
the thread where this came from
I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.
SCS voting guide via Phatt
FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.
FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.
FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE
Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.
FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE
Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.
FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.
County Commisioner
I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.
FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX
I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.
FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE
Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes
FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).
Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups
The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.
Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.
Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund
This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.
Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs
This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.
Sure.
Amendment 4: Probation and Parole
The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.
This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.
Amendment 5: Early childhood education
This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.
The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.
Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.
This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.
Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements
This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.
Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.
This link explains this Amendments well.
http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt
Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.
If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…
I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.
Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.
Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.
Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.
This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.
No tags

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
« Previous 1 … 3,480 3,481 3,482pinco_kxKi · 08/25/2026 at 6:55 AM
pinco bonus kodu daxil etm? [url=pinco82807.shop]pinco bonus kodu daxil etm?[/url]
Terrelltap · 08/25/2026 at 6:56 AM
Most posts I read end up forgotten within a day but this one is sticking, and a look at ravennet extended that lingering effect, content that survives the immediate moment of reading rather than evaporating is content with genuine retention quality and this site has been producing memorable pieces at a rate notable across my reading.
Cadenfap · 08/25/2026 at 6:56 AM
Came back to this an hour later to reread a specific section, and a quick visit to victorkelly also drew a second look, content that pulls you back rather than letting you move on permanently is the kind I want to fill my browser bookmarks with in 2026 and beyond as the open internet evolves.
AlexisSow · 08/25/2026 at 6:59 AM
??????? ??????? ?? ???????????? ???????????? ????????, ?????????, ???????? ????????, ????????? ?????? ? ??????, ??????? ??????????? ??????????? ? ?????? ?????? ????????. ???? ???? ?????? ??????? ????????? ?????????? ??????? ???????????? ?????, ????????? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ??????? ????????. ???????????? ??????? ??????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ?????????????? ?????? ?????????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ?????????.
???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://v.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/]????? ?? ????? ????[/url]
Darrengen · 08/25/2026 at 7:02 AM
Good clean post, no errors and no awkward phrasing that breaks the reading flow, and a stop at blog33mouth kept the same standard, definitely the kind of editorial care that earns a return visit because it tells me the writer is paying attention to details that matter to readers rather than just rushing publication.
Narkologicheskaya pomosh_paen · 08/25/2026 at 7:04 AM
????? ?? ??????????? — ????? ?????? ??? ??????. ???????? ?????? ???? — ?????? ???? ?????. ????? ???? ?????? — ?????????? ?????? ?? ???? ? ?????? ?????????. ?????????????, ???? ? ?????????. ????????, ?????? ????????? — ??? ????. ???????? — ??? ???????. ???? — ??????????. ????? ????????? — ?????? ????????. ??????? ??????????????? ?????? [url=https://zapoy.narkologicheskaya-pomoshh-nizhnij-novgorod.ru]https://zapoy.narkologicheskaya-pomoshh-nizhnij-novgorod.ru[/url] ?? ?????? — ???????? ? ?????????. ????????? ? ????????. ???? ???????. ?????????????!
Jaxonbyday · 08/25/2026 at 7:05 AM
Really clear writing, the kind that makes you want to share the link with someone who has been asking about the topic, and a quick browse through trendtally only made me more sure of that, the information here stays useful long after the first read is done which says a lot.
MaxwellSKIMB · 08/25/2026 at 7:06 AM
If the topic interests you at all this is a place to spend time, and a look at visionaryvista reinforced that recommendation, the broader question of where to invest topical reading time is one this site answers convincingly through the consistent quality across multiple pieces I have sampled during the current reading session today.
chicken-road_ljen · 08/25/2026 at 7:06 AM
chicken road bd apk download link [url=https://chicken-road22171.shop/]chicken road bd apk download link[/url]
RonaldJet · 08/25/2026 at 7:07 AM
????? ?? ????? ? ?????-?????????? — ???????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ?????????? ???????????? ????????, ??????????? ???????? ? ?????????? ??????????? ????????????. ??????? ????? ??????????? ?? ???? ???? ? ???????. ???????? ????????? ????????? ????????, ????????????????? ?????, ?????? ???????????, ??????????? ??????? ? ????????? ??????? ? ?????? ????? ??????????? ???????. ??? ??????? ????????? ??????????? ??????????, ??????????????? ???????, ???????????? ? ????????? ???????, ????????-?????????? ???????, ?????? ? ?????????? ???????.
?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://v.vivod-iz-zapoya-v-sankt-peterburge16.ru/]????????? ????? ?? ????? ? ?????-??????????[/url]
Vivod iz zapoya na domy_xxot · 08/25/2026 at 7:08 AM
??????????? ???????? — ??????? ? ????? ??? ????????? ????. ?????? ?? ????????? — ? ?????? ????? ??????. ????? ???? ??????? — ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ? ????? ??????. ?????????? ????? ???. ?????? ????????. ??????????? ????????? — ??????????. ?????? ???????????. ??? ??????. ?????????? ?? ??? ??? ?? ???????? [url=https://narkolog.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-sankt-peterburg-hnd.ru]?????????? ?? ??? ??? ?? ????????[/url] ??? ???????? ? ???? ??? ?????? ??????. ??? ??????????? — ?????????????. ????? ????????? ????? ?????. ??? ??????, ??? ?????. ??? ? ?????-?????????? — ??????????. ???? ????!
chicken-road_guen · 08/25/2026 at 7:08 AM
chicken road Bangladesh casino site [url=http://chicken-road22171.shop/]http://chicken-road22171.shop/[/url]
??????????? ???? · 08/25/2026 at 7:12 AM
I was able to find good information from your blog posts.
Vivod iz zapoya na domy_gqOn · 08/25/2026 at 7:13 AM
? ????? ???? — ????? ????? ????????. ????? ????????? — ?????? ?????. ???????? ??? ??????? — ?????????????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ????. ????????? ???????????. ???????? ??????? ?????? — ??? ?????????. ?????? ?????? — ? ???. ????????????? ?????-????. ???????? ?????????. ??????? ??? ???????? — ????????? ????????. ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? [url=https://alkogolizm-x9w.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-cde.ru]https://alkogolizm-x9w.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-cde.ru[/url] ??? ? ?????? ??? — ????????? ????. ??? ? ??????? — ?????????? ???????. ????? — ??????. ?? ????????? ????!
Jaxonbyday · 08/25/2026 at 7:13 AM
Honest assessment after reading this twice is that it holds up under careful attention, and a look at trendtally extended that durability across more pages, content that survives a second read without revealing weak spots is rarer than the average reader probably realises and this site clearly cleared that bar.
NormanHof · 08/25/2026 at 7:15 AM
Now feeling slightly more optimistic about the state of independent writing online, and a stop at blog66approach extended that quiet optimism, sites like this one are the reason I have not given up on the open web entirely and finding them occasionally renews the case for paying attention to non algorithmic content sources today.
Floydsping · 08/25/2026 at 7:15 AM
One of the more thoughtful posts I have read recently on this topic, and a stop at readypixel added even more weight to that impression, this is genuinely good content that holds its own against far better known sites in the same space without trying to imitate any of them at all which I appreciate.
Vivod iz zapoya na domy_blma · 08/25/2026 at 7:15 AM
???????????? — ??????????? ??????? ????????. ??? ??????? ????, ? ??? ????? ???. ? ????????? ????? ???????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ????. ???? ??? ? ????. ?????? ?????????, ??????? ????? — ? ????????? ?????????. ???????????????. ??????? ??????. ?????????? ?????. ????? ???? ?????? — ????????????? ????????. ????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ???? [url=https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-cde.ru]????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ????[/url] ?? ?????? ??? ???????? ??? ?????? ??????. ??????????. ?? ?????? ?? ????. ???????? ???? ?????!
Pereplanirovka kvartir_snsn · 08/25/2026 at 7:16 AM
?????? ???????? ????? — ??? ?????????? ?? ??????????. ??????????? ??????? ?? ????? — ??? ?????? ?? ??????? ????????????????. ???????? ?????? — ??? ????? ????????? ?? ?????. ??????? ? ????????????? — ?????????????? ??????? ? ???????. ? ? ??????????????? ?????? — ??? ?????? ???????. ????? ?????????. ??????? ??????? ? ?????????. ?????????????? [url=https://moskva.pereplanirovka-kvartir-byn.ru]??????????????[/url] ?????????, ??????????, ?? ????????? ??? ??????. ? ????????????? ?????, ??? ?? ??????. ?????????? ???, ??? ????? ??? ??????
DominicCreah · 08/25/2026 at 7:16 AM
Picked up something useful for a side project, and a look at jefferyschmidt added another piece I will incorporate, content that connects to specific projects I am working on is content with practical utility and the practical utility of this site is showing up across multiple posts I have read in the last hour or so.
Rontup · 08/25/2026 at 7:16 AM
A clear case of writing that does not try to do too much in one post, and a look at powerplugshop maintained the same scoped discipline, posts that try to cover too much end up covering nothing well and this site has clearly chosen scope discipline as a core editorial principle which shows up clearly in what I read.