Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

190,711 Comments · Posted by beerorkid in lincoln, political

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

190,711 comments

  • Hermanjer · 09/05/2026 at 1:57 AM

    A piece that read as the work of someone who reads carefully themselves, and a look at spookysupply continued that informed feel, writers who are also serious readers produce work with a different quality and this site reads as the product of someone steeped in good writing rather than just generating content for an audience.

  • ???? ????? ????? · 09/05/2026 at 1:58 AM

    ?? ???????? ???

    ???? ????? ?? ?????

    ???? ?????? ??????

    ??? ??????

    ??? ??

    ?? ??? ???? ?????

    ??? ????????? ????

    ???? ???? ???? ??

    ???????? ???

    enfejaronline ????

    ?

    ?ibbet

    ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?????????

    ????? ????? ?????

    ????? ???? ???

    ?

    ??????

    ???? ?????????

    ?eel free to surf to my web-site :: ???? ????? ?????

  • Reginaldenump · 09/05/2026 at 1:58 AM

    This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at serumstation kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.

  • Jacoblab · 09/05/2026 at 1:59 AM

    ????????? ? ??????? ?????????????, ???? ??????? ?? ??????????? ??????????????, ???????????? ?????????? ??????????, ?????????? ???????? ?? ???????? ? ?????????? ???? ????????? ????????? ?????. ??????????????? ?????? ???????? ????? ??? ?????? ????????????, ??????? ???????????, ??????? ? ?????? ??????????, ????????? ? ?????? ??? ????????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://1.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ? ???????????[/url]

  • Finntub · 09/05/2026 at 1:59 AM

    A piece that exhibited the kind of patience that good writing requires, and a look at analyticsalley continued that patient quality, hurried writing is easy to spot and this site reads as having been written without time pressure which produces a different feel than the rushed content that dominates much of the modern blog space.

  • JoshuaVef · 09/05/2026 at 2:00 AM

    Beyond the immediate post itself the editorial sensibility behind the site is what struck me, and a stop at financefjord continued displaying that sensibility, content that reveals editorial choices through accumulated reading is content with structural quality and this site has clearly developed an underlying approach worth identifying through multiple sessions of reading.

  • college basketball wetten strategie · 09/05/2026 at 2:01 AM

    sichere college basketball wetten strategie
    heute

  • Shawnkam · 09/05/2026 at 2:01 AM

    ?????????? ?? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ?????, ? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ? ?????????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://4.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/]???????? ?? ??? ???? ? ???????????[/url]

  • basketball wetten über unter verlängerung · 09/05/2026 at 2:02 AM

    wettbüro bergedorf

    my homepage; basketball wetten über unter verlängerung

  • Ulysseskah · 09/05/2026 at 2:04 AM

    Reading this prompted me to clean up some old notes related to the topic, and a stop at sampleatelier extended that organising urge, content that triggers personal organisation rather than just consuming attention is content with motivating energy and this site has the kind of clarity that prompts active follow up rather than passive consumption.

  • Rajacuan · 09/05/2026 at 2:05 AM

    Your style is really unique compared to other people I’ve read stuff from.
    Many thanks for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just bookmark this site.

  • Kapelnica ot pohmelya_xukt · 09/05/2026 at 2:05 AM

    ??? ??? ??? ??? ????????? ????. ????? ??????, ???? ????????. ? ?????? ?????? ? ????????? ? ????? ??????, ??????? ????????? ?? ???. ????? ????????? ? ?????????? — ??, ??? ??????? ??? ? ?????. ???? ??????? ????? ???, ???????? ????. ??? ?????? ? ??? ??????. ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? ???? ????????? [url=https://kapelnicza-ot-pokhmelya-krasnodar.ru]https://kapelnicza-ot-pokhmelya-krasnodar.ru[/url] ?? ?????? — ????????? ?????????? ??? ???????. ?????? ??? ?? ?????. ?????????? ?? ???????? — ??? ???????? ??????, ??????? ????????!

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 2:06 AM

    ????? ??????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ??????????.
    https://1-mk.ru/detail/467-polnyy-obzor-igrovykh-avtomatov-v-randx-casino/

  • Dennissport · 09/05/2026 at 2:06 AM

    Liked everything about the experience, from the opening through to the closing notes, and a stop at devplain extended that into more pages, finding a site where the editorial vision shows through every choice rather than feeling random is an increasingly rare experience and one I am glad to have today during this particular reading session.

  • Kapelnica ot pohmelya_xekt · 09/05/2026 at 2:07 AM

    ?? ????? ??? ????????? ? ?????, ?????????? ???????. ? ??????????, ??? ?? ?????? ?? ?????????. ?? ????? ?? ?????????, ????? ???? ? ???????. ??????? ????? ?? ????? — ??? ???? ??, ??? ?????? ????. ???? ??????? ????? ???, ???????? ????. ???? ????????? ????????. ?????????? ?? ???? ????????? [url=https://kapelnicza-ot-pokhmelya-krasnodar.ru]?????????? ?? ???? ?????????[/url] ??? ??? ???????? ? ???? ??? ???????. ???? ??? ??????? ? ????? ??? ??????? ???????? — ?? ?????. ?????????? ?? ???????? — ??? ???????? ??????, ??????? ????????!

  • GeoffreySpemi · 09/05/2026 at 2:07 AM

    Worth recognising that the post did not pretend to be the final word on the topic, and a stop at willowvend continued that humility, content that admits its own scope and limits is more trustworthy than content that overreaches and this site has clearly developed the editorial maturity to know what it can and cannot claim well.

  • Harleycax · 09/05/2026 at 2:08 AM

    Decided I would read the archives over the weekend, and a stop at watchwarden confirmed that the archives would be worth the time, very few sites have archives I would actively read through but this one has earned that level of interest based on the consistent quality across what I have sampled so far.

  • JoshuaVef · 09/05/2026 at 2:08 AM

    If you scroll past this site without looking carefully you will miss something, and a stop at financefjord extended that mild warning, the surface of the site does not advertise its quality loudly which means careful attention is required to recognise what is being offered here which is itself a kind of editorial signal.

  • Craigmoora · 09/05/2026 at 2:09 AM

    Comfortable read, finished it without realising how much time had passed, and a look at maverickmint pulled me into more pages the same way, the absence of friction in good content lets time disappear and that is one of the highest compliments I can pay any piece of writing I find online during a regular search session.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 2:09 AM

    ?? ???? ????? ?? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ??????????.
    https://e-transavto.ru/read/tragicheskiy-final-poiskov-rybaka-na-ozere-busse-telo-naydeno-spustya-sem-dney-484/

  • blok_pitan_rpot · 09/05/2026 at 2:10 AM

    ??????? ?? [url=https://blok-pitaniya-i-led-lenti.netlify.app/]????? ?? ??????? ??? ???????????? ????? 24?[/url], ??? ?????????? ???? ??????? ?? LED-???????? ? ??? ????????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ??? ???????????? ?????.
    ????????? ????? ??????????? ???? ????????? ? ?????? ??????? ????????????.

    ### ?????? 2. ????? ????????????

    ???? ??????? ????????? ????? ??????????? ????? ????? ? ??????????? ?????.

    ### ?????? 3. ??????????? ? ????????????

    ????????????? ???????????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ?????????? ??????????????.

    ### ?????? 4. ???????????? ?????? ?????

    ?????????? ?? blok-pitaniya-i-led-lenti.netlify.app ???????? ???????? ?????? ??????? ????? ????????.

  • https://kronenburgersee75.nl/hoe-je-je-winst-bij-tennisweddenschappen-kunt-maximaliseren/ · 09/05/2026 at 2:12 AM

    bookmaker online wedden beste weddenschap sites (https://kronenburgersee75.nl/hoe-je-je-winst-bij-tennisweddenschappen-kunt-maximaliseren/)

  • Stanwog · 09/05/2026 at 2:13 AM

    A particular pleasure to read this with a fresh coffee, and a look at kitchenkite extended the pleasure across more pages, content that pairs well with quiet morning rituals is something I have come to value highly and this site has the kind of energy that fits naturally into a calm reading routine.

  • Hermanjer · 09/05/2026 at 2:15 AM

    Took me back a step or two on an assumption I had been making, and a stop at spookysupply pushed that reconsideration further, writing that gently corrects the reader without being aggressive about it is a rare diplomatic skill and the team here clearly knows how to land critical points without turning readers off.

  • Byronmap · 09/05/2026 at 2:15 AM

    A piece that prompted a small mental rearrangement of how I order related ideas, and a look at stablesupply extended that rearranging effect, content that affects the structure of my thinking rather than just adding to it is content with the deepest kind of impact and this site is reaching that depth for me today.

  • Edwardses · 09/05/2026 at 2:15 AM

    ???????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???????????? ? ??????????? ?????: ?????, ????????? ??? ??????????.
    ????????? – [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/]???????? ????? ?? ????? ??????[/url]

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 2:16 AM

    ????? ???-????? ??????? ????? ?????????? ??????????.
    https://pilot-club.ru/info/2026-07-10-trudovye-migranty-i-pustye-polya-pochemu-ovoshchi-vyrashchennye-v-rossii-obkhodyatsya-pokupatelyam-v-troynuyu-tsenu/

  • GeoffreySpemi · 09/05/2026 at 2:18 AM

    A piece that read as if the writer was thinking carefully rather than just typing fluently, and a look at willowvend continued that considered quality, the difference between fluent typing and careful thinking shows up in writing and this site reads as the product of thought rather than just the product of language fluency apparently.

  • HowardNog · 09/05/2026 at 2:18 AM

    ??????? ??????????? ? ??????? «?????????? ??????» ???????? ?????? ????????? ???????? ? ??? ?????????? ??????????? ? ?????????. ? ??????? ???? ????????? ???????????? ??????????? ???????????, ??????????? ????????????, ??????? ????????? ??? ???????????? ???????????, ?????? ?????????? ??????? ? ???? ??????????. ??????? ? ??????? ?????? ???, ??? ?????????? ????? ????????? ???????? ? ????????, ?????????????? ????????? ? ???????????? ?????? ???? ???????. ???? ????????? ?????????, ????? ??????? ???????? ???????????; ??? ????? ??????? ??????? ??????????? ???????? ????? ???? ????????????? ??????? ? ??????????.
    ?????? ?????? – https://lechenie-alkogolizma-vidnoe4.ru/

  • kd777 · 09/05/2026 at 2:18 AM

    Thank you a lot for sharing this with all people you actually understand what you are speaking approximately!

    Bookmarked. Please additionally visit my site =). We can have a hyperlink trade agreement
    among us

  • tkslot · 09/05/2026 at 2:19 AM

    Hi, every time i used to check web site posts
    here early in the dawn, as i like to find out more and more.

  • Rogerinapy · 09/05/2026 at 2:19 AM

    Excellent post, balanced and well organised without showing off, and a stop at orderopt continued in that same vein, this site has clearly figured out the formula for content that works for readers rather than for search engine ranking signals which is harder than it sounds today and worth real recognition from anyone.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 2:19 AM

    ????? ??????? ???? ???? ?????????? ?????????? ??????????.
    https://labdiz.ru/full/519-svyashchennik-usnuvshiy-zhertv-poluchit-srok-svyshe-pyati-desyatkov-let.htm

  • Hermanjer · 09/05/2026 at 2:23 AM

    A piece that read smoothly because the writer understood how readers actually move through prose, and a look at spookysupply maintained the same reader awareness, writers who think about the reading experience as much as the writing experience produce better work and this site has clearly made that shift in editorial approach.

  • GeoffreySpemi · 09/05/2026 at 2:23 AM

    I really like the calm tone here, it does not push anything on the reader, and after I went through willowvend I felt the same way, just steady useful content laid out without drama, which is exactly what someone trying to learn something quickly needs to find rather than aggressive marketing.

  • LeonardFot · 09/05/2026 at 2:23 AM

    ???????????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ????????, ? ?? ?? ?????????????? ??????? ??? ???? ???????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – https://2.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/

  • RodrigoQuipt · 09/05/2026 at 2:24 AM

    Really like the way the post resists reaching for cliches that would have made it feel generic, and a quick visit to pivotpalace kept that fresh feel going, original phrasing and unexpected metaphors are signs that the writer is actually thinking rather than just stitching together familiar phrases into the appearance of content.

  • Shawnkam · 09/05/2026 at 2:27 AM

    ???? ??????? ????? ???? ??????????, ???????? ??????????????? ? ????????????, ????????? ?????, ??????? ??????? ??? ??????, ????????????? ????? ??????????? ????????????. ??? ??????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????? ??????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://4.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/]???????? ?? ??? ????[/url]

  • JorgeLef · 09/05/2026 at 2:29 AM

    Pass this along to anyone you know dealing with similar questions, the answers here are clear, and a stop at stockstack adds even more useful material, this is the kind of resource that deserves to circulate widely rather than getting lost in the constant churn of new content online that buries good work daily.

  • GeoffreySpemi · 09/05/2026 at 2:30 AM

    Felt the writer was being honest with the reader which is rare enough that I want to acknowledge it, and a look at willowvend continued that honest feel, content built on actual knowledge rather than aggregated summaries is something I value highly and rarely come across in regular searches on the open internet these days.

  • JosephNic · 09/05/2026 at 2:30 AM

    ??? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????????? ?? ?????? ?? ????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????. ???? ???? ????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????? ??????, ? ????????? ??? ?????? ??????? ????? ????????????? ??????. ???? ????????? ???????, ???????????? ?????, ??????? ????????????, ????????? ?????????? ??????? ? ????????? ????????????????. ???????? ?????? ?????????????? ????? ??????????, ?????????????? ? ????????? ???????? ?? ???? ????????. ????????? ????????? ????????? ??????????? ???????????, ???????? ???????? ? ???????, ??????? ??????? ???????? ? ?????? ???????????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-ehlektrostal3.ru/]????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ????[/url]

  • Jamiespups · 09/05/2026 at 2:32 AM

    ??????????????? ?????? ???????? ?????????????, ??????? ???????? ???. ????? ??????? ???????????, ???????????? ??? ??? ??????? ????? ????????? ?? ???????? ? ???????? ???????? ??????: ???????, ???????????? ???????????? ????????, ????????? ?????????? ????????, ????????? ????????, ??????????? ????????????? ????????? ? ??????? ????????. ??? ?????????? ???????? ?????????????? ??????? ???????? ? ??????????, ????????? ?? ??????????? ?????? ?? ???? ??? ??????????????. ??? ??????? ???????, ?????? ??????????? ????????, ???????, ????????, ????????? ??????????????? ???? ????????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ????? ???? ?????????????, ??????? ??????????? ???????? ????????? ????? ?????????? ?????????? ? ??????????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-kolomna3.ru/]http://vyvod-iz-zapoya-kolomna3.ru[/url]

  • Craigmoora · 09/05/2026 at 2:33 AM

    Now thinking about this site as a small example of what good independent writing looks like, and a stop at maverickmint continued that exemplary status, the few sites that serve as good examples are sites worth holding up in conversations about quality and this one has earned that exemplary placement through patient consistent effort over time.

  • Hermanjer · 09/05/2026 at 2:34 AM

    Now adding this to a short list of sites I would defend in a conversation about the modern web, and a look at spookysupply reinforced that defence list, the few sites that serve as evidence the web can still produce good things are precious and this one has clearly joined that small list of exemplary sites.

  • Michaelspoon · 09/05/2026 at 2:36 AM

    ???????? ?? ??? ? ??????????? — ?????? ??? ???????, ????? ???????? ????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ??????????????? ??????? ? ???????. ???? ????????? ?????, ???????? ??????, ???????? ???????????? ???????????? ????????, ????????? ???????? ????????????? ???????? ? ???????? ???????. ????? ????? ???????? ??? ????????? ?????? ??? ?????, ???????? ? ?????? ?????????, ????????? ? ????????????. ??????? ???? ?????????? ?????? ????? ?????? ????????????????, ? ??? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ??????????? ??????? ? ??????????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://3.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/]????? ????????? ?? ??? ? ???????????[/url]

  • no-registration-casinos.net · 09/05/2026 at 2:36 AM

    Heya just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few
    of the images aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think
    its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same results.

  • NoelRobre · 09/05/2026 at 2:36 AM

    Reading this in a quiet hour and finding it suited the quiet, and a stop at grovegarnet extended the quiet reading mood, content that matches its own optimal reading conditions rather than fighting them is content that has been thoughtfully calibrated and this site reads as having a particular reading mood in mind throughout.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/05/2026 at 2:38 AM

    ?? ???? ??????? ????? ?????????? ?????????? ??????????.
    https://ipcfms.ru/read/393-mobilnyy-opyt-v-randx-casino-kak-igrat-so-smartfona.html

  • HowardNog · 09/05/2026 at 2:39 AM

    ??????????? ????????? ?????????? ?????? ???????. ??????? ? ??????? ????? ???? ????????????, ????? ??????? ???????? ?? ????????? ? ????????????, ??? ????????????, ????? ????????? ?????????? ??????????. ???? ????????? ????????, ?????? ?????? ?????????? ???????. ??? ??????? ????? ?????????? ??????? ? ?????????? ??????????, ??? ??????? ????. ???? ????????? ??????????, ???????? ????? ????????? ?????????? ??????? ???? ? ????????? ????????????? ? ???????.
    ????????? – [url=https://lechenie-alkogolizma-vidnoe4.ru/]??????? ??????? ???????????[/url]

  • Shawnkam · 09/05/2026 at 2:39 AM

    ???? ????????? ????????, ??????, ????? ???????, ?????? ????????? ????????? ??? ?????? ?????, ???????? ??????? ????? ???? ?????????????. ? ????? ??????? ???? ??????????? ?????????? ????????? ? ???????????? ??????????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://4.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/]???????? ?? ??? ????? ? ???????????[/url]

1 … 3,769 3,770 3,771 3,772 3,773 … 3,815

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives

To top