Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

180,376 comments

  • Flat White · 08/29/2026 at 9:02 PM

    My partner and I stumbled over here coming from a different
    web address and thought I might as well check things out.
    I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to going over your
    web page repeatedly.

  • XavierMulge · 08/29/2026 at 9:04 PM

    Now recognising that this site has earned a place in the small group of resources I treat as authoritative, and a stop at tulapixel confirmed that placement, the difference between resources I trust and resources I just consume is real and this site has clearly moved into the trusted category through consistent quality over time.

  • Arnoldrep · 08/29/2026 at 9:07 PM

    Picked this site to mention to a colleague who would benefit, and a look at reportroost added more material I will pass along, recommending sites to colleagues is a higher bar than recommending to friends because the professional context demands more careful curation and this site cleared the professional bar without me having to think.

  • Colemot · 08/29/2026 at 9:08 PM

    Now wishing more sites covered topics with this level of care, and a look at blog44fish extended that wish across more subjects, the rarity of careful coverage on most topics is a problem and this site is one of the small antidotes to that broader pattern of casual or surface treatment of complex subjects.

  • Carterger · 08/29/2026 at 9:10 PM

    ???????? ?????? ????????? ???????? ????????? ? ??????? ?????????? ? ??????? ? ???????? ???????? ? ????????? ??????????. ??????????? ?????????????? ???????? ???? ??????????? ????? ???????????? ? ????????? ??????????.
    ?????????? ? ???? – https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-ekaterinburg0.ru/chastnaya-narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-ekb/

  • BrysonGep · 08/29/2026 at 9:11 PM

    Worth recommending broadly to anyone who reads on the topic, and a look at yottamart only confirms that, the rare combination of accessibility and depth in this site makes it suitable for both newcomers and people who already know the area which is hard to pull off in any blog format today and rarely managed.

  • EnriqueTum · 08/29/2026 at 9:12 PM

    Reading this prompted me to send the link to two different people for two different reasons, and a stop at slatesync provided ammunition for a third share, content that suits multiple audiences without being generic enough to be useless to any of them is genuinely valuable and this site has that multi audience quality clearly.

  • Philliphally · 08/29/2026 at 9:17 PM

    Took a chance on the headline and was rewarded, and a stop at canadacabin kept the rewards coming as I clicked through, the kind of place where every link leads somewhere worth the click is a small luxury on the modern web where so many sites are mostly empty calories disguised as content.

  • EnriqueTum · 08/29/2026 at 9:17 PM

    Now appreciating the small but real way this post improved my afternoon, and a stop at slatesync extended that small improvement effect, content that produces measurable positive impact on the texture of a reading day is content with real value and this site is producing those small positive impacts at a sustainable rate apparently.

  • Ericknop · 08/29/2026 at 9:17 PM

    Reading this triggered a small change in how I think about the topic going forward, and a stop at makermerchant reinforced that subtle shift, the rare content that actually moves my thinking rather than just confirming or filling it is the kind I most value and this site is providing that kind of impact today.

  • KalebDrire · 08/29/2026 at 9:20 PM

    Good clean post, no errors and no awkward phrasing that breaks the reading flow, and a stop at monitormerchant kept the same standard, definitely the kind of editorial care that earns a return visit because it tells me the writer is paying attention to details that matter to readers rather than just rushing publication.

  • Kennethopecy · 08/29/2026 at 9:20 PM

    ?????? ????? ?????: https://365.lviv.ua

  • MiltonBoalo · 08/29/2026 at 9:21 PM

    Thanks for treating the topic with the seriousness it deserves without becoming pompous about it, and a stop at compliancecorner continued that balanced treatment, the gap between earnest and self serious is huge and writers who can stay on the right side of it earn my respect when I find them online today.

  • Jesustut · 08/29/2026 at 9:22 PM

    ??? ??????????? ?????? ???????? ??????????????? ????????? ?? ??? ??? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????? ???????. ???? ???????? ???????? ?????? ??????????, ????? ??? ?????, ???????????? ???????? ? ???????????, ? ????? ???????? ??????? ???????, ????? ?????????? ??????? ??????????? ???????????? ? ???????????? ?????????????? ???? ???????.
    ???????? ?????????????? ?????????? – https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-donetsk-dnr0.ru/vyvod-iz-zapoya-czena-doneczk-dnr

  • XavierMulge · 08/29/2026 at 9:23 PM

    Thanks for a post that does not try to be funny when it is not the moment for it, and a stop at tulapixel maintained the same appropriate seriousness, knowing when humour helps and when it just signals desperation for engagement is a sign of editorial maturity that many blogs have not developed yet.

  • EnriqueTum · 08/29/2026 at 9:23 PM

    Reading this as part of my evening winding down routine fit perfectly, and a stop at slatesync extended the wind down nicely, content that calms rather than agitates is what I want at the end of the day and this site provides that calming reading experience reliably which is increasingly rare across the modern web.

  • LarryKapox · 08/29/2026 at 9:23 PM

    ???????????????? ????????? ? ??????????????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ???????????? ???????? ?????????, ?????????????? ???, ????????????? ???????????? ? ??????????? ???????. ??? ?????????? ????? ???????????? ?????? ????????????, ??????????? ????????? ? ????????? ?????????. ???????? ???????? ????????? ????????? ????????, ?????? ? ?????????????? ? ???????? ??????? ????????? ?????????????? ? ?????????? ??????.
    ????????? ??? – http://narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-ekb16.ru/gosudarstvennaya-narkologicheskaya-klinika-ekaterinburg/

  • RichardGrike · 08/29/2026 at 9:24 PM

    Walked away in a slightly better mood than when I started reading, that says something about the writing, and a stop at goldgraph kept that going, content that leaves you feeling more capable rather than overwhelmed is the kind I keep coming back to again and again over the years and across many topics.

  • MauriceGew · 08/29/2026 at 9:25 PM

    Quality work here, the post reads cleanly and the points stay focused throughout, and a stop at ketsi kept the standard high, you can tell the writer cares about the final result rather than just hitting publish for the sake of having something new on the page to feed the search engines.

  • Ericknop · 08/29/2026 at 9:30 PM

    Now wondering how the writers calibrated the level of detail so well, and a stop at makermerchant continued the same calibration, the right level of detail is one of the harder editorial calls in any piece and this site has clearly developed an instinct for it through what I assume is years of careful practice publicly.

  • MylesNew · 08/29/2026 at 9:30 PM

    Came in skeptical and left mostly convinced, that is the highest praise I can offer, and a look at orbitorder pushed me further in the same direction, content that survives a critical first read is rare and worth recognising because most blog posts crumble under any real scrutiny these days when you actually pay attention closely.

  • Edwardodit · 08/29/2026 at 9:30 PM

    ??????? ?? ???? ???????? ?????????, ????????? ??????? ???? ????????? ??? ???????????? ??????????. ????????????? ????????? ????? ????????? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ? ????????? ?????? ?????????? ? ?? ??????????? ????????? ?? ???????? ???. ????? ???????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ???????? ????????, ??????? ??? ????????, ??? ????? ???????????? ?????, ????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????????, ????? ???? ????????? ???? ? ??????? ?? ??????????? ???????????.
    ????????? – [url=https://2.vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/]skoraya-pomoshch-vyvoda-iz-zapoya[/url]

  • BrysonGep · 08/29/2026 at 9:30 PM

    Honestly enjoyed every minute spent here, that is not something I say lightly, and a look at yottamart confirmed I will be back, the bar for spending time online is high for me these days but this site clears it without effort which is high praise indeed from this reader who is usually rather demanding.

  • FletcherHof · 08/29/2026 at 9:31 PM

    This actually answered the question I had been searching for, and after I checked makonda I had a few more pieces I had not realised I needed, that is the sign of a site that knows what its readers want before they even know how to ask it which is impressive.

  • LarryKapox · 08/29/2026 at 9:31 PM

    ???????????????? ????????? ? ??????????????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ???????????? ???????? ?????????, ?????????????? ???, ????????????? ???????????? ? ??????????? ???????. ??? ?????????? ????? ???????????? ?????? ????????????, ??????????? ????????? ? ????????? ?????????. ???????? ???????? ????????? ????????? ????????, ?????? ? ?????????????? ? ???????? ??????? ????????? ?????????????? ? ?????????? ??????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-ekb16.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ???? ????????????[/url]

  • get a tron wallet · 08/29/2026 at 9:31 PM

    I don’t even know the way I stopped up right
    here, however I thought this put up used to be great. I do not realize who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger in the event you aren’t already.
    Cheers!

1 3,606 3,607 3,608

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives