Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

186,401 comments

  • suisemog · 09/03/2026 at 3:59 AM

    18+ content represent a form of digital content targeted at mature audiences.
    Such videos may serve for exploring sexuality as well as for personal enjoyment.
    That said, it is vital to differentiate between real-life relationships and fictional depictions.
    Responsible viewing requires acknowledging personal limits and selecting licensed platforms.
    mom son incest porn

  • LandynZique · 09/03/2026 at 3:59 AM

    Quietly enthusiastic about this site after the past few hours of reading, and a stop at honeyandhustle extended that enthusiasm, the calibration of enthusiasm to evidence is something I try to maintain and this site has earned a calibrated quiet enthusiasm rather than the loud excitement that usually fades within a day or two of finding something.

  • CordellZoova · 09/03/2026 at 4:00 AM

    Took a quick scan first and then went back to read properly because the post deserved it, and a stop at europeelevate kept me reading carefully too, the kind of writing that earns a slower second pass rather than getting skimmed and forgotten is something I value highly when I happen to find it.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/03/2026 at 4:02 AM

  • Tyronetange · 09/03/2026 at 4:04 AM

    Liked everything about the experience, from the opening through to the closing notes, and a stop at roastandroute extended that into more pages, finding a site where the editorial vision shows through every choice rather than feeling random is an increasingly rare experience and one I am glad to have today during this particular reading session.

  • porn here · 09/03/2026 at 4:05 AM

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I truly appreciate your efforts
    and I am waiting for your further write ups thank you once again.

  • StefanSoade · 09/03/2026 at 4:05 AM

    Decided not to skim despite my usual habit and was rewarded for the discipline, and a stop at lattelegend earned the same patient approach, training myself to recognise sites that warrant slower reading is part of being a careful online reader and this site is the kind that helps me practice that skill regularly.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/03/2026 at 4:06 AM

    ?? ???? ???-????? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ??????????.
    https://franch-expo.ru/

  • JerryDiuse · 09/03/2026 at 4:09 AM

    ????? ????????? ?? ??? ????????? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ??????? ? ???????. ???? ??????? ?? ?????????? ??????, ???????? ????????? ???????????? ? ?????????, ???????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ? ???????? ????????. ???? ????????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ????????, ?????????? ????????? ??????????????. ????? ?????? ???????? ??????, ????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ????????, ?????? ????? ? ????? ??? ????????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????????????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-domodedovo3.ru/]????? ?? ????? ????????[/url]

  • Robertdatry · 09/03/2026 at 4:09 AM

    ?????? ??????? “?????? ????” — ?????????????? ????????????? ? ???????????? ?????, ??????????? ? ????? ???????????. ?? ???????????? ??????????? ??????, ?????????? ??????????? ???????, ??????????????? ?????? ? ?????????? ?????????. ???? ?????? — ?? ?????? ????????? ?????????? ???????????, ?? ? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????? ????????, ????? ?? ???? ????????? ? ??????????? ????? ? ????????.
    ????????? ????? ?????? ??? – http://??????-?????-??-?????.??

  • Tyronetange · 09/03/2026 at 4:11 AM

    A piece that did not try to be timeless and ended up reading as durable anyway, and a look at roastandroute extended that durable feel, content that stays useful past its publication date without straining for permanence is content that ages well and this site has the kind of evergreen quality that I value highly today.

  • Samdom · 09/03/2026 at 4:11 AM

    Now understanding why someone recommended this site to me a while back, and a stop at printparlor explained the recommendation, sometimes recommendations make sense only after experience and this site has finally clicked into place as the kind of resource I now understand was being recommended for sound editorial reasons by my friend.

  • JerryDiuse · 09/03/2026 at 4:12 AM

    ? ???????? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ???????? ??????? ??????????? ??????? ???????????. ??? ??????????? ?????????, ?????? ????????, ?????????, ?????????? ??????????? ??? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????????? ????????? ? ??????????????? ?????? ??????. ????? ?? ????? ?? ???????? ?????????????? ??????????? ? ?? ?????? ??????????? ?????????????? ??? ?????????? ????? ??????????.
    ????????? – https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-domodedovo3.ru/

  • Jameljailt · 09/03/2026 at 4:12 AM

    High quality writing, no marketing speak and no buzzwords that mean nothing, and a stop at appelite kept that going, simple direct content that actually communicates something is harder to find than it should be and this is one of the rare places that gets it right consistently across many different posts.

  • ManuelTheaf · 09/03/2026 at 4:14 AM

    ??????? ??????????? ? ??????? ?????????? ??????? ?????????? ???????????? ???????. ? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????????????? ????? ??????????. ??????????????? ????????? ????? ???????? ????????????, ??????????????? ???????, ???????????, ???????????? ?????????, ???????????? ? ????????????. ???????? ???????????? ?? ?????? ??????, ????? ??????? ???? ???????????????? ? ??????????????? ??????????? ???????.
    ?????? ?????? – https://2.narkologicheskaya-klinika-moskva11.ru/

  • PedroCrott · 09/03/2026 at 4:14 AM

    Will be back, that is the simplest way to say it, and a quick visit to techtroubleshoot reinforced the decision, this site has earned a spot in my regular rotation alongside a few other reliable places I check when I want something genuinely informative without all the usual modern web noise getting in the way.

  • GughedgeMum · 09/03/2026 at 4:16 AM

    ?? ?????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??????????.
    https://em-center.ru/

  • Brunoroole · 09/03/2026 at 4:17 AM

    ???????? ???? ???????????? ?? ????? ???????, ?????? ?? ??????? ?????? ???? ??????. ?? ?? ?????????? ??? ?????, ????? ?? ???????? ????????-???????????? ????? ? ?? ??????????? ????????. ???? — ??????????????? ????? ???????; ??????????? ?????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ???? ?? ??????????? ??????? ? ???????? ? «????? ??????».
    ????????? – [url=https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-rostove-na-donu16.ru/]????? ??????????????? ??????? ??????-??-????[/url]

  • Josephscalk · 09/03/2026 at 4:18 AM

    ????????????? «??????? ??????????» ?? ??????????. ?? ????????? ?????? ?? ??????? ?????????, ????????????? ? ?????? ????????-???????????. ?????? — ??????? ??????? ??????? ? ????????????? ?????? ??? ??? ???????????.
    ???????? ?????? – [url=https://vivod-iz-zapoya-voronezh15.ru/]?????? ????? ?? ?????[/url]

  • Williamrhige · 09/03/2026 at 4:19 AM

    ?????? ???????? ????????? ??? ???????????? ????????, ??????? ???????????, ?????????? ?????? ?????, ????????? ????????? ? ??????????? ??? ???????????, ? ????? ??? ????????? ????????-??????????, ??????????????? ? ??????????????? ????????????? ?????????. ? ????? ????????? ??????????? ?????????? ????? ???? ?????????????: ????????? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ? ?????? ???????? ? ????????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://2.vyvod-iz-zapoya-moskva011.ru/]vyvod-iz-zapoya-moskva-na-domu[/url]

  • Tyronetange · 09/03/2026 at 4:19 AM

    Useful read, especially because the writer did not assume too much background from the reader, and a quick look at roastandroute continued in the same way, a thoughtful site that meets people where they are which is something the modern web could use a lot more of for both casual and serious readers.

  • Jameljailt · 09/03/2026 at 4:21 AM

    Reading this confirmed that my time researching the topic in other places had not been wasted, and a stop at appelite extended the confirmation, when independent sources agree that is a useful signal and this site is one of the more reliable sources I have found for cross checking what I read elsewhere on similar subjects.

