Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

180,307 comments

  • DelbertFrelp · 08/29/2026 at 3:54 AM

    ?????? ????? ???????? ????????, ? ?????????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://2.kapelnica-ot-zapoya-moskva0.ru/]?????????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ????????[/url]

  • Holdenjef · 08/29/2026 at 3:55 AM

    If I had to summarise the editorial sensibility of this site in a few words it would be careful and human, and a look at sheetstudio extended that summary feeling, capturing the essence of a sites approach in brief is hard but this site has a clear enough identity that the summary comes naturally enough.

  • Roberttug · 08/29/2026 at 3:56 AM

    ??????????????? ??????? ? ???????? ????????????? ????????????????? ?????? ?????, ????????????? ? ??????????? ??? ????????????? ????????????. ?? ????????? ??????????? ?????? ????????????, ??????????????? ???????????? ? ??????????????? ????????????, ??????????? ???????????? ? ????????????? ???????. ??????????? ??????? ???????? ?????????????, ??? ????????? ?????????? ??????????? ?? ?????????? ???????? ? ????????????? ?????????????? ??????.
    ????????? ??? – http://

  • Kapelnica ot pohmelya_zfEl · 08/29/2026 at 3:56 AM

    ?? ???????? ???? ????. ?? ??????, ??? ?? ?????. ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????. ??, ??? ????????????? ??????? — ??????? ????? ?????????. ?????? ????? ?????. ????? ??????, ???????. ?????? ????? ? ????. ???? — ???????, ??? ????????. ??? ??? ????? ?? ?? ????. ?????????? ?? ???? ?? ???????? [url=https://zapoy.kapelnicza-ot-pokhmelya-ekaterinburg-sdj.ru]?????????? ?? ???? ?? ????????[/url] ??????????, ???? ???????? ???? ??? ?????? ??????. ?????? ???? ??????????? — ????. ??? ????? ??????!

  • JamesHaste · 08/29/2026 at 3:58 AM

    ??????? «??????» ???????? ? ????????? ??????????? ??????????? ??????????. ?????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????? ??? ?????? ???? ??????? ???????????, ? ?? ??? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ? ????????????. ????? ???????????? ??????? ????? ???????? ???????????? ?????????, ????????? ??? ??????????????, ?????? ???????????, ??????????? ? ???????????????? ?????????. ??????????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ??????? ????????? ??????, ???????????? ???, ??????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ????????? ? ?????????. ??????????? ? ?????????????????? ??????????? ?? ???? ?????? ?????????.
    ????????? – [url=https://1.vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/]????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ???[/url]

  • Ernestoaboft · 08/29/2026 at 3:58 AM

    I usually skim posts like these but this one held my attention all the way through, and a stop at layoutlounge did the same, that is a strong endorsement coming from me because I am usually quick to bounce when content gets repetitive or fails to deliver on its initial promise made in the headline.

  • JamesHok · 08/29/2026 at 4:00 AM

  • Deannub · 08/29/2026 at 4:02 AM

    Easy to recommend without reservations, the site delivers on every promise it implicitly makes, and a look at campcourier kept that same standard going, the kind of consistency that earns trust over time rather than chasing it through aggressive marketing is what I see here and it is appreciated greatly by this particular reader today.

  • Ernestoaboft · 08/29/2026 at 4:05 AM

    A piece that ended with a clean landing rather than fading out, and a look at layoutlounge maintained the same crisp conclusions, endings that resolve rather than dissolve are a sign of careful structural thinking and this site has clearly invested in how its pieces conclude rather than letting them simply run out of energy.

  • DestinWex · 08/29/2026 at 4:05 AM

    Worth pointing out that the writer made the topic feel more interesting than I had been expecting, and a look at filterfactory continued that elevation effect, content that improves the apparent quality of its subject through skilled treatment is doing something real and this site has clearly developed that kind of editorial alchemy throughout.

  • BillySot · 08/29/2026 at 4:06 AM

  • Jeffersonurbaf · 08/29/2026 at 4:06 AM

    Found the writing surprisingly fresh for what is by now a well covered topic, and a stop at yarrowyield kept that freshness going across the related pages, original perspective on familiar ground is hard to come by and this site has clearly earned its place in the conversation rather than just rehashing old ideas.

  • https://www.suelopelvicofemalecare.es/guia-rapida-para-entender-el-draw-no-bet-en-apuestas/ · 08/29/2026 at 4:10 AM

  • Roberttug · 08/29/2026 at 4:12 AM

    ??????????? ???? ??????????: ??? ?????? ?????? ???????, ??? ???? ????? ?? ?????????? ????????. ??????????? ????? ???????? ? ??????? ??????????? — ??????????, ??????????? ? ??????????.
    ???????? ?????? – [url=https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-voronezh9.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ????? ?? ????? ???????[/url]

  • Ernestoaboft · 08/29/2026 at 4:12 AM

    Generally my attention drifts on long posts but this one held it through the end, and a stop at layoutlounge earned the same sustained focus, content that defeats my drift tendency is content with substantive pulling power and this site has demonstrated that pulling power across multiple pieces in a session that has now run quite long actually.

  • cricfy app download · 08/29/2026 at 4:12 AM

    Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the pictures
    on this blog loading? I’m trying to determine if its a problem on my
    end or if it’s the blog. Any feedback would
    be greatly appreciated.

  • DestinWex · 08/29/2026 at 4:13 AM

    Reading this in the time it took to drink half a cup of coffee, and a stop at filterfactory fit naturally into the second half, content that respects the rhythms of a typical morning is content with practical fit and this site has the kind of length and pacing that works for the way I actually read.

  • Goodinimer · 08/29/2026 at 4:16 AM

    ?????????? ?? ????? ? ?????? ??????????? ??? ???? ?? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ??????????? ????????????, ?????????? ?????????? ? ???????????? ????????. ? ?????? «??????» ??????? ?????????? ????????: ???????? ????????? ????????? ????????, ???????? ????????????????? ?????, ?????????? ????????, ??????? ??????????? ???????????, ??????????? ?????? ????????????? ??????? ? ?????? ????? ??????? ?????????? ?????? ???????. ??????????? ?????? ????? ??????????? ?? ???? ???? ? ?????????? ???????, ???? ????????? ????? ??????????? ???????????? ? ?????????? ???????? ????????????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – https://3.kapelnica-ot-zapoya-moskva0.ru/

  • Kapelnica ot zapoya_ljSa · 08/29/2026 at 4:18 AM

    ? ????? ?????? ??????. ???????? ?????? ????????. ????? ??????????, ???? ????????. ?? ??????? ?????? — ?????????? ?? ????? ? ?????-??????????. ??????????, ??? ????????. ???????????? ????????. ????????. ??????? «??????? ????????». ????? ???? ????? ?? ??? ??? ? ?????. ??????? ???? ??????. ??????????? ?? ???????? ? ????? ?????????? [url=https://narkolog.kapelnicza-ot-zapoya-sankt-peterburg-jsi.ru]https://narkolog.kapelnicza-ot-zapoya-sankt-peterburg-jsi.ru[/url] ????????, ?????????? ??? ?????? ??????. ?? ?????, ???? ?????? ??????. ?????? ?????!

  • Holdenjef · 08/29/2026 at 4:20 AM

    Started believing the writer knew the topic deeply by about the second paragraph, and a look at sheetstudio reinforced that confidence, the speed at which a writer establishes credibility through their writing is a useful quality signal and this writer establishes it quickly and quietly without resorting to credential dropping or self promotion.

  • Davidrip · 08/29/2026 at 4:20 AM

    ???????? ??? ????????? ? ????????, ???????? ????????? ????????? ??? ???????? ? ?????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://2.kodirovanie-ot-alkogolizma-moskva9.ru/]??????????? ?? ??????????? ?????? ????[/url]

  • HarleyRig · 08/29/2026 at 4:21 AM

    A small editorial detail caught my attention, the way headings related to body text, and a look at shiftperk maintained that careful relationship, structural details like that show up to readers who notice them and the writers here have clearly thought about every level of the piece rather than just the words.

  • DestinWex · 08/29/2026 at 4:22 AM

    Reading this in the time it took to drink half a cup of coffee, and a stop at filterfactory fit naturally into the second half, content that respects the rhythms of a typical morning is content with practical fit and this site has the kind of length and pacing that works for the way I actually read.

  • KelbyVes · 08/29/2026 at 4:24 AM

    Came here from a search and stayed for the side links because they were that interesting, and a stop at exchangeexpress took me even further into the site, the kind of organic exploration that good content invites is something most sites kill through aggressive interlinking and pushy navigation choices rather than relying on quality.

  • Roberttug · 08/29/2026 at 4:26 AM

    ??????? ? ??????????????? ??????? ? ???????? ?????????? ????????, ? ?????? ????????? ????????, ???????????? ??????????? ? ??????? ????????????? ???????????.
    ????????? ????? ?????? ??? – http://narkologicheskaya-klinika-voronezh9.ru/

  • JuanMum · 08/29/2026 at 4:27 AM

    Glad I clicked through from where I did because this turned out to be worth the time spent, and after laptoplegend I had a fuller picture, the kind of content that earns its visitors through delivering value rather than chasing them through aggressive advertising or constant pop ups appearing everywhere on the screen lately.

  • Tannerzibly · 08/29/2026 at 4:27 AM

    Felt the writer was being honest with the reader which is rare enough that I want to acknowledge it, and a look at webolive continued that honest feel, content built on actual knowledge rather than aggregated summaries is something I value highly and rarely come across in regular searches on the open internet these days.

  • Kapelnica ot zapoya_rjSa · 08/29/2026 at 4:27 AM

    ? ????? ?????? ??????. ???????, ???????? ?? ??????, ????? ????????? ???? ?????. ?? ?? ???, ?? ????. ?????? ??????? ????? — ??????? ???????????? ? ????? ??????. ???????? ????? 40 ?????. ????? ?????? ? ???????. ??? — ??? ???????. ??? ??????. ????????, ??? ???. ?????? ? ????, ??? ??????. ?????????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? [url=https://narkolog.kapelnicza-ot-zapoya-sankt-peterburg-jsi.ru]?????????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ????[/url] ?? ?????? — ??????? ? ???? ??? ?????-??????????. ???????? — ??? ????? ??????. ?? ?? ????!

  • ??????? ????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?? ?????? · 08/29/2026 at 4:28 AM

    ????????? ??????????????? ??????? ?? ???? ? ?????? ???????? ??? ?????? ?
    ?????????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ? ??? ??? ????????? ???????? ?????? ? ???????? ??????????!

  • HarleyRig · 08/29/2026 at 4:30 AM

    Thanks for keeping the writing direct without losing the warmth that makes content feel human, and a stop at shiftperk carried both qualities forward, balancing professionalism and personality is a rare skill and the writers here have clearly figured out how to consistently land it across many posts which I notice.

  • GermanGoasp · 08/29/2026 at 4:33 AM

    Decided to read this site for a while before forming a verdict, and the verdict after several pages is positive, and a stop at versatrove continued that pattern, judging a site requires more than one post and giving sites a fair sample is something I try to do for promising candidates rather than rushing to dismiss.

  • Milopep · 08/29/2026 at 4:33 AM

    Refreshing to read something where the words actually mean something instead of filling space, and a stop at dataclean kept that going, the writing here trusts the reader to follow along without endless repetition or constant reminders of what was already said earlier in the post which I appreciate.

  • IssacNew · 08/29/2026 at 4:38 AM

    Now adjusting my mental list of reliable sites for this topic, and a stop at laptoplegend reinforced the adjustment, the small ongoing curation work of maintaining trusted sources is one of the actual practical activities of careful reading and this site has earned a permanent place on my list for this particular subject.

  • Narkologicheskii stacionar_dbKi · 08/29/2026 at 4:38 AM

    ??????, ??? ?????????? ? ???????????? ???? ??????????. ????????? ? ???? ? ?????? ??? ?????? ????. ?? ????????, ????? ??????? ????. ? ????? ?????, ??? ????? ????????????? ????? ???? ????. ??????? ??????????? ? ?????????? — ??, ??? ??????? ??????? ????? ? ?????. ?? ???????? ???????????? ?????? ????. ????? ????? ?? ??? ???????? ??-???????. ?? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ? ????????? — ??? ?? ????????? ???????. ??? ?????? ? ?????????. ? ????, ??? ??? ????????? ??????????. ????????? ??? ??????????? [url=https://zapoy.narkologicheskij-staczionar-moskva-qtx.ru]https://zapoy.narkologicheskij-staczionar-moskva-qtx.ru[/url] ?? ?????? — ????????? ?????????? ? ?????????? ??? ???????. ??????????? ????? ?????? ?????. ???????? ??? ? ???????? ???????? ????????!

  • NolanTop · 08/29/2026 at 4:38 AM

    Decided to read this site for a while before forming a verdict, and the verdict after several pages is positive, and a stop at chicchisel continued that pattern, judging a site requires more than one post and giving sites a fair sample is something I try to do for promising candidates rather than rushing to dismiss.

  • Kapelnica ot zapoya_zner · 08/29/2026 at 4:39 AM

    ? ????? — ?? ??? ?? ?????? ????? ?????. ??????? ?? ?????? ??????? ????????. ??? ???? ???? ?? ?????. ??? ??????? ? ????? ?????? ?????? — ???????? ???????????? ? ???????? ???????. ????? ???????? ? ??? ?? ????. ????????? ???????, ????? ?????????. ??? ?????? ????????. ??? ?????????. ??????? ???????. ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? ???? [url=https://alkogolizm.kapelnicza-ot-zapoya-sankt-peterburg-jsi.ru]?????????? ?? ???????? ?? ????[/url] ?? ?????? — ??? ???????? ??? ?????-??????????. ????????? ???, ???? ??? ????? ????????????. ??? ?????????!

  • Deankah · 08/29/2026 at 4:40 AM

    Reading this prompted a small note in my reference file, and a stop at blog33only prompted another, the rare site that contributes useful nuggets to my own working knowledge rather than just consuming my attention is worth the time investment many times over compared to the usual pile of forgettable scroll content.

  • Sethnougs · 08/29/2026 at 4:41 AM

    A piece that handled multiple complications without becoming confused, and a look at clevercheckout continued that organisational clarity, holding multiple threads in a single piece without losing any of them is a sign of skilled writing and this site has clearly developed the editorial discipline to manage complexity without sacrificing readability throughout.

  • Georgeatoft · 08/29/2026 at 4:43 AM

    ????? ?? ????? ? ??????? ? ??????????????? ??????? «??????» — ??? ??????????? ??????? ??????????? ????????????, ????????????? ???????? ? ????????? ? ?????????? ????????????? ????????? ?????????. ??????????? ?????? ???????? ?????????????: ???????? ????? ???????? ?????? ? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ?????????? ?????????????? ? ????????? ??? ??????? ?????????. ??????? ??????? ?????? — ???????????? ????????, ??????????? ?????????, ?????????????? ?????? ????????????? ??????? ? ?????????? ???????? ????????????. ???? ????????? ?????????? ????????, ???????????? ?????, ???????, ??????? ??????????? ???????????, ?????????? ????????, ?????, ??????????? ??????? ? ?????????? ???? ??????? ???????????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – [url=https://3.vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/]vrach-vyvod-iz-zapoya[/url]

  • Jeffersonurbaf · 08/29/2026 at 4:45 AM

    A small thank you note from me to the team behind this work, the post earned it, and a stop at yarrowyield suggested more thanks would be in order over time, recognising the people who do good writing online is something I try to remember to do because the alternative is silence and silence rewards mediocrity unfortunately.

