??????? ? ?????????? ????????? ??????? ?????????, ?????????? ?????????? ??????????????. ?????????? ????????? ???????????? ?????, ?????????? ????????, ??????????? ???????, ???????, ?????????, ??????? ??????? ??? ????????, ? ??????? ?????????? ??????????. ????? ?????????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??????????? ???????, ? ?? ???????????? ?????????? ??????????? ????? ??? ???????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://2.narcolog-na-dom-ekaterinburg0.ru/]????? ????????? ?? ???[/url]

  • Ericknop · 09/05/2026 at 6:26 AM

    Decided not to skim despite my usual habit and was rewarded for the discipline, and a stop at makermerchant earned the same patient approach, training myself to recognise sites that warrant slower reading is part of being a careful online reader and this site is the kind that helps me practice that skill regularly.

  • JesusHefly · 09/05/2026 at 6:29 AM

    Most attempts at writing on this topic feel like they are missing something and this post finally identified what was missing, and a look at apexware extended that diagnostic clarity, content that names what is wrong with adjacent treatments while doing better itself is content with both critical and constructive value and this site has both.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 6:30 AM

  • AlfredZoofs · 09/05/2026 at 6:32 AM

    ??????? ??????????? ? ??????? ?????????? ??????? ?????????? ???????????? ???????. ? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????????????? ????? ??????????. ??????????????? ????????? ????? ???????? ????????????, ??????????????? ???????, ???????????, ???????????? ?????????, ???????????? ? ????????????. ???????? ???????????? ?? ?????? ??????, ????? ??????? ???? ???????????????? ? ??????????????? ??????????? ???????.
    ?????? ?????? – https://2.narkologicheskaya-klinika-moskva11.ru/

  • RustyFer · 09/05/2026 at 6:33 AM

    Probably worth setting aside a longer block to read more carefully than I can right now, and a stop at zestycrate confirmed the longer block plan, the impulse to schedule dedicated time for a sites archive is itself a measure of trust and this site has earned that scheduling impulse from me clearly today actually.

  • Goodinimer · 09/05/2026 at 6:33 AM

    ?????? ???????? ????????? ??????????, ????????? ????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ??????? ?????????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://6.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/]www.6.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru[/url]

  • Sergioteala · 09/05/2026 at 6:37 AM

    Now adding this to a list of sites I want to see flourish, and a stop at seosignal reinforced that wish, the few sites I actively root for are sites that produce the kind of work I want more of in the world and this one has joined that small list based on what I have read so far.

  • JorgeLef · 09/05/2026 at 6:38 AM

    Did not expect much when I clicked through but ended up reading the whole thing carefully, and a stop at stockstack kept that engagement going, sometimes the unassuming sites turn out to deliver more than the flashy ones which is something I have learned to look out for over time online lately and across topics.

  • PedroMum · 09/05/2026 at 6:39 AM

    The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at cleaircove kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 6:39 AM

  • RustyFer · 09/05/2026 at 6:39 AM

    Decided I would read the archives over the weekend, and a stop at zestycrate confirmed that the archives would be worth the time, very few sites have archives I would actively read through but this one has earned that level of interest based on the consistent quality across what I have sampled so far.

  • Ericknop · 09/05/2026 at 6:39 AM

    Now wondering how the writers calibrated the level of detail so well, and a stop at makermerchant continued the same calibration, the right level of detail is one of the harder editorial calls in any piece and this site has clearly developed an instinct for it through what I assume is years of careful practice publicly.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 6:41 AM

  • Richarddal · 09/05/2026 at 6:41 AM

    ??????? ????????? ????? ???? ???????. ?????? ???????? ????????? ????? ?? ????? ? ??????????, ??????? — ???????????? ?? ??????? ???????????, ??????????? ??? ????????????. ???????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ? ???????? ?????????????? ??????. ???? ????????? ???????, ??????? ???? ?????????? ???????????????.
    ????????? – [url=https://5.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/]??????? ????????? ?? ??? ??????????[/url]

  • FrancisHeemy · 09/05/2026 at 6:44 AM

    ????? ?? ????? ? ????????????? — ?????? ?????????? ?????????? ????? ??? ??????????? ?????????. ???? ??????? ????? ???? ????????? ???? ?????, ????????? ????? ????????, ???? ??????? ??????????, ??????? ??????. ??????????????? ????? ???????? ????????? ?????? ? ????????????; ????????? ????????? ?????????????, ?????? ?????? ? ??????? ???????????????? ????? ???? ???????????. ???????? ?????? ???????? ???, ???????????? ??????? ??? ????????? ??? ??????????? ?????????? ?? ??????? ?????????? ???????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – https://7.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/

  • Harleycax · 09/05/2026 at 6:45 AM

    Now wondering how the writers calibrated the level of detail so well, and a stop at watchwarden continued the same calibration, the right level of detail is one of the harder editorial calls in any piece and this site has clearly developed an instinct for it through what I assume is years of careful practice publicly.

  • RustyFer · 09/05/2026 at 6:45 AM

    Just dropping by to say thanks for the effort, it does not go unnoticed when a writer cares this much about the reader, and after I went through zestycrate I was certain this is one of the better corners of the internet for this particular kind of content which is genuinely refreshing.

  • Craigmoora · 09/05/2026 at 6:52 AM

    Reading this in the time it took to drink half a cup of coffee, and a stop at maverickmint fit naturally into the second half, content that respects the rhythms of a typical morning is content with practical fit and this site has the kind of length and pacing that works for the way I actually read.

  • JorgeLef · 09/05/2026 at 6:52 AM

    Appreciate the practical examples, they made the abstract points easier to grasp, and a stop at stockstack added more of the same, this site clearly understands that real examples beat empty theory every single time which is the mark of a writer who knows their audience well and respects their time.

  • Sergioteala · 09/05/2026 at 6:53 AM

    Came in expecting another generic take and got something with actual character instead, and a look at seosignal carried that personality forward, finding a distinct voice on a saturated topic is impressive and worth pointing out when it happens because most sites end up sounding identical to their nearest competitors quickly.

  • Vivod iz zapoya_ermr · 09/05/2026 at 6:53 AM

    ?????? ?? ?????????, ?? ??????? ?? ??????. ? ????????, ???????? ????????. ???? ???????, ???????? ???. ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? ???? — ??? ?????? ????????. ????????, ??? ?????. ????????? ?? ????? ?? ???? [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-krasnoyarske-rmy.ru]????????? ?? ????? ?? ????[/url] ??? ??? ???????? ? ???? ??? ???????. ???? ??? ??????? ? ????? — ?? ?????. ????? ?? ????? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!

  • escort agency montpellier · 09/05/2026 at 6:55 AM

    Greetings! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form?
    I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having trouble finding one?
    Thanks a lot!

  • JorgeLef · 09/05/2026 at 6:59 AM

    A modest masterpiece in its own quiet way, and a look at stockstack confirmed the same quiet quality across the rest of the site, calling something a masterpiece is usually overstating but for content this carefully crafted the word feels appropriate even if the writers themselves would probably resist the label honestly.

  • Shawnkam · 09/05/2026 at 6:59 AM

    ?????????? ?? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ?????, ? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ? ?????????.
    ????????? – https://4.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/

  • Ericknop · 09/05/2026 at 7:00 AM

    Picked this up between two other things I was doing and got drawn in completely, and after makermerchant my original tasks were completely forgotten for a while, content that derails a workflow in a positive way by being more interesting than what you were already doing is rare and worth recognising clearly.

  • 33win · 09/05/2026 at 7:00 AM

    We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.
    Your website offered us with valuable information to work on. You’ve done an impressive job and our whole community will be thankful to you.

  • Kennethkes · 09/05/2026 at 7:02 AM

    ??????????????? ?????? ????? ???????? ??????????????? ???????????, ???????????????????? ???????????, ????? ????????, ????????????? ?????????? ?? ?????? ???????????? ??? ???????????, ? ??? ????????????? — ??????????????? ????? ?? ?????, ???????????? ? ?????????? ??????? ???????????. ? ??????? ??????????? ????????????? ????????? ?? ??? ??????????????? ??????? ???? ??????? ???????????, ? ??? ??????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????????, ?? ????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ????????? ?????????, ?????????????? ? ?????????. ?????? ??????????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ??????????? ?????, ??????? ???????? ??? ?????????? ? ?????? ???? ? ????? ??????????? ?????? ?? ????????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – [url=https://kodirovanie-ot-alkogolizma-pushkino4.ru/]?????????????? ??????????? ?? ???????????[/url]

  • DanielKef · 09/05/2026 at 7:02 AM

    ??????????????? ??????? «??????» ? ???????????? ???????? ??????????? ??????? ???????????, ?????????? ? ???????????????? ? ???????? ??????????, ??????????? ? ?? ????. ? ??????? ????? ???????? ????????????, ?????? ????????????, ????? ?? ?????, ?????? ?????, ??????????? ?? ???????????, ???????????????????? ??????? ? ????????????. ??????????????? ?????? ???????? ?????????????, ??????? ???????? ? ?????????. ???????? ????????? ????????, ???????? ? ????? ????????? ? ??????????? ?????? ?????????? ????????? ??????????????????. ??? ????????????? ???????????? ????? ????????? ?? ????, ????? ? ??????? ??? ????????? ???????? ? ??????????????? ?????.
    ?????? ?????? – https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-dolgoprudnyj3.ru/

  • DonaldOwets · 09/05/2026 at 7:05 AM

    ???????? ?? ??? ? ????????? — ?????????????? ?????? ??? ????????, ????? ???????? ????????? ???????????????? ??????????? ??????, ?? ?????????????? ???????? ? ????? ?? ?? ????? ??? ?? ?????. «?????????? ??????» ?????????? ????? ??????????? ?? ??? ?????????????, ? ???????? ? ??????????? ???, ????? ???? ?????? ??????, ?????? ????? ????????????, ???????? ??????????? ????????? ? ????????? ?????????? ????? ??????????? ???????. ??????? ????????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?????, ?????????? ?????????? ????????, ??????????? ????????????, ????????? ???????? ????? ???????????? ????????, ? ????? ??? ????????????? ???????????? ?? ??????? ??????????? ? ?????? ????? ???????????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://narkolog-na-dom-ramenskoe4.ru/]vyzov narkologa na dom[/url]

  • Clintonskigo · 09/05/2026 at 7:05 AM

    If I am being honest this is the kind of site I quietly hope my own work will someday resemble, and a stop at phishproof extended that aspirational feeling, finding work that models what I want to produce is part of why I read carefully and this site has been performing that modelling function for me lately consistently.

  • Rubencog · 09/05/2026 at 7:05 AM

    Liked the way the post got out of its own way, and a stop at jaspercart extended that invisible craft, the best writing you barely notice while reading because it is doing its work without drawing attention to itself and this site has clearly mastered that disappearing act across the pieces I have read.

  • Ericknop · 09/05/2026 at 7:06 AM

    Picked this up between two other things I was doing and got drawn in completely, and after makermerchant my original tasks were completely forgotten for a while, content that derails a workflow in a positive way by being more interesting than what you were already doing is rare and worth recognising clearly.

  • JorgeLef · 09/05/2026 at 7:06 AM

    Solid post, the structure is easy to follow and the language stays simple even when the topic gets a bit more involved, and a look at stockstack kept that same standard going, so I left feeling like the time spent here was actually worth something for once which is rare lately.

  • PedroMum · 09/05/2026 at 7:06 AM

    Honest reaction is that I want to send this to a friend who would benefit from it, and a look at cleaircove added more material I will pass along too, the impulse to share is the strongest signal I have for content quality and this site is generating that impulse cleanly across multiple posts.

  • Craigmoora · 09/05/2026 at 7:07 AM

    Liked the natural conversational tone throughout, never stiff and never overly casual either, and a stop at maverickmint kept that comfortable middle ground going, finding a tone that respects the reader without becoming distant or overly familiar is harder than it sounds and this site nails that balance consistently across many different pieces.

  • MaxInhet · 09/05/2026 at 7:08 AM

    Now I want to find more sites like this but I suspect they are rare, and a look at floraaisle extended that thought, the few sites that meet this quality bar are precious specifically because they are rare and finding others like them is one of the ongoing projects of careful internet curation across the years.

  • JesusHefly · 09/05/2026 at 7:09 AM

    During a reading session that included several other sources this one stood out, and a look at apexware continued the standout quality, the side by side comparison of sources during research is a useful exercise and this site has been winning those comparisons for me consistently across multiple research sessions during the last week.

  • KelvinDrend · 09/05/2026 at 7:11 AM

    Started reading without much expectation and ended on a high note, and a look at kelnix continued that arc, content that builds rather than peaks early is a sign of a writer who knows how to structure a piece for sustained reader engagement rather than relying on a strong hook to do all the work.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 7:12 AM

    ?? ???? ??????? ?? ??????? ?????????? ?????? ??????????.
    https://1-mk.ru/detail/459-bella-khadid-vozvrashchaetsya-litsom-k-kampanii-miss-sixty/

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 7:13 AM

  • Jacoblab · 09/05/2026 at 7:14 AM

    ????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????????, ????? ????????????, ???????????????? ? ?????????? ????? ???????.
    ????????? – [url=https://1.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ????? ?? ????? ? ???????????[/url]

1 3,774 3,775 3,776 3,777 3,778 3,814

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives