
the thread where this came from
I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.
SCS voting guide via Phatt
FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.
FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.
FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE
Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.
FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE
Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.
FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.
County Commisioner
I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.
FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX
I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.
FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE
Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).
Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups
The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.
Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.
Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund
This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.
Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs
This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.
Sure.
Amendment 4: Probation and Parole
The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.
This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.
Amendment 5: Early childhood education
This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.
The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.
Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.
This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.
Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements
This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.
Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.
This link explains this Amendments well.
http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt
Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.
If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…
I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.
Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.
Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.
Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.
This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.
No tags

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
« Previous 1 … 3,765 3,766 3,767 3,768 3,769 … 3,814 Next »NashTab · 09/04/2026 at 10:09 PM
Honestly impressed by the consistency of voice across what I have read so far, and a quick visit to everaisle continued that consistent feel, when a site reads like one careful person rather than a committee the experience is more rewarding for the reader who notices these subtle editorial details over time.
JadenBew · 09/04/2026 at 10:11 PM
Started believing the writer knew the topic deeply by about the second paragraph, and a look at vaultvalue reinforced that confidence, the speed at which a writer establishes credibility through their writing is a useful quality signal and this writer establishes it quickly and quietly without resorting to credential dropping or self promotion.
Vivod iz zapoya_cvSi · 09/04/2026 at 10:13 PM
????? ??? ????? ???? ???????, ? ???? ????????. ?? ???????? ??????? ? ??????, ?? ??? ???????: «?????? ???? ?? ??? ???????». ????????, ???????? ????????, ? ??? ???????: «??????? ????? ???». ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? ???? — ??? ??????? ????? ? ?????. ????? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ? ?????????. ?? ????????????, ? ???? ?????. ???? ???????? ????? ?? ????? [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-moskve-wdc.ru]???? ???????? ????? ?? ?????[/url] ??????????, ???? ???????? ???? ??? ???????. ???????, ?????????, ????????. ????? ?? ????? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!
NashTab · 09/04/2026 at 10:13 PM
Honestly impressed by the consistency of voice across what I have read so far, and a quick visit to everaisle continued that consistent feel, when a site reads like one careful person rather than a committee the experience is more rewarding for the reader who notices these subtle editorial details over time.
Additional Info · 09/04/2026 at 10:13 PM
Great post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed!
Very useful info specially the last part 🙂 I care for such information much.
I was seeking this certain information for a long time.
Thank you and good luck.
RichardGrike · 09/04/2026 at 10:14 PM
If a friend asked me where to read carefully on the topic I would send them here without hesitation, and a look at goldgraph confirmed the recommendation strength, the directness of my recommendation reflects how confident I am in the quality and this site has earned undiluted recommendations from me across multiple recent conversations actually.
JoshuaVef · 09/04/2026 at 10:16 PM
I really like the calm tone here, it does not push anything on the reader, and after I went through financefjord I felt the same way, just steady useful content laid out without drama, which is exactly what someone trying to learn something quickly needs to find rather than aggressive marketing.
Vivod iz zapoya v stacionare_xxPn · 09/04/2026 at 10:16 PM
????? ?? ?????? ???????? ?????????. ?? ?????? ?????????, ??? ?? ??????? ?? ??????. ?? ???????? ????? ? ?????. ????? ?? ????? ? ?????????? — ??? ??????? ??????? ?????. ?? ??????? ? ??????????, ??????? ????????? ???????. ?? ????? ?????? ? ??? ?????, ???????? ??????. ????? ?? ????? ??? ????????? [url=https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-staczionare-sankt-peterburg.ru]????? ?? ????? ??? ?????????[/url] ??? ??? ???????? ? ??????? ??? ?????? ??????. ???? ??? ??????? ?? ????? ?????????? ? ???????????? — ????????? ???? ???? ?? ????? ?????. ????? ?? ????? ? ?????????? — ??? ???????? ??????? ????????!
Vivod iz zapoya_kxSi · 09/04/2026 at 10:16 PM
????? ? ??????, ??? ??? ???? ????? ?? ??????, ?? ????????. ?? ???????? ??????? ? ??????, ?? ??? ???????: «?????? ???? ?? ??? ???????». ????????, ???????? ????????, ? ??? ???????: «??????? ????? ???». ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? ???? — ??? ??????? ????? ? ?????. ???? ???????, ???????? ???. ?? ????????????, ? ???? ?????. ???? ????????? ?? ????? [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-moskve-wdc.ru]https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-moskve-wdc.ru[/url] ??????????, ???? ???????? ???? ??? ???. ???? ??? ??????? ? ????? — ?? ?????. ????? ?? ????? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!
Curtisflous · 09/04/2026 at 10:19 PM
?????????? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????. ??????????????? ???????????? ????????? ???????? ?????-??????? ??????, ?????? ??????, ??????, ??????? ??????? ? ????????? ?????, ??????????? ???? ????????????? ????????, ??????????? ????????, ???????, ????????? ??????????????? ? ?????? ?????? ??????????. ??????? ?????????????? ????? ?????????? ???????????? ???????? ??? ??????????????? ????? ?????? ???????????. ???? ????????? ????????, ??????? ? ?????????? ????????, ????? ???? ????????? ?????????, ??????????? ???????? ? ?????????????? ????????. ????? ?????? ????????? ???????? ????? ?? ????? ????????????? ? ??????? ??????????? ????????? ?????????.
????????? – [url=https://1.vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/]http://1.vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/[/url]
NashTab · 09/04/2026 at 10:19 PM
Honestly impressed by the consistency of voice across what I have read so far, and a quick visit to everaisle continued that consistent feel, when a site reads like one careful person rather than a committee the experience is more rewarding for the reader who notices these subtle editorial details over time.
JesusChets · 09/04/2026 at 10:21 PM
Bookmarking this for later, the kind of resource I want to keep nearby, and a quick look at opencartopia confirmed the rest of the site is worth the same treatment, definitely going into my reference folder for the next time the topic comes up at work or in conversation with someone who asks.
CharlesWhind · 09/04/2026 at 10:23 PM
Worth marking the moment when reading this clicked into something useful for my own work, and a look at wifiwharf extended that practical click, content that connects to my actual life rather than just being interesting is content with the highest kind of value and this site is generating that connection at a high rate.
Peterbap · 09/04/2026 at 10:23 PM
Took the time to read the comments on this post too and they were also worth reading, and a stop at breakfastbay suggested the community quality matches the content quality, when the conversation around a piece is as good as the piece itself you know you have found a real corner of the internet.
TateJax · 09/04/2026 at 10:26 PM
Worth recognising the specific care that went into how this post ended, and a look at chromecentral maintained the same careful conclusions, endings are where most blog content falls apart and this site has clearly invested in the closing stretches of its pieces rather than letting them simply trail off when energy fades.
Curtisflous · 09/04/2026 at 10:26 PM
???? ????????? ????????, ?????, ??????? ? ???????? ????????, ????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????.
?????? ?????? – [url=https://1.vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/]vyvod-iz-zapoya-vyzov-na-dom[/url]
Forestcak · 09/04/2026 at 10:26 PM
Liked that the post acknowledged complications rather than pretending they did not exist, and a stop at comiccradle continued that honest framing, sites that handle complexity with care rather than papering it over with simplifying claims are doing real intellectual work and this one is clearly in that category based on what I have read.
smm panel djavapanel · 09/04/2026 at 10:28 PM
It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this fantastic
blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account.
I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this site with my
Facebook group. Talk soon!
Internet sportwedden · 09/04/2026 at 10:30 PM
eerlijke wedden sites top 10
Check out my web-site: Internet sportwedden
NoelRobre · 09/04/2026 at 10:31 PM
Reading this prompted a brief but useful conversation with a colleague who happened to walk by, and a stop at grovegarnet extended that conversational seed, content that becomes a starting point for in person discussion rather than ending in solitary reading is content with social generative energy and this site has plenty of it apparently.
RichardGrike · 09/04/2026 at 10:33 PM
Started thinking about my own writing differently after reading, and a look at goldgraph continued that reflective effect, content that influences how I work rather than just informing what I know is content with the highest kind of impact and this site has triggered some of that reflective influence today on me.
DanielKef · 09/04/2026 at 10:34 PM
???????? ?? ???? — ??????? ???????, ???? ??????? ?????????? ?????????? ????????, ????????? ????? ???????????????? ????? ??? ???????????? ????? ? ???????. ???? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????, ???????? ?????? ????????, ????????? ????? ???????????? ? ???????? ????? ??????????? ?????????. ????? ?? ???? ????? ??????????? ??? ?????? ???? ??????? ???????????, ????? ?????????? ??????????????? ???????? ? ???????? ?????????? ??????? ? ???????.
??????? ?????? ????????? – [url=https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-dolgoprudnyj3.ru/]??????????????? ???????[/url]
TateJax · 09/04/2026 at 10:34 PM
Found the section structure particularly thoughtful, and a stop at chromecentral suggested the same care across the broader site, structural choices guide the reader through the material in ways most people do not consciously notice but feel the absence of when those choices are made carelessly or not at all.
Philipineve · 09/04/2026 at 10:37 PM
? ???? ?????? ?? ????????????? ?????????????? ??????? ??????????? ?? ????? ????????. ??????????? ???????, ????? ??? ????????, ????????? ? ???????????????? ??????????. ???????? ?????? ? ????????????? ????????? ?? ??????? ? ? ????? ? ??????????????.
????????? ?????????? ???????? ?? ??????? – [url=https://i-am-new.ru/kodirovanie-ot-alkogolizma/kodirovka-po-metodu-dovzhenko/]????????? ?? ?????? ???????? ??????[/url]
GeoffreySpemi · 09/04/2026 at 10:37 PM
A piece that read as if the writer was thinking carefully rather than just typing fluently, and a look at willowvend continued that considered quality, the difference between fluent typing and careful thinking shows up in writing and this site reads as the product of thought rather than just the product of language fluency apparently.
Orlandocropy · 09/04/2026 at 10:43 PM
If the topic interests you at all this is a place to spend time, and a look at shipshapesolutions reinforced that recommendation, the broader question of where to invest topical reading time is one this site answers convincingly through the consistent quality across multiple pieces I have sampled during the current reading session today.
JoshuaVef · 09/04/2026 at 10:43 PM
However measured this site clears the bar I set for sites I take seriously, and a stop at financefjord continued clearing that bar, the metrics I use for site quality are admittedly informal but they are consistent and this site has cleared them on multiple measurements across multiple visits which is meaningful for my evaluation.
Shawnkam · 09/04/2026 at 10:44 PM
?????????? ?? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ?????, ? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ? ?????????.
???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://4.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/]???????? ?? ??? ???????? ? ???????????[/url]
Forestcak · 09/04/2026 at 10:44 PM
A nicely understated post that does not shout for attention, and a look at comiccradle maintained the same quiet quality, understatement is a stylistic choice that distinguishes serious writing from attention seeking writing and this site has clearly committed to the understated approach as a core editorial value rather than just a phase.
Vivod iz zapoya_rhmr · 09/04/2026 at 10:44 PM
?? ??? ?????? ??????? ? ????. ? ????????, ???????? ????????. ????? 2 ???? ?? ??? ????? ? ??? ???. ????? ?? ????? — ??? ?????? ????????. ??? ?????? ? ??? ??????. ??????? ????? ?? ???? [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-krasnoyarske-rmy.ru]??????? ????? ?? ????[/url] ?????????, ??????????, ?? ????????? ??? ???????. ???????, ?????????, ????????. ????? ?? ????? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!
Reginaldenump · 09/04/2026 at 10:45 PM
Halfway through I knew I would finish the post, and a stop at serumstation also held me through to the end, content that signals its quality early and then sustains it is content with real internal consistency and this site has clearly figured out how to maintain quality from opening sentence through to closing thought.
Rogermemia · 09/04/2026 at 10:45 PM
During a reading session that included several other sources this one stood out, and a look at spicecraftshop continued the standout quality, the side by side comparison of sources during research is a useful exercise and this site has been winning those comparisons for me consistently across multiple research sessions during the last week.
FrancisHeemy · 09/04/2026 at 10:46 PM
????? ?? ????? ? ????????????? ???????? ???????? ?? ???? ??? ? ?????????? ??????????????? ???????. ????????? ???????????, ?????, ?????? ? ????????-?????????? ???????. ???? ????? ????????? ????? ?????????? ?????????, ????????? ????? ???????, ??????? ???????????, ?????? ???????? ??? ??????????? ????????, ?????????? ?????????? ?? ?????????? ???????. ???????? ?????????? ?????? ????????? ????????, ??????????? ????????? ? ???? ???????; ?????????????? ??????????? ?????????? ???????????, ?????????? ??? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ??????? ??????. ??????????? ???????, ?????? ????????, ???????? ?? ????????? ??????? ???????? ? ??????????? ???????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????? ????????????.
?????????????? ?????????? – https://7.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/
LeoGaine · 09/04/2026 at 10:49 PM
Found this really helpful, the explanations are simple but they actually answer the questions a normal reader would have, and after I followed wordwarehouse I had a clearer sense of the topic, no extra fluff just useful points laid out in a sensible order that made the time worth it.
GeoffreySpemi · 09/04/2026 at 10:49 PM
Reading this gave me a small framework I expect to use going forward, and a stop at willowvend extended that framework, content that produces transferable mental models rather than just specific facts is content with multiplicative value and this site is providing those models at a rate that justifies extra attention from me regularly.
Coryliz · 09/04/2026 at 10:49 PM
Closed the laptop after this and let the ideas settle for a few hours, and a stop at xobasket similarly rewarded reflective time, content that benefits from sitting with rather than racing past is the kind I want more of and the kind that this site appears to consistently produce week after week here.
Stake Apuestas App · 09/04/2026 at 10:54 PM
under y over en Stake Apuestas App
Hermanjer · 09/04/2026 at 10:54 PM
Well crafted post, the structure flows naturally from one point to the next without forcing transitions, and a stop at spookysupply kept the same flow going, you can tell when a writer has thought about how their content reads rather than just what it contains and this is one of those examples.
Odds Vm 2026 · 09/04/2026 at 10:56 PM
anbefalte bettingselskaper
Also visit my page Odds Vm 2026
live Wedden sport spelletjes · 09/04/2026 at 10:56 PM
betrouwbare online live Wedden sport spelletjes app
MatthewHoide · 09/04/2026 at 10:56 PM
??????? ??????????? ????????
DonaldOwets · 09/04/2026 at 10:58 PM
???? ????????? ????????, ?????, ??????? ? ???????? ????????, ????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????.
????????? – [url=https://narkolog-na-dom-ramenskoe4.ru/]vyzvat narkologa na dom anonimno[/url]
kjente bettingsider · 09/04/2026 at 10:59 PM
Stop by my site: kjente bettingsider
JadenBew · 09/04/2026 at 11:00 PM
Solid post, the structure is easy to follow and the language stays simple even when the topic gets a bit more involved, and a look at vaultvalue kept that same standard going, so I left feeling like the time spent here was actually worth something for once which is rare lately.
JeromeEmbex · 09/04/2026 at 11:00 PM
??????????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????? ???????????? ????? ????? ?? ???. ?????????? ??????????, ????? ????????? ?????????, ????? ??????????? ????? ?????????????? ? ????????? ?? ?????????? ? ??????????. ????? ?????? ???????? ??????? ??????????? ?????????? ? ??????? ???????????????? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ????????.
???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://1.narcolog-na-dom-ekaterinburg0.ru/]???????? ?? ???[/url]
RichardGrike · 09/04/2026 at 11:02 PM
Decided after reading this that I would check this site weekly going forward, and a stop at goldgraph reinforced that commitment, deciding to add a site to a regular rotation requires meeting a quality bar that very few places clear and this one cleared it cleanly without any noticeable effort or marketing push behind it.
RobertHox · 09/04/2026 at 11:03 PM
??????? 1: ???????? ???????? ????????????????? ???????????????? ?????? ? ????
???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-tula10.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ??????????[/url]
LeoGaine · 09/04/2026 at 11:06 PM
Came in tired from a long day and the writing held my attention anyway, and a stop at wordwarehouse kept that going, content that can engage a fatigued reader is doing something right because most online reading happens in suboptimal conditions like that one and quality content adapts to it without complaint.
SterlingSiz · 09/04/2026 at 11:06 PM
Really clear writing, the kind that makes you want to share the link with someone who has been asking about the topic, and a quick browse through flarion only made me more sure of that, the information here stays useful long after the first read is done which says a lot.
Scottpsype · 09/04/2026 at 11:06 PM
???????? ?????? ??????, ????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????????? ?????? ? ???????. ??????? ??????????? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ? ????????? ??????????, ???????? ?????????????????? ?????????. ???????? ???????? ?? ??????, ???????? ?????? ? ?????????? ??????????? ???????. ?????? ?? ????????? ??????????? ? ?????????? ??????? ????????? ?????? ?????????? ?????: ???????? ???????? ??????????? ?????????????. ?????????? ?? ??????????????? ????????????? ????? ??? ?????? ????????, ??????? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ???????????.
?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://2.kapelnica-ot-zapoya-moskva0.ru/]chto-vhodit-v-kapelnicu-ot-zapoya[/url]