  • GermanGoasp · 08/29/2026 at 4:45 AM

    Glad the writer did not feel compelled to cover every possible angle of the topic, focus is a virtue, and a stop at versatrove reflected the same disciplined scope, knowing what to leave out is half of what makes good writing good and this post has clearly been edited with that principle in mind.

  • Milopep · 08/29/2026 at 4:47 AM

    Felt the writer was being honest with the reader which is rare enough that I want to acknowledge it, and a look at dataclean continued that honest feel, content built on actual knowledge rather than aggregated summaries is something I value highly and rarely come across in regular searches on the open internet these days.

  • Narkologicheskii stacionar_xgKi · 08/29/2026 at 4:48 AM

    ??????, ??? ?????????? ? ???????????? ???? ??????????. ??? ???? ??? ??? ????????? ???????. ?? ???????? ?????? ??? ???? — ?? ??????????????. ?????????? ???? ???????, ????????? ????????? ???????. ?????????????????? ??????? ? ?????????????? ??????????? — ??? ???? ?????? ????????, ??????? ?? ???????. ?? ???????? ???????????? ?????? ????. ?? ????? ???? ???, ??? ??? ??????. ??????????? — ??????. ?????? ?????????, ??? ??????? ????????. ?? ????? ????? ? ?????? ? ?????? ? ??????. ??????? ???????????????? ?????????? [url=https://zapoy.narkologicheskij-staczionar-moskva-qtx.ru]https://zapoy.narkologicheskij-staczionar-moskva-qtx.ru[/url] ?? ?????? — ????????? ?????????? ? ?????????? ??? ???????. ???????, ?????????, ??????????. ???????? ??? ? ???????? ???????? ????????!

  • Kendrickaxock · 08/29/2026 at 4:49 AM

    Worth flagging this post as worth a careful read rather than a casual skim, and a stop at inboxinstitute earned the same careful approach, the few sites that warrant slower reading are sites I now treat differently from the daily content stream and this one has clearly moved into that elevated treatment category.

  • Kalebhaw · 08/29/2026 at 4:49 AM

    Reading this in segments because the day was busy, and the post survived the fragmented attention well, and a stop at islamabadimports held up similarly under interrupted reading, content that can withstand modern distracted reading patterns rather than requiring a perfect block of focused time is increasingly the kind I prefer.

  • IssacNew · 08/29/2026 at 4:50 AM

    Liked that the post resisted a sales pitch ending, and a stop at laptoplegend maintained the no pitch approach, content that ends without trying to convert me into a customer or subscriber is content that has confidence in its own value and this site is clearly playing the long game on reader trust.

  • Robertblony · 08/29/2026 at 4:51 AM

    ?????? ????? ???????? ????????, ? ?????????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://1.vyvod-iz-zapoya-balashiha5.ru/]vyvod-iz-alkogolnogo-zapoya[/url]

  • GermanGoasp · 08/29/2026 at 4:52 AM

    Easy to recommend without reservations, the site delivers on every promise it implicitly makes, and a look at versatrove kept that same standard going, the kind of consistency that earns trust over time rather than chasing it through aggressive marketing is what I see here and it is appreciated greatly by this particular reader today.

  • WinstonJem · 08/29/2026 at 4:52 AM

    Most of the time I feel the open web is in decline and then I find a site like this, and a stop at jeannunez reinforced that mood lift, the cumulative effect of finding occasional excellent independent content versus the cumulative effect of finding mostly mediocre content is real for the long term reader maintaining web habits today.

  • IssacNew · 08/29/2026 at 4:56 AM

    Decided to read this site for a while before forming a verdict, and the verdict after several pages is positive, and a stop at laptoplegend continued that pattern, judging a site requires more than one post and giving sites a fair sample is something I try to do for promising candidates rather than rushing to dismiss.

1 3,586 3,587 3,588 3,589 3,590 3,607

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives