Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

189,300 Comments · Posted by beerorkid in lincoln, political

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

189,300 comments

  • GughedgeMum · 09/04/2026 at 6:57 AM

    ?? ???? ??????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??????????.
    https://moizvezdi.ru/stars/2026-05-29-eksklyuzivnye-ogranichennye-serii-sumok-karl-lagerfeld-pochemu-oni-stanovyatsya-obektom-kollektsionirovaniya/

  • OttoNog · 09/04/2026 at 6:59 AM

    A piece that did not require external context to follow, and a look at fixitfactory maintained the same self contained quality, content that stands alone without forcing readers to chase prerequisites is more accessible and this site has clearly thought about how each piece can serve a fresh visitor rather than only existing members.

  • EugeneAlams · 09/04/2026 at 7:00 AM

    In the middle of an otherwise scattered day this post landed as a moment of focus, and a stop at softreap extended that focused feeling across more pages, content that anchors a fragmented day rather than contributing to the fragmentation is content with real centring effect and this site is providing that anchoring function for me.

  • BasilMox · 09/04/2026 at 7:03 AM

    Spent a few minutes here and came away with a clearer picture of the topic, the writing keeps things simple without dumbing them down, and after a stop at saverstreet the rest of the points lined up neatly which is something I appreciate when I am short on time and need answers fast.

  • Kellymen · 09/04/2026 at 7:04 AM

    Took longer than expected to finish because I kept stopping to think, and a stop at formulaforest did the same to me, content that provokes thought rather than just delivering information is in a different category and the team here is clearly working at that higher level rather than just cranking out posts.

  • FrancisHeemy · 09/04/2026 at 7:06 AM

    ?????????? ?? ???? ? ????????????? ????? ???????? ??????????, ???????, ??????, ????? ????, ?????????? ?????????? ? ?????????????? ????????????? ????????. ??????????? ????? ??????????? ??????????: ?? ???? — ??????????? ????????, ?????????? ???????, ????????? ???????? ????????? ? ??????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????????. ????????????? ???? ????????? ??????? ??????????? ???????????, ?????????? ?????????, ???????, ????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ?????????? ???????. ???????????????? ????????? ?? ???????? ????????? ??????? ?????????????, ?? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ? ???????????? ?????? ?? ?????????? ????? ??????????? ??????? ???????????.
    ????????? – [url=https://7.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/]????? ?? ????? ? ?????????????[/url]

  • Avis · 09/04/2026 at 7:07 AM

    free casino win real money games cash app (Avis)
    in united states, best usa online casino bonuses and
    las vegas usa casino online no deposit bonus codes,
    or how much does canada spend on pokies

  • Jacoblab · 09/04/2026 at 7:08 AM

    ??????????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ? ???????????, ????????????? ? ??????? ??????? ???????????. ??????? ???????? ? ?????? ??????????? ???????, ???????????? ???????????? ????????????? ???????, ??????????? ? ???????????? ???????????, ???????? ???????? ? ????? ???????????? ??????? ?????????????? ?????? ????????. ???? ???????? ?????, ????????? ?????????? ????????????, ??????????? ? ??????? ??????, ????? ???? ?????????? ????????? ???????????, ??????? ? ?????????? ????????????. ??????? ????????????? ?? ??????????? ??????, ??? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ?????????? ? ??????????????? ???????, ??????????? ? ????????????? ????????? ??????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://1.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ???? ??????????[/url]

  • GughedgeMum · 09/04/2026 at 7:09 AM

    ????? ????? ??????? ????? ?????????? ??????????.
    https://www.efunda.com/members/people/show_people.cfm?Usr=sneakerizer

  • Doriankic · 09/04/2026 at 7:10 AM

    Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at techthimble continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.

  • JeromeEmbex · 09/04/2026 at 7:10 AM

    ????? ????????? ???????????? ????? ????????? ?? ???????? ??? ?????????? ??????. ?????????????? ?????????? ???????? ?????, ??????? ????????, ????????? ????????????????? ?????, ???????? ?????? ? ?????? ???????? ? ??????????? ????????????. ???? ?????? ?????? ???????, ????? ??????? ??????????? ??????????? ???????????? ? ?????????, ?????? ????????????? ??????? ? ??????? ????????? ???? ?????? ????? ??????? ???????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://1.narcolog-na-dom-ekaterinburg0.ru/]???????? ?? ???[/url]

  • JuanVon · 09/04/2026 at 7:10 AM

    Honestly this kind of writing is why I still bother to read independent sites, and a look at upcarton extended that broader reflection, the few sites that justify continued attention to non algorithmic content are sites like this one and finding them periodically is enough to keep my reading habits oriented toward independent rather than aggregated content.

  • Emilianodat · 09/04/2026 at 7:10 AM

    Reading this between two meetings turned out to be the highlight of the morning, and a stop at authorityanvil continued that highlight quality, content that outshines the structured parts of a working day is doing something well beyond ordinary and this site has produced multiple such highlights for me already this week alone.

  • KaleVub · 09/04/2026 at 7:11 AM

    Different feel from the algorithmically optimised posts that dominate the topic, and a stop at logiclens reinforced that human touch, you can tell when a site is being run by someone who reads what they publish versus someone just hitting submit and moving on quickly to the next assignment without checking the result.

  • EmanuelMicky · 09/04/2026 at 7:11 AM

    Granted I am giving this site more credit than I usually give new finds, and a look at toasttrek continued earning that credit, the calibration of how much trust to extend after limited exposure is something I do carefully and this site has earned more trust on shorter exposure than most due to consistent quality across.

  • Kellymen · 09/04/2026 at 7:13 AM

    Good quality through and through, no rough edges and no signs of being rushed, and a quick look at formulaforest kept the same polish going, the kind of site that respects its own brand by maintaining consistency across pages which is something I always appreciate as a reader looking for trustworthy information online today.

  • Stevenjab · 09/04/2026 at 7:14 AM

    ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ? ????????????? ????????? ???????? ??????? ? ????????? ? ????????? ??????????. ???????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????, ???????? ??????, ???????? ???????? ? ?????, ???????? ??????? ? ????????? ?????????. ???????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ??????? ? ???????? ?????????, ????????? ??????? ?? ??????? ??????????? ????????????? ???????????.
    ????????? – https://5.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/

  • GughedgeMum · 09/04/2026 at 7:15 AM

    ??? ????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??????????.
    https://spinninrecords.com/profile/bagcodex/following/

  • Jacoblab · 09/04/2026 at 7:15 AM

    ??????????????? ??????? ????????? ?????, ??????? ????????? ???????????, ??????? ? ????????? ???????? ??? ???????????. ??????????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ??????????, ?? ? ?????? ? ????????? ????????????. ? ??????????? ?? ????????? ?????? ????? ??????????? ???????????, ? ???????? ???????? ?????? ??? ??????????. ????? ????????? ???????????? ???? ????????? ????????? ??????, ???????? ?? ??????? ? ????????, ????? ????? ?????????? ??????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://1.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ??????? ??????[/url]

  • FrancisHeemy · 09/04/2026 at 7:18 AM

    ?????????? ?? ???? ? ????????????? ????? ???????? ??????????, ???????, ??????, ????? ????, ?????????? ?????????? ? ?????????????? ????????????? ????????. ??????????? ????? ??????????? ??????????: ?? ???? — ??????????? ????????, ?????????? ???????, ????????? ???????? ????????? ? ??????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????????. ????????????? ???? ????????? ??????? ??????????? ???????????, ?????????? ?????????, ???????, ????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ?????????? ???????. ???????????????? ????????? ?? ???????? ????????? ??????? ?????????????, ?? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ? ???????????? ?????? ?? ?????????? ????? ??????????? ??????? ???????????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://7.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/]?????? ????? ?? ????? ? ?????????????[/url]

  • FrancisHeemy · 09/04/2026 at 7:20 AM

    ?????? ????????? ????? ? ????????? ? ??????????, ?????????? ? ????????????????? ???????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://7.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/]????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ??? ? ?????????????[/url]

  • CharlesWhind · 09/04/2026 at 7:23 AM

    Just want to flag that this was useful and not bury the appreciation in caveats, and a look at wifiwharf earned the same direct praise, recognising good work without hedging it with criticism is something I try to practice because over qualified compliments tend to read as backhanded and miss the point sometimes.

  • bokep anak kecil · 09/04/2026 at 7:25 AM

    My brother recommended I might like this blog.
    He was totally right. This post actually made my day.
    You cann’t imagine just how much time I had spent for this info!
    Thanks!

  • Shawnkam · 09/04/2026 at 7:26 AM

    ?????? ???????? ????????? ??????????, ????????? ????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ??????? ?????????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://4.narcolog-na-dom-krasnoyarsk0.ru/]???????? ?? ??? ???? ??????????[/url]

  • Psihiatr na dom_wqKn · 09/04/2026 at 7:29 AM

    ????? ? ??????? ???????? ???????? ? ??????? ? ??????????. ??? ?????? ?????? ? ???????????? ???????? ?? ????. ??????? ??????????, ??? ???? ?????????, ??????? ????????? ?? ???. ????? ?????-????????? ? ?????? — ??? ???? ?????? ??, ??? ??? ?????. ???????? ???????, ??? ???????????? ???, ?????????????. ??????? ????? ?????????, ???? ???????????????. ?????????? ????, ??? ?????????? ? ???????? ?????????. ???????????? ????????? ?? ???? [url=https://psikhiatr-na-dom-v-moskve-jru.ru]https://psikhiatr-na-dom-v-moskve-jru.ru[/url] ??? ??? ???????? ? ??????? ??? ???. ?? ??????? ??????? ? ???? — ???????? ????????? ?? ???.

  • KaleVub · 09/04/2026 at 7:30 AM

    Granted I am giving this site more credit than I usually give new finds, and a look at logiclens continued earning that credit, the calibration of how much trust to extend after limited exposure is something I do carefully and this site has earned more trust on shorter exposure than most due to consistent quality across.

  • BasilMox · 09/04/2026 at 7:30 AM

    Comfortable in tone and substantive in content, that is a hard combination to land, and a look at saverstreet kept that pairing alive across more material, this is what good editorial direction looks like in practice and the team here clearly has someone keeping a steady hand on the wheel across what they decide to publish.

  • Frankhed · 09/04/2026 at 7:31 AM

    ???????????? ??????????????? ?????????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – http://msk-clinica-plus.ru

  • GughedgeMum · 09/04/2026 at 7:32 AM

    ????? ??????? ??????? ????? ?????? ??????????.
    https://superlooks.ru/look/2215-the-evolution-of-guess-bags-from-classic-to-contemporary/

  • Doriankic · 09/04/2026 at 7:34 AM

    On reflection this is the kind of writing that improves my taste for what is possible in the format, and a look at techthimble continued raising that bar, content that elevates my expectations rather than lowering them is doing important work in calibrating my standards and this site is participating in that elevation reliably.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/04/2026 at 7:35 AM

    ?? ???? ???-????? ????? ????? ???????? ??????????.
    https://belgaumonline.com/profile/fa96a53909094e85ee50ed9b63ce51ee/favorites

  • EmanuelMicky · 09/04/2026 at 7:35 AM

    Picked this for my morning read because the topic seemed worth the time, and a look at toasttrek confirmed the choice was right, my morning reading slot is precious and giving it to this site felt like a good investment rather than a waste which is a higher endorsement than I usually offer for content.

  • Stevenjab · 09/04/2026 at 7:37 AM

    ?????? ????? ???????? ????????????, ????????????, ????????? ? ?????????? ????????????? ?? ??????????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – [url=https://5.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/]???? ????? ?? ?????[/url]

  • JesusChets · 09/04/2026 at 7:37 AM

    Decided to subscribe to the RSS feed if there is one, and a stop at opencartopia confirmed that decision, content that I want delivered to me proactively rather than just remembered when I have time is content that has earned a higher level of commitment from me as a reader looking for reliable sources.

  • Simonter · 09/04/2026 at 7:38 AM

    Speaking as someone who reads a lot on this topic this site has earned a high position in my source rankings, and a stop at mealprepmanor reinforced that ranking, the informal ranking of sources for a topic is something I maintain mentally and this site has moved into the upper portion of those rankings clearly.

  • Emilianodat · 09/04/2026 at 7:38 AM

    Decided to subscribe to the RSS feed if there is one, and a stop at authorityanvil confirmed that decision, content that I want delivered to me proactively rather than just remembered when I have time is content that has earned a higher level of commitment from me as a reader looking for reliable sources.

  • KaleVub · 09/04/2026 at 7:39 AM

    Granted I am giving this site more credit than I usually give new finds, and a look at logiclens continued earning that credit, the calibration of how much trust to extend after limited exposure is something I do carefully and this site has earned more trust on shorter exposure than most due to consistent quality across.

  • BasilMox · 09/04/2026 at 7:39 AM

    Beats most of the alternatives on the topic by a noticeable margin, and a look at saverstreet did not change that at all, this is one of the better corners of the open internet for this kind of content and I am glad I clicked through rather than skipping past quickly like I usually do.

  • Stevenjab · 09/04/2026 at 7:40 AM

    ???????? ????????? ?? ???? ????? ?????????????. ???????? ?? ??????, ??????? ?????????, ?????????, ???????????, ??????????, ???????????????, ????????????????? ? ?????? ?????? ?????????????. ??????????? ??????? ? ????????? ???????????? ??????? ???????? ???????? call-??????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – [url=https://5.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/]????? ?? ????? ? ??????? ????????????[/url]

  • literary research paper topics · 09/04/2026 at 7:40 AM

    Hello, I enjoy reading through your article post.
    I wanted to write a little comment to support you.

  • JeromeEmbex · 09/04/2026 at 7:41 AM

    ???? ????????? ????????, ???????? ? ????????, ?????? ????????, ???????? ????????, ????????, ???????? ?????????? ??? ?????????????, ?????????? ?????????? ??????????? ??????. ? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????????????? ??????????? ???????? ???????????: ????? ????????????? ?????? ??????, ??????????? ?????????? ? ?????????????? ? ?????????????????? ??????????.
    ????????? – [url=https://1.narcolog-na-dom-ekaterinburg0.ru/]???????? ?? ???[/url]

  • Psihiatr na dom_sksi · 09/04/2026 at 7:43 AM

    ????? ??????? ????? ????????, ????????? ?? ???, ? ?? ?????? ?? ??? ???????. ??????? ??????? ?? ????? ???????? ?? ????, ?????? ??????? ? ??????. ? ?????????????, ???????. ?????????, ????????????, ??? ?????? ?????. ????? ?????-????????? ? ?????? — ??? ??????? ??????????? ? ???. ????????, ??? ??????????? ? ?? ?????????? ? ????? ???????? ??? ?????. ??????? ????? ?????????, ???? ????????? ???? ????????. ????????, ??? ?????? ??????????. ???????? ?? ??? ??? ???????? ???????? ?????? [url=https://psikhiatr-na-dom-v-moskve-tqa.ru]???????? ?? ??? ??? ???????? ???????? ??????[/url] ?????????, ??????????, ?? ????????? ??? ???. ??? ??????, ????????? ? ????????????? ????????.

  • MarionInevy · 09/04/2026 at 7:44 AM

    ??????? ?? ????????????? ? ??????, ????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????? ???????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ???????????. ??? ??????????? ????????????? ?????????? ???????? ? ????????? ???????????, ??????????, ?????????? ? ?????????? ? ???????? ??? ??????????. ??????? ??????????? ??????????? ?????? ?????? ???? ? ??????? ??????????, ????? ??????????? ????????? ????? ?????????????? ????? ???????????? ?????????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://1.narkologicheskaya-klinika-balashiha5.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ????[/url]

  • Bertacumb · 09/04/2026 at 7:48 AM

    Worth a quiet moment of recognition for the consistency I have noticed across multiple posts, and a stop at saltandsatin continued that consistent quality, sites that maintain quality across many pieces rather than peaking on one viral post are sites with real editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed that discipline carefully.

  • Emilianodat · 09/04/2026 at 7:48 AM

    Reading this on the train into work was a better use of the commute than my usual choices, and a stop at authorityanvil extended that commute reading well, content that improves transit time rather than just filling it is content with practical benefit and this site has earned its place in my morning commute reading rotation.

  • Mckinley · 09/04/2026 at 7:48 AM

    uruguay real madrid arsenal apuestas (Mckinley)

  • KaleVub · 09/04/2026 at 7:49 AM

    The depth of coverage felt about right for the format, neither shallow nor overwhelming, and a look at logiclens kept that calibration going, getting the depth right for blog format is genuinely difficult because too shallow loses experts and too deep loses beginners but this site nailed it nicely which I really do appreciate.

  • FrancisHeemy · 09/04/2026 at 7:50 AM

    ???? ? ???????????? ? ????????????? ??????? ????????? ????? ??????, ????? ????? ?????? ? ???????, ?? ??? ???????????? ???????? ????. ????? ?????????? ? ????? — ??????????? ????????, ?????, ??????????, ????????, ?????????????, ????????? ????, ????????? ?????, ???????? ??? ???????? ???????. ? ??????? ??? ???? ??????????? ???????? ? ????????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – https://7.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-ekaterinburge16.ru/

  • Simonter · 09/04/2026 at 7:54 AM

    Now appreciating that the post did not try to imitate any other style I might recognise, and a stop at mealprepmanor continued that distinct voice, content with its own register rather than borrowed from elsewhere is content with real authorial presence and this site has clearly developed that presence through what feels like patient editorial work.

  • Casa de apuestas cerca de mi · 09/04/2026 at 7:55 AM

    que es asiatico en Casa de apuestas cerca de mi

1 … 3,748 3,749 3,750 3,751 3,752 … 3,786

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives

To top