Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

184,872 Comments · Posted by beerorkid in lincoln, political

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

184,872 comments

  • ForrestNub · 09/02/2026 at 12:06 AM

    Learned something from this without having to dig through layers of fluff, and a stop at dorvoria added a bit more context that helped tie things together for me, definitely a useful corner of the internet for anyone who wants real information without the usual marketing nonsense around it that often ruins similar pages.

  • Jerryplade · 09/02/2026 at 12:07 AM

    ??? ????????? ??????? ???? ??????????? ??? ??????????? ? ??????????? ???????. ????? ?? ???????? ?????????????? ??????????, ??????????? ???????????? ? ?????? ??????????, ?????????? ????????? ? ???????????????.
    ??????????? ????? – https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-ufa9.ru/

  • RaymondRok · 09/02/2026 at 12:10 AM

    ????? — ???????? ?????? ??? ??????????? ? ????????????. ???? — ?????????, ??????? ??????? ????? ??????? ??????? ?? ??????????? ?????????. ???? ????????? ???? ?? ???? ?????, ????? ????? ???????? ???????? ? ???????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ???????????? ??? ??????.
    ????????? ??? – [url=https://vivod-iz-zapoya-rostov14.ru/]?????????? ????? ?? ?????[/url]

  • Westonmaich · 09/02/2026 at 12:10 AM

    Now recognising the editorial wisdom of letting some questions remain open at the end, and a look at silvaneo continued that intellectual honesty, content that does not force closure on contested questions is content that respects the limits of knowledge and this site has clearly developed the maturity to know when to leave space.

  • Rockygow · 09/02/2026 at 12:11 AM

    Just sat back at the end of the post and felt grateful that someone took the time to write it, and a look at remoteranch extended that gratitude across more of the site, recognising effort behind quality work is part of what makes the open web a community rather than just a marketplace today.

  • Stella · 09/02/2026 at 12:11 AM

    Greetings! Very useful advice in this particular post! It’s the little changes
    that will make the biggest changes. Many thanks for sharing!

  • Gilbertzorce · 09/02/2026 at 12:13 AM

    Thanks for keeping things clear and to the point, that is honestly hard to find online these days, and after reading through frolicfusion the message stayed consistent which makes me trust the information being shared more than I usually do on similar pages that cover this same kind of topic.

  • JustinNem · 09/02/2026 at 12:15 AM

    «??? ???????? ????-???????? ???? ???????? ????????, «?????????? ????? ?? ????? ???????? ?????? ??? ??????? ????????????, ??? ??? ??????????? ????? ???????? ? ??????? ???????????»».
    ??????? ?????? ?????? – http://vyvod-iz-zapoya-ryazan14.ru

  • Mariojealk · 09/02/2026 at 12:16 AM

    Worth a quiet moment of recognition for the consistency I have noticed across multiple posts, and a stop at sendersanctuary continued that consistent quality, sites that maintain quality across many pieces rather than peaking on one viral post are sites with real editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed that discipline carefully.

  • prodentim2_ivst · 09/02/2026 at 12:18 AM

    Discover more about oral care at [url=https://prodentim2026us.netlify.app/]prodentim at walgreens[/url] and see what makes it stand out.
    The site focuses on practical information that helps visitors make sense of daily care.

    ## Section 2

    If the content is easy to read, people can focus on the details that matter most.

    ## Section 3

    A neat presentation can encourage visitors to stay longer and look around more.

    ## Section 4

    For anyone researching oral wellness online, prodentim2026us.netlify.app offers a focused starting point.

  • prodentim2_wzst · 09/02/2026 at 12:18 AM

    Discover more about oral care at [url=https://prodentim2026us.netlify.app/]prodentim real reviews[/url] and see what makes it stand out.
    The platform offers practical details that may help people better understand routine care.

    ## Section 2

    That convenience can create a smoother experience for someone visiting for the first time.

    ## Section 3

    People often assess a website not only by design but also by practical value.

    ## Section 4

    Users usually respond positively to pages that respect their time and attention.

  • Rockygow · 09/02/2026 at 12:19 AM

    Felt no urge to argue with the conclusions even though I started the post slightly skeptical, and a look at remoteranch maintained that pattern, writing that earns agreement through clarity of argument rather than rhetorical pressure is the kind I find most persuasive and the kind I want to read more of these days.

  • ArnoldArtig · 09/02/2026 at 12:19 AM

    Now noticing the careful balance the post struck between confidence and humility, and a stop at cybershieldshop maintained the same balance, finding the line between asserting and admitting is hard and this site has clearly developed the calibration to walk that line consistently which produces a more persuasive reading experience for me.

  • EdwardTrula · 09/02/2026 at 12:19 AM

    ? ???? ?????? ??????????????? ??????? ??????????? ??????????? ? ???????? ??????? ?????, ??????? ?????????? ? ???? ?????????. ?? ??????? ???????? ????????? ?? ??????? ??????? ? ??????????????, ? ????? ?????????, ??????? ????? ?????? ? ???????? ?????????????. ????????? ?????????????? ????? ? ????? ?????.
    ??? ??? ????? ?????? – [url=https://peredozirovka.info/articles/alkogol-v-povsednevnoy-zhizni/]???????? ? ????? ???????[/url]

  • Terryhourn · 09/02/2026 at 12:20 AM

    ?????? ???????? ????? ???????? ????? ?????? ?????

  • Connerlot · 09/02/2026 at 12:23 AM

    Halfway through I knew I would finish the post, and a stop at luggageledger also held me through to the end, content that signals its quality early and then sustains it is content with real internal consistency and this site has clearly figured out how to maintain quality from opening sentence through to closing thought.

  • EdwardTrula · 09/02/2026 at 12:23 AM

    ? ???? ?????? ?? ???????? ????????????? ??????????? ?????? ?????? ? ?????????????, ??????? ????????????, ??????????????? ??????? ? ????????? ?? ??????? ????????. ?? ??????????? ???????? ?? ???????? ???????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ????????? ?????????????? ??? ?????, ????????????? ? ???? ?????????.
    ???????????? ?????????? – [url=https://peredozirovka.info/articles/pochemu-alkogol-usilivaet-trevogu/]??????? ??????? ????? ????????[/url]

  • ErnestFed · 09/02/2026 at 12:25 AM

    Most of my reading time goes to a small number of trusted sources and this one is now joining that group, and a stop at tidalthimble reinforced the group membership, the few sites that earn a place in my regular rotation are sites I expect ongoing returns from and this one has earned that elevated position consistently.

  • ArnoldArtig · 09/02/2026 at 12:26 AM

    Looking back on this reading session it stands as one of the better ones recently, and a look at cybershieldshop extended that ranking, the informal ranking of reading sessions against each other is something I do mentally and this session ranks high largely because of this site and a couple of related pages here.

  • Tommydom · 09/02/2026 at 12:27 AM

    ????? ??????????? ???????????? ???????? ??????????? ????????????????? ?????????, ???????????? ?? ???????????? ?????? ??????? ? ?????????? ??????? ???????. ????????? ??????? ???????? ????????????, ??????????????? ? ?????????????? ??????? ? ???????????????. ??????? ???? — ???????????? ??????????? ????????? ? ???????????? ????????????? ? ??????? ??????????? ?? ??????? ?????????????.
    ???????? ?????????????? ?????????? – https://narkologicheskaya-clinika-v-kazani16.ru/klinika-narkologiya-kazan

  • olymp_baSa · 09/02/2026 at 12:28 AM

    ????? ??????? ???? [url=www.olymp13502.shop]www.olymp13502.shop[/url]

  • Ernestodup · 09/02/2026 at 12:28 AM

    Quality work here, the post reads cleanly and the points stay focused throughout, and a stop at sagesight kept the standard high, you can tell the writer cares about the final result rather than just hitting publish for the sake of having something new on the page to feed the search engines.

  • Rockygow · 09/02/2026 at 12:28 AM

    Reading this triggered a small reorganisation of my own thinking on the topic, and a stop at remoteranch furthered that reorganisation, content that affects the shape of my mental model rather than just decorating it with new facts is content with structural rather than informational impact and this site provides that.

  • Angeljaw · 09/02/2026 at 12:29 AM

    Useful reading material, the kind I can hand off to someone newer to the topic without worrying about confusing them, and a quick look at blog66hang confirmed the same beginner friendly tone runs throughout the site which is great for sharing with people just starting their learning journey on this particular topic.

  • Mariojealk · 09/02/2026 at 12:30 AM

    Really like that the writer trusts the reader to follow simple logic without restating every previous point, and a stop at sendersanctuary kept that respect going, treating an audience as capable adults rather than as people who need constant hand holding makes a noticeable difference in the reading experience for me.

  • Westonmaich · 09/02/2026 at 12:31 AM

    Now considering the post as evidence that careful blog writing is still possible, and a look at silvaneo extended that evidence, the broader question of whether the modern web can sustain quality writing has obvious empirical answers in sites like this one and seeing them is reassuring even when they remain a minority overall today.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_ddpi · 09/02/2026 at 12:32 AM

    ????? ? ?? ??? ???????? ?? ??? ??????? — ? ?????, ??? ????? ?????? ???????????. ??? ??? ?????? ? ?? ?? ????? ????????. ? ???????? ?? ?? ?????, ? ??????? ?? ???????????. ? ????????, ? ??? ????????: «??????? ????? ???». ??????? ???????????? — ??? ??????? ??? ? ?????. ???????? ??????????. ????????, ??? ?????, ??? ?????? ????????. ???? ????????? ????, ??? ? ?????. ????????? ?? ????? ???? [url=https://pohmelye.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-moskva-hst.ru]????????? ?? ????? ????[/url] ?????????, ??????????, ?? ????????? ??? ??????. ?????? ??? ?? ?????. ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!

  • DavionPoump · 09/02/2026 at 12:32 AM

    Speaking honestly this is among the better discoveries of my recent browsing, and a stop at streamingstash reinforced that discovery quality, the ranking of recent discoveries is informal but meaningful and this site has placed near the top of that ranking based on the consistency of quality across what I have already read carefully.

  • ArnoldArtig · 09/02/2026 at 12:33 AM

    Reading this triggered a small but real correction in something I had assumed, and a stop at cybershieldshop extended that corrective effect, content that updates my beliefs through evidence rather than rhetoric is content with intellectual integrity and this site has earned that label consistently across the pieces I have read so far today.

  • JustinNem · 09/02/2026 at 12:33 AM

    ????? ?? ????? ? ?????? ???????? ?????????????? ??????????? ???????, ???????????? ?? ???????????? ????????? ???????? ????? ??????????? ???????????? ????????. ??????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????? ????????????, ??????????? ?????? ? ????????? ???????????? ???????? ?????? ??????? ?????????, ??????? ?????????? ????????????? ???????? ? ????????????? ??????????. ??????? ??????? ?????????????? ? ??????????? ???????? ??? ?????????? ??????????? ??????.
    ???????? ?????????????? ???????? – [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-ryazan14.ru/]????? ?? ????? ?????????????[/url]

  • Jerryplade · 09/02/2026 at 12:35 AM

    ?? ????????, ????????? ????? ??????????? ??? ????????? ? ?? ???????. ? «???????????» ??? ????????? ?????????????? ?? ?????? ????????, ??? ?????????? ?????? ?????? ? ??????????????? ?????. ???? ??????? ????? ?? ????? ??????? ????????, ???? ??????? ???????? ????????? ??? ? ?????.
    ???????? ?????? – [url=https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-ufa9.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ??????? ??????????? ? ???[/url]

  • Vivod iz zapoya_zzPr · 09/02/2026 at 12:36 AM

    ?? ?????? ????????, ??? ?? ???????. ????? ? ????? ? ????????? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????????, ??? ??? ????????? ????. ??? ????????: «??????? ????? ???». ????? ????????? ? ?????? — ??? ???? ??? ?????? ????. ???????? ??????????, ???? ?????? ?????????. ?? ????????????, ? ???? ?????. ????? ?? ????? ????? ????????? [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-moskve-bqk.ru]https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-moskve-bqk.ru[/url] ?????????, ??????????, ?? ????????? ??? ?????? ??????. ???? ??? ??????? ? ????? — ?? ?????. ????? ?? ????? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!

  • Mariojealk · 09/02/2026 at 12:37 AM

    Came in expecting another generic take and got something with actual character instead, and a look at sendersanctuary carried that personality forward, finding a distinct voice on a saturated topic is impressive and worth pointing out when it happens because most sites end up sounding identical to their nearest competitors quickly.

  • Connerlot · 09/02/2026 at 12:38 AM

    Took the time to read every paragraph rather than skimming for the punchline, and a quick visit to luggageledger earned the same careful attention from me, that is the highest signal I can give about content quality because my default mode is rapid scanning rather than deliberate reading on most pages.

  • ErnestFed · 09/02/2026 at 12:42 AM

    Felt a small spark of recognition when the post named something I had been struggling to articulate, and a look at tidalthimble produced more such moments, the rare service of giving readers language for fuzzy intuitions is one of the higher values that good writing can provide and this site offered several today instances.

  • Mariojealk · 09/02/2026 at 12:44 AM

    Worth a quiet moment of recognition for the consistency I have noticed across multiple posts, and a stop at sendersanctuary continued that consistent quality, sites that maintain quality across many pieces rather than peaking on one viral post are sites with real editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed that discipline carefully.

  • CurtisBox · 09/02/2026 at 12:45 AM

    Generally I am cautious about recommending sites on first encounter but this one warrants the exception, and a look at devgrid reinforced the exception making, the rare site that justifies breaking my normal cautious approach is the rare site worth flagging early and this one has prompted exactly that early flagging response from me.

  • melbet_dcon · 09/02/2026 at 12:47 AM

    melbet actualizare apk [url=www.melbet2772.shop]www.melbet2772.shop[/url]

  • tkslot · 09/02/2026 at 12:47 AM

    What’s up everyone, it’s my first visit at this web site, and article is genuinely fruitful in support of me, keep up posting these content.

  • GavinPhive · 09/02/2026 at 12:51 AM

    Bookmark added with a small mental note that this is a site to keep, and a look at sunnyshipment reinforced the keep status, the verb keep rather than visit captures something about how I think about this kind of site and it is a higher tier of relationship than I have with most places online today.

  • Zacharyanalp · 09/02/2026 at 12:52 AM

    Reading this gave me a small refresher on something I had partially forgotten, and a stop at lunivora extended the refresher, content that strengthens existing knowledge rather than just adding new is content with a particular kind of consolidating value and this site is providing that consolidating function across multiple visits.

  • Danielmoild · 09/02/2026 at 12:52 AM

    ?????????? ?? ????? ? ?????? ? ?????? «??????? ????» ??????????? ??? ????????????, ?????? ?????????? ??????????? ??????????? ? ?????????????? ?????-???????? ???????. ????????? ????? ??????????? ?? ???? ??? ? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????. ???? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????????, ???????????? ????????, ??????????? ????????, ??????? ????????????? ???????? ? ????? ????????????. ????? ????? ??????????? ?????? ???????? ? ?????????, ??????? ???????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ? ????????? ??? ??????? ?? ??????? ???????, ??????, ?????? ? ???????? ?????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://1.kapelnica-ot-zapoya-moskva0.ru/]????? ????? ?? ??? ?????????? ?? ?????[/url]

  • DavionPoump · 09/02/2026 at 12:53 AM

    Reading this brought back the satisfaction I used to get from blogs ten years ago, and a stop at streamingstash kept that nostalgic quality alive, sites that capture what was good about an earlier era of internet writing are increasingly precious and this one is doing that without feeling like a deliberate throwback at all.

  • VincentMUp · 09/02/2026 at 12:56 AM

    The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at vpnveranda kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_zlst · 09/02/2026 at 12:56 AM

    ????? ? ???????? ? ??????, ??? ?? ???????? ?? ????. ??? ??????, ?? ?? ??? ????????. ???? ??????? ????? ??? — ??? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ? ???? ?????. ??????? ????? ????????? ? ?????? — ??? ???? ??? ???????. ???? ?????? ?????, ????? ?????????? ??? ?????????????. ??? ??????, ??? ??????. ?????????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? [url=https://kapelnica.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-moskva-hst.ru]?????????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ????[/url] ?????????, ??????????, ?? ????????? ??? ???. ?????? ??? ?? ?????. ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ??????????, ? ??? ????????!

  • Jerryplade · 09/02/2026 at 12:57 AM

    ??????? «???????????» ???????????:
    ????????? – [url=https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-ufa9.ru/]????? ??????????????? ???????[/url]

  • Westonmaich · 09/02/2026 at 12:57 AM

    Better signal to noise ratio than most places I check on this kind of topic, and a look at silvaneo kept that going, every paragraph here carries something worth reading rather than padding out the page to hit some arbitrary length target that search engines reward but readers ignore as soon as they notice it.

  • Gilbertzorce · 09/02/2026 at 1:00 AM

    Honestly slowed down to read this carefully which is not my default, and a look at frolicfusion kept me in that careful reading mode, the kind of writing that demands attention by being worth attention is rare in a media environment full of content engineered to be skimmed not read with any real focus today.

  • Connerlot · 09/02/2026 at 1:02 AM

    Now noticing the post fit a particular gap in my reading without my having articulated the gap before, and a look at luggageledger extended that gap filling effect, content that meets needs I had not consciously formulated is content with reader insight and this site has clearly developed that anticipatory editorial sense across many pieces.

  • Chasehusly · 09/02/2026 at 1:02 AM

    Genuinely glad I clicked through to read this rather than skipping past, and a stop at seasprayshop confirmed I should keep clicking through to more pages here, the kind of resource that justifies its place in my browser history rather than feeling like wasted time which is the highest compliment I offer any site online today.

1 … 3,689 3,690 3,691 3,692 3,693 … 3,698

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives

To top