  • suisemog · 09/03/2026 at 4:21 AM

    Adult films represent a category of digital content targeted at adults.
    Such videos may function for educational purposes as well as for private pleasure.
    That said, it should be noted to distinguish between real-life intimacy and fictional performances.
    Conscious viewing requires understanding consent and opting for legitimate providers.
    incest porn stories

  • RobertElona · 09/03/2026 at 4:23 AM

    ?????? ??????? ??????????? ? ?????????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????, ?????????? ?? ????????? ????????????. ?? ????????, ??? ??????????? — ??? ???????????, ????????? ???????????? ???????. ? “??????? ?????????? ? ????????????” ?? ????????? ??????? ????????? ???????, ??? ?????? ??????? ????? ??????? ???????? ? ????? ?????????, ??????? ????????? ?? ??????? ????????????. ???? ??????? ?????????? ???????, ?????????? ?? ??????? ?????? ? ??????????? ???????, ??? ????????? ????????? ??????? ???????????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://alko-konsultaciya.ru/]????? ?? ????? ???? ? ?????????[/url]

  • quien ganara la liga apuestas · 09/03/2026 at 4:24 AM

    quien ganara la liga apuestas deportivas españa

  • Heathglimi · 09/03/2026 at 4:27 AM

    Reading this prompted a small note in my reference file, and a stop at domainward prompted another, the rare site that contributes useful nuggets to my own working knowledge rather than just consuming my attention is worth the time investment many times over compared to the usual pile of forgettable scroll content.

  • DannyPen · 09/03/2026 at 4:28 AM

    Really like that the writer trusts the reader to follow simple logic without restating every previous point, and a stop at trafficthrive kept that respect going, treating an audience as capable adults rather than as people who need constant hand holding makes a noticeable difference in the reading experience for me.

  • DanielSpext · 09/03/2026 at 4:28 AM

    ? ???? ?????? ?? ????????????? ?????????????? ??????? ??????????? ?? ????? ????????. ??????????? ???????, ????? ??? ????????, ????????? ? ???????????????? ??????????. ???????? ?????? ? ????????????? ????????? ?? ??????? ? ? ????? ? ??????????????.
    ???????, ????? ?????? ?????? – [url=https://vyvod-is-zapoya24.ru/service/kodirovanie-ot-alkogolizma/ukolom/]??????????? ??????[/url]

  • EganBubre · 09/03/2026 at 4:28 AM

    Worth saying that the writing carries a particular kind of authority without making any explicit claims to it, and a stop at formulafoundry extended that earned authority feeling, sites that demonstrate expertise through the quality of their explanations rather than by stating credentials are sites I trust most and this site has it.

  • Jameljailt · 09/03/2026 at 4:31 AM

    A well calibrated piece that knew its scope and stayed inside it, and a look at appelite maintained the same scope discipline, scope creep is one of the failure modes of long blog posts and this site has clearly invested in the editorial discipline to prevent it which shows up in tightly contained pieces.

  • SonnyPed · 09/03/2026 at 4:31 AM

    Felt slightly impressed without being able to point to one specific reason, and a look at blogbarn continued that diffuse positive feeling, when content works at a level you cannot easily articulate the writer is doing something with craft rather than just delivering information and that is something I have learned to recognise.

  • LandynZique · 09/03/2026 at 4:31 AM

    Got something practical out of this that I can apply later this week, and a stop at honeyandhustle added more details to think about, this is exactly the kind of content I bookmark for future reference rather than the throwaway listicles that dominate most search results these days for almost any common topic.

  • ZackNem · 09/03/2026 at 4:34 AM

    Skipped lunch to finish reading, which says something, and a stop at outboardoutlet kept me at my desk longer than planned, when content beats the lunch impulse the writer has done something genuinely impressive in an attention environment full of immediately satisfying alternatives competing for the same finite block of reader time.

  • LhanePhage · 09/03/2026 at 4:37 AM

    I like how this post keeps the discussion clear, engaging, and comfortable for readers with different perspectives online.
    3google top

  • WilliamAsymn · 09/03/2026 at 4:40 AM

    ??? ????? ?? ??????: https://carfrance.ru

  • DanielSpext · 09/03/2026 at 4:40 AM

    ? ?????? ?????? ?? ????????? ? ??????? ????????, ?????????? ???????? ?? ????????? ??????????? ? ?? ??????????. ???????? ?????? ? ????? ???????? ? ???????, ???? ?????????????? ?????????? ? ???????????? ??????????????????? ????????.
    ??????? ????? – [url=https://vyvod-is-zapoya24.ru/]???????????????? ????? ??????[/url]

  • Williamboare · 09/03/2026 at 4:42 AM

    ???????? ? ???????: https://diabetschoolmakisheva.ru

  • DavidTes · 09/03/2026 at 4:43 AM

    ??????? ??????? ?????? — ??????????? ?????????????? ????????. ?????????? ???????? ????????? ?????????? ??????????? ? ????????????? ????????, ?? ???? ?? ???? ?? ????????? ??????? ??????????? ???????????. ????? ???????????? ???? ????? ?????????? ?????????? ???????, ????????????, ???????????, ???????????? ? ????????? ?????????????. ???? ?? ?????? ???????? ????????? ?????????? ? ???, ??????? ????? ????? ?? ?????, ????? ????????? ?????????? ?? ???? ? ? ???????, ????? ????????? ? ????? ? ?????? ??????? ????????????. ????????? ???????????? ?? ??????????????? ???????? ????? ??????????????? ?????????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-ehlektrostal3.ru/

  • Vincentref · 09/03/2026 at 4:43 AM

    A piece that reads like it was written for me without claiming to be written for me, and a look at fabricfalcon produced the same fit, when the writer audience match clicks naturally without being engineered through demographic targeting you know the writing is solid and this site has that natural fit consistently for me.

  • DannyPen · 09/03/2026 at 4:45 AM

    Thanks for the simple approach, too many sites bury the actual point under layers of unnecessary words, but here every line earns its place, and a look at trafficthrive showed the same care for the reader which is something I will remember the next time I need answers on a topic.

  • paedophile · 09/03/2026 at 4:48 AM

    Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve visited your blog before but after looking at many
    of the posts I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely pleased I stumbled upon it and I’ll be
    bookmarking it and checking back often!

  • PedroCaf · 09/03/2026 at 4:49 AM

    Glad to find something on this topic that does not start with three paragraphs of throat clearing before getting to the point, and a stop at driftdomain also dives right in, respect for the readers time shows up in small editorial choices like this and they add up to a real difference quickly.

  • ????????? · 09/03/2026 at 4:52 AM

    Hello! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any issues with hackers?
    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing several
    weeks of hard work due to no data backup. Do you have any solutions to protect against
    hackers?

  • AviSah · 09/03/2026 at 4:53 AM

    Now noticing that the post never raised its voice even when making a strong point, and a look at mensmodevault continued that calm volume, content that can make important points without resorting to typographic emphasis or emotional appeal is content that trusts its substance to do the work and this site has that confidence consistently.

  • Www.Lumisoq.Com · 09/03/2026 at 4:53 AM

    web Android Wedden 2026; http://Www.Lumisoq.Com,
    bookmaker

  • StefanSoade · 09/03/2026 at 4:54 AM

    If quality blog writing is dying as people sometimes claim then this site is one piece of evidence that it has not died yet, and a look at lattelegend extended that evidence, the broader cultural question about online writing has empirical answers in specific sites and this one is contributing to a more optimistic answer overall.

  • webpage · 09/03/2026 at 4:56 AM

    I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your website.
    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a
    developer to create your theme? Great work!

  • Vincentref · 09/03/2026 at 4:58 AM

    Easy to recommend without reservations, the site delivers on every promise it implicitly makes, and a look at fabricfalcon kept that same standard going, the kind of consistency that earns trust over time rather than chasing it through aggressive marketing is what I see here and it is appreciated greatly by this particular reader today.

  • Phillipret · 09/03/2026 at 4:58 AM

    During a reading session that included several other sources this one stood out, and a look at orderswift continued the standout quality, the side by side comparison of sources during research is a useful exercise and this site has been winning those comparisons for me consistently across multiple research sessions during the last week.

  • random trc20 wallet address · 09/03/2026 at 4:59 AM

    Hello, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at your blog in Safari, it looks
    fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping.
    I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, awesome blog!

1 3,719 3,720 3,721 3,722 3,723 3,729

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives