
the thread where this came from
I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.
SCS voting guide via Phatt
FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.
FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.
FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE
Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.
FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE
Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.
FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.
County Commisioner
I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.
FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX
I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.
FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE
Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).
Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups
The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.
Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.
Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund
This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.
Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs
This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.
Sure.
Amendment 4: Probation and Parole
The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.
This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.
Amendment 5: Early childhood education
This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.
The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.
Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.
This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.
Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements
This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.
Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.
This link explains this Amendments well.
http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt
Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.
If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…
I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.
Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.
Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.
Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.
This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.
No tags

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
« Previous 1 … 3,522 3,523 3,524 3,525 3,526 … 3,555 Next »Irvingtaurn · 08/26/2026 at 7:51 PM
Reading this gave me the rare experience of fully agreeing with all the conclusions, and a stop at warewell continued that agreement pattern, content that aligns with my existing views without seeming designed to do so is just content that happens to be reasonable and this site reads as reasonable rather than ideological mostly.
KadeJogue · 08/26/2026 at 7:51 PM
Now considering whether the post would translate well into a different form, and a look at synapseflow suggested similar versatility, content that could move into other media without losing its substance is content that has been built around ideas rather than around format and this site reads as idea first throughout posts.
Xn88 · 08/26/2026 at 7:53 PM
If you would like to get much from this piece of writing then you have to apply such strategies
to your won web site.
Eddiesam · 08/26/2026 at 7:53 PM
Liked the way the post balanced confidence and humility, and a stop at swiftshoppery maintained the same balance, knowing when to assert and when to acknowledge uncertainty is a sign of mature thinking and the writers here have clearly developed that calibration through what I assume is years of careful work on their craft.
Proekt pereplanirovki kvartiri_vjOt · 08/26/2026 at 7:54 PM
????? ????? — ??? ?????????? ??????? ??????. ???? ??????? ????????? ???????. ????? ??????? ??????, ???????? ? ? ????????? ????????????. ???????????? ?????????????? ? ???????? — ??????? ??? ??????, ????????? ?????????. ??????? «?????» ???????. ?????? ? ???? ???? ??? ????????? ??? ???????. ????????? ?????? ?????????????? ???????? [url=https://kvartiry.soglasovanie-pereplanirovki-xkd.ru]https://kvartiry.soglasovanie-pereplanirovki-xkd.ru[/url] ??????????, ???? ?????????? ?????? ?????????????? ??? ??????. ???? ?? ?????? ???? ???????? ? ??????????? — ?????????? ????????????. ?????? ?????????? ? ??????? — ? ??? ??????? ???????!
Victoria · 08/26/2026 at 7:54 PM
top 3 kasyn z najwy?szym rtp
my web-site: kasyno dla nowych graczy ranking
(Victoria)
Goodinimer · 08/26/2026 at 7:55 PM
????? ?????????? ?? ?????, ?????????? ???????? ?????? ? ???????? ?????. ??????????? ?????? ????????? ??????????? ????????: ??????? ?????? ?????, ??????? ??? ????????, ????? ??? ????????? ????? ????????, ??????? ?? ??????????? ???????? ? ????? ????????? ???????????? ?????????. ??? ?????????? ????????? ??????? ?????? ??????????? ????????, ?????? ????????????? ???? ?????????? ????????.
???????????? ? ???????? – [url=https://n.vyvod-iz-zapoya-kemerovo18.ru/]????? ?? ????? ????????[/url]
Kasyno Mobile Z Bonusem Na Start · 08/26/2026 at 7:57 PM
kody do kasyn bez depozytu
Review my web page – Kasyno Mobile Z Bonusem Na Start
Linwoodtruct · 08/26/2026 at 8:01 PM
Now appreciating the small but real way this post improved my afternoon, and a stop at softgiant extended that small improvement effect, content that produces measurable positive impact on the texture of a reading day is content with real value and this site is producing those small positive impacts at a sustainable rate apparently.
olymp_ysEt · 08/26/2026 at 8:01 PM
olymp ????????????? ???????? [url=https://olymp88094.shop]https://olymp88094.shop[/url]
Barrywaype · 08/26/2026 at 8:02 PM
Now adjusting my expectations upward for the topic based on this post, and a stop at kinetkey continued that bar raising effect, content that resets what I think is possible on a subject is doing real work in shaping my standards and this site is providing those bar raising experiences at a notable rate during sessions.
Pipeproof.Thefvgtest.com · 08/26/2026 at 8:03 PM
kasyno 5 euro ranking kasyn z bonusem na start [Pipeproof.Thefvgtest.com] start
Significado 1X2 apuestas · 08/26/2026 at 8:03 PM
Significado 1X2 apuestas uruguay corea
Edwinzenda · 08/26/2026 at 8:04 PM
?????? ????? ???????? ????????, ? ?????????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????.
?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://3.vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/]vyvod-iz-zapoya[/url]
Jamesdussy · 08/26/2026 at 8:07 PM
???? ??????? ????????? ???? ????? ????, ????????????? ?? ??????? ?????? ???????? ???????????? ? ???????????. ?????????? ??????? ????? ??? ?????????? ??????. ????????????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ??????????? ??????? ? ??????, ????? ?? ??????????????.
???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://2.vyvod-iz-zapoya-balashiha5.ru/]pomoshch-vyvod-iz-zapoya[/url]
Berniece · 08/26/2026 at 8:08 PM
sportwetten für heute
My web blog … tipico live wetten basketball – Berniece –
basketball wett tipps · 08/26/2026 at 8:09 PM
basketball wett tipps wetten heute
KendrickTar · 08/26/2026 at 8:09 PM
Genuinely useful read, the points are practical and easy to apply right away, and a quick look at youtubeyard confirmed that this site is consistent in that approach, looking forward to digging through the rest of it when I get the chance to sit down properly later in the week or this weekend.
Keaganeraph · 08/26/2026 at 8:10 PM
The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at sparkrunway kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.
Barrywaype · 08/26/2026 at 8:11 PM
Solid quality, the kind of work that holds up to a careful read rather than a quick skim, and a quick look at kinetkey kept that standard going strong, content that rewards attention rather than punishing it is something I appreciate more and more these days online across nearly every topic I follow.
JaylenMug · 08/26/2026 at 8:12 PM
Comfortable read, finished it without realising how much time had passed, and a look at shiftsync pulled me into more pages the same way, the absence of friction in good content lets time disappear and that is one of the highest compliments I can pay any piece of writing I find online during a regular search session.
Aidanusack · 08/26/2026 at 8:13 PM
A piece that exhibited the kind of patience that good writing requires, and a look at pantrypebble continued that patient quality, hurried writing is easy to spot and this site reads as having been written without time pressure which produces a different feel than the rushed content that dominates much of the modern blog space.
GeraldSep · 08/26/2026 at 8:13 PM
????????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ?????????, ??????? ????????? ???? ?? ????????? ??????????.
???????? ???? ????????? — ???? ???????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ???????, ???????????? ??????????? ???? ??? ????? ???????.
??? ?????? ??????? ????????????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????????, ????? ? ??????? ??????????.
?????????????? ??????? ????????????? ?????????? ???????, ??????? ????? ? ??????????? ???????? ????? ????????.
????? ?? ???????
Linwoodtruct · 08/26/2026 at 8:14 PM
The examples really helped me grasp the points faster than abstract descriptions would have, and a stop at softgiant added a few more practical illustrations that drove the message home, the kind of writing that knows its readers learn better through concrete situations rather than vague generalities is rare and worth recognising clearly.
DomenicAgelM · 08/26/2026 at 8:14 PM
If I had to summarise the editorial sensibility of this site in a few words it would be careful and human, and a look at coralcrate extended that summary feeling, capturing the essence of a sites approach in brief is hard but this site has a clear enough identity that the summary comes naturally enough.
MiguelREUMN · 08/26/2026 at 8:17 PM
??? ?????? ??? ????????? ???????????? ???????? ???????? ????? ???????? ??????? ?? ????. ???? ? ???????? ????????? ????????, ??????, ?????????? ????????-?????????? ???????????? ??? ????????? ????????, ?????????? ??????? ? ??????????. ??? ???????????????? ?????? ????? ????? ?????? ??????. ????????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ? ??? ????????????? ???????? ??????????????? ? ????????.
????????? – [url=https://s.vivod-iz-zapoya-v-sankt-peterburge16.ru/]?????????? ????? ?? ????? ? ?????-??????????[/url]
Ulyssesmaype · 08/26/2026 at 8:19 PM
Decided to read more before commenting and the more I read the more I wanted to say something, and a stop at webcreek pushed that impulse further, when content provokes the urge to participate rather than just consume it is doing something quite specific and worth recognising clearly when it happens during reading.
Irvingtaurn · 08/26/2026 at 8:20 PM
Found this via a link from another piece I was reading and the click was worth it, and a stop at warewell extended the value across more material, the open web still rewards clicking through citations when the underlying writers care about each other work and this site clearly belongs to that network.
Linwoodtruct · 08/26/2026 at 8:20 PM
If the topic interests you at all this is a place to spend time, and a look at softgiant reinforced that recommendation, the broader question of where to invest topical reading time is one this site answers convincingly through the consistent quality across multiple pieces I have sampled during the current reading session today.
Keithcef · 08/26/2026 at 8:21 PM
???????????????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ?????? ??? ???????????? ?????. ?????? ???? ????????? ????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ???????? ?????????? ?????????????, ????????? ???, ?????? ????????, ??????, ??????? ? ????????. ???????? ????????? ???????? ??????????????? ????? ??????? ???????. ???? ??????? ???? ?????????, ???? ???????? ???????????? ?? ?????. ???? ????????? ???????? ???????? ????????, ???????? ??????????? ??????? ? ??????????.
???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://3.vyvod-iz-zapoya-moskva011.ru/]vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-moskva[/url]
Barrywaype · 08/26/2026 at 8:22 PM
Glad I clicked through from where I did because this turned out to be worth the time spent, and after kinetkey I had a fuller picture, the kind of content that earns its visitors through delivering value rather than chasing them through aggressive advertising or constant pop ups appearing everywhere on the screen lately.
LorenzoFutle · 08/26/2026 at 8:22 PM
A piece that ended with a clean landing rather than fading out, and a look at sandracraig maintained the same crisp conclusions, endings that resolve rather than dissolve are a sign of careful structural thinking and this site has clearly invested in how its pieces conclude rather than letting them simply run out of energy.
Donovanjus · 08/26/2026 at 8:24 PM
Reading this prompted me to subscribe to my first newsletter in months, and a stop at nearbyneeds confirmed the subscribe was the right call, content that earns a newsletter signup is content that has cleared a higher trust bar than a casual visit and this site has clearly earned that level of commitment from me.
https://reclamadortrafico.es · 08/26/2026 at 8:24 PM
ofertas de empleo apuestas en vivo tenis (https://reclamadortrafico.es) deportivas
???? · 08/26/2026 at 8:25 PM
I’ve been browsing online more than 3 hours as of late, yet I
never discovered any fascinating article like yours. It’s beautiful worth sufficient for me.
In my opinion, if all site owners and bloggers made excellent content
material as you did, the net shall be much more useful than ever before.
Georgevoino · 08/26/2026 at 8:25 PM
??????????????? ?????? ? ??????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????????. ??????? ????? ????????? ????? ???????????? ?????, ? ???????? ??? ????????, ????? ?????????????? ?????????? ? ?????????? ????????? ?? ??????????. ? ?????? ? ????????????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ????. ??? ???????, ?????????, ??????? ????????-?????????? ??????????, ????????????? ??? ?????? ????? ????????? ????????? ???? ??????? ?????? ? ?????????? ??????.
?????? ?????? – [url=https://a.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/]????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ????[/url]
JaredNoill · 08/26/2026 at 8:25 PM
Genuinely useful read, the points are practical and easy to apply right away, and a quick look at trusttech confirmed that this site is consistent in that approach, looking forward to digging through the rest of it when I get the chance to sit down properly later in the week or this weekend.
GeraldSep · 08/26/2026 at 8:25 PM
????????? ?????? ????????? ??? ???????????? ?????????, ??????? ?????????? ????????????? ???? ?? ?????????? ??????????.
???????? ???? ????????? — ????????? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ????????, ?????????? ????? ??????????? ??????.
??????? ????????? ????????????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ????????????? ?????????, ????? ? ??????? ?????.
???????? ???????? ??????????? ?????????? ???????, ???????? ??????? ? ??????? ????????? ?????????????.
????? ????????? ???? ??????
GeraldSep · 08/26/2026 at 8:27 PM
?? ???????????? ????? ???????????? ???????, ??????? ?????????? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ???????.
???????? ?????? ????????? — ????????? ???????? ?? ??? ?????? ????, ??????????? ????? ??????????? ??????.
??????? ????????? ??????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????????, ????????? ? ???????? ??????????.
??????????? ???????? ????????????? ??????? ???????, ??????? ????? ? ??????? ???????? ????? ???????.
?????? ?? ?????
Linwoodtruct · 08/26/2026 at 8:28 PM
Skipped past the first paragraph thinking it was setup and had to come back when the rest referenced it, and a stop at softgiant similarly rewarded careful reading from the start, content where every paragraph carries weight is content I now know to read from the beginning rather than skipping ahead.
olymp_ivEt · 08/26/2026 at 8:28 PM
olymp plinko ???? [url=http://olymp88094.shop]olymp plinko ????[/url]
Donnuazy · 08/26/2026 at 8:28 PM
Reading this in pieces during a long afternoon and finding it consistently rewarding, and a stop at blog44marriages fit naturally into the same fragmented reading pattern, sites whose posts can be read in segments without losing the thread are well suited to how I actually read these days and this one is built well.
Irvingtaurn · 08/26/2026 at 8:30 PM
Found this via a link from another piece I was reading and the click was worth it, and a stop at warewell extended the value across more material, the open web still rewards clicking through citations when the underlying writers care about each other work and this site clearly belongs to that network.
Keaganeraph · 08/26/2026 at 8:30 PM
Reading this confirmed a small detail I had been uncertain about, and a stop at sparkrunway provided the source for further checking, content that supports verification through citations or links rather than just asserting facts is more trustworthy and this site has clearly built its credibility through that kind of verifiable approach consistently.
GeraldSep · 08/26/2026 at 8:33 PM
??????? ???????? ???????????? ???????, ??????? ????????? ???? ?? ?????????? ?????.
????????? ???? ??????? — ???????????? ???????? ?? ??? ?????? ???????, ?????????? ????? ??????????? ??????.
?????????????? ?? ????????? ????? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????????, ????? ? ??????? ???????.
?????????????? ???????? ??????????? ?????????? ???????, ???????? ??????? ? ??????????? ???????? ????? ???????.
?????? ???????????? ???????
LorenzoFutle · 08/26/2026 at 8:34 PM
Picked up a couple of new ideas here that I can actually try out, and after my visit to sandracraig I have even more notes saved, this is the kind of resource that pays you back for the time you spend on it which is rare to come across in this corner of the web.
Vivod iz zapoya na domy_ioMn · 08/26/2026 at 8:34 PM
????? ???????? ?????? ???. ?? ??????? ????????? ??? ??????. ?????? ???????: «?????? ????». ?????? ???? ???? — ??? ?????, ??????? ???? ?????. ?????????? ?? ????? — ??????, ??? ????????? ??????. ????????, ??? ??????. ???? ????????????. ????? ?? ?????? — ?? ???. ????????, ??? ???????. ??? ?????? ? ?????????. ? ??? ??????, ??? ????? ?????????. ????? ????? ?? ??? [url=https://detoks.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-qzf.ru]????? ????? ?? ???[/url] ??? ??? ???????? ? ???? ??? ???????. ?????? ?????? ?????. ?? ??????????!
Audiolibrosnuriarodo.es · 08/26/2026 at 8:35 PM
casas de apuestas De peleas ufc – Audiolibrosnuriarodo.es – legales en españa
Goodinimer · 08/26/2026 at 8:37 PM
???????? ??? ????????? ? ????????, ???????? ????????? ????????? ??? ???????? ? ?????.
???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://n.vyvod-iz-zapoya-kemerovo18.ru/]???????? ????? ?? ????? ????????[/url]
JosephGaugs · 08/26/2026 at 8:38 PM
?????? ????? ???????? ????????, ? ?????????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????.
?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://1.vyvod-iz-zapoya-balashiha5.ru/]http://1.vyvod-iz-zapoya-balashiha5.ru/[/url]