Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

169,147 Comments · Posted by beerorkid in lincoln, political

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

169,147 comments

  • NickValse · 08/21/2026 at 3:40 PM

    Most of the time I bounce off similar pages within seconds, and a stop at anchoratlas held me longer than I would have predicted, the ability to convert a likely bouncing visitor into an engaged reader is a quality signal and this site has demonstrated that conversion ability across multiple visits where I expected to bounce.

  • Skylarcetle · 08/21/2026 at 3:40 PM

    Useful reading material, the kind I can hand off to someone newer to the topic without worrying about confusing them, and a quick look at brightbento confirmed the same beginner friendly tone runs throughout the site which is great for sharing with people just starting their learning journey on this particular topic.

  • RoyAccof · 08/21/2026 at 3:42 PM

    A modest masterpiece in its own quiet way, and a look at luxfable confirmed the same quiet quality across the rest of the site, calling something a masterpiece is usually overstating but for content this carefully crafted the word feels appropriate even if the writers themselves would probably resist the label honestly.

  • EliHah · 08/21/2026 at 3:43 PM

    Even across multiple posts the writers voice has remained consistent in a way I appreciate, and a stop at makermerchant continued that voice, sites that maintain editorial consistency across many pieces have something most sites lack and this one has clearly worked out how to keep its voice steady across what reads as a growing archive.

  • Noahbot · 08/21/2026 at 3:44 PM

    Found a couple of useful angles in here I had not considered before reading carefully, and a quick stop at charmchoice added more, this is one of those sites where the value compounds the more you read rather than peaking at one viral post and then offering nothing else of substance afterwards which is common.

  • Rodolfobiari · 08/21/2026 at 3:44 PM

    Now adjusting my mental list of reliable sites for this topic, and a stop at freightfriendly reinforced the adjustment, the small ongoing curation work of maintaining trusted sources is one of the actual practical activities of careful reading and this site has earned a permanent place on my list for this particular subject.

  • AlfredoNeors · 08/21/2026 at 3:46 PM

    Easily one of the better explanations I have read on the topic, and a stop at shopsen pushed it even higher in my mental ranking of useful resources, the kind of site that beats the average not by trying harder but by simply caring more about what it puts out daily which always shows.

  • ShawnPeerM · 08/21/2026 at 3:48 PM

    Excellent post, balanced and well organised without showing off, and a stop at tuliptrade continued in that same vein, this site has clearly figured out the formula for content that works for readers rather than for search engine ranking signals which is harder than it sounds today and worth real recognition from anyone.

  • win-slots-get · 08/21/2026 at 3:51 PM

    It’s fascinating to see how fast space exploration is evolving these days. Based on the latest updates on [url=https://bing.com]current reports[/url], researchers are making major milestones in quantum computing applications. How do you feel about these developments? Are you optimistic moving forward?

  • Edwinvat · 08/21/2026 at 3:53 PM

    Now planning to share the link with a small group of readers I trust, and a look at gemgalleria suggested more material to share with the same group, recommending content into a curated circle requires confidence in the recommendation and this site is making me confident in those personal recommendations on multiple separate occasions now.

  • QuinnTiz · 08/21/2026 at 3:54 PM

    Speaking as someone who reads a lot on this topic this site has earned a high position in my source rankings, and a stop at devspring reinforced that ranking, the informal ranking of sources for a topic is something I maintain mentally and this site has moved into the upper portion of those rankings clearly.

  • JamesEsope · 08/21/2026 at 3:56 PM

    ?????? ????? ???????? ????????, ? ?????????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://3.vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/]skoraya-vyvod-iz-zapoya[/url]

  • Henryelell · 08/21/2026 at 3:56 PM

    ??? ???????? ????????? ????? ?????????? ?? ???????. ????????? ????? ???????? ????? ??????? ? ?????????, ?????? ?????????????? ??????? ????????? ???? ??? ?????? ???????? ? ???????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – [url=https://v.vivod-iz-zapoya-v-sankt-peterburge16.ru/]http://v.vivod-iz-zapoya-v-sankt-peterburge16.ru/[/url]

  • RayRot · 08/21/2026 at 3:58 PM

    Now organising my browser bookmarks to give this site easier access, and a look at pointport earned the same organisational priority, the small acts of digital housekeeping I do for sites I expect to use often are themselves a measure of trust and this site has triggered the trust based housekeeping behaviour from me clearly.

  • MatthewPok · 08/21/2026 at 3:58 PM

    This one is staying open in a tab for the rest of the day so I can come back and re read certain parts, and a look at adsetatelier suggests I will be doing the same with a few more pages here too, this is going to be a deep dive over the coming hours.

  • PrestonPoorn · 08/21/2026 at 3:59 PM

    Decided not to skim despite my usual habit and was rewarded for the discipline, and a stop at traveltrolley earned the same patient approach, training myself to recognise sites that warrant slower reading is part of being a careful online reader and this site is the kind that helps me practice that skill regularly.

  • SandyTrott · 08/21/2026 at 4:00 PM

    Well structured and easy to read, that combination is rarer than people think, and a stop at reachrun confirmed the same standard runs across the rest of the site, definitely the kind of place I will be coming back to when this topic comes up in conversation later again over the weeks ahead.

  • SidneyMycle · 08/21/2026 at 4:00 PM

    The headings made navigating the post simple even when I needed to find a specific section quickly, and a look at linkloomshop continued the same thoughtful structure, small details like clear headings show that someone is actually thinking about how the reader uses the page rather than just filling it for length alone.

  • Nickrox · 08/21/2026 at 4:03 PM

    Reading this prompted me to send the link to two different people for two different reasons, and a stop at appcreek provided ammunition for a third share, content that suits multiple audiences without being generic enough to be useless to any of them is genuinely valuable and this site has that multi audience quality clearly.

  • WilliamGeosy · 08/21/2026 at 4:05 PM

    ????????????? ??????? ???????? ??, ??? ?????????? ??????????????? ? ?????? ????? ???????? ?? ??????. ? SEO ??? ????????? ?? ???????? ???????? ??????????? ??????????, ??????? ????????? ??????? ? ???????, ????????? ????????? ??? ?????????? ????????? ????????: ???????? ???????? ??

  • Zachariahfaula · 08/21/2026 at 4:05 PM

    Skipped the related links section thinking I had read enough and then came back to it later when curiosity got the better of me, and a stop at solidrunway confirmed I should have just read it first, every section of this site appears to deserve careful attention rather than skipping past lazily.

  • MatthewPok · 08/21/2026 at 4:07 PM

    A piece that suggested careful editing without showing the marks of the editing, and a look at adsetatelier continued that invisible polish, the best editing disappears into the prose and this site reads as having been edited with skill that does not announce itself which is the highest compliment I can offer any blog content.

  • Skylarcetle · 08/21/2026 at 4:07 PM

    Useful reading material, the kind I can hand off to someone newer to the topic without worrying about confusing them, and a quick look at brightbento confirmed the same beginner friendly tone runs throughout the site which is great for sharing with people just starting their learning journey on this particular topic.

  • SamuelViase · 08/21/2026 at 4:08 PM

    Decided not to comment because the post said what needed saying, and a stop at softport continued that complete feel, content that does not invite obvious additions or corrections from readers is content that has been carefully considered and this site appears to consistently produce pieces that satisfy rather than provoke unnecessary follow ups.

  • Williamleast · 08/21/2026 at 4:09 PM

    ???????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???????????? ? ??????????? ?????: ?????, ????????? ??? ??????????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://a.vyvod-iz-zapoya-kemerovo18.ru/]?????? ????? ?? ????? ????????[/url]

  • Dennistox · 08/21/2026 at 4:09 PM

    ????? ????????? ?? ???? ???????? ? ??? ???????, ????? ??????? ????????? ? ?????????? ????????? ? ???? ?? ????? ???????????????? ? ?????????? ????????? ??? ??????????. ??????? ????????? ? ??????????? ????????????? ? ??????? ????????????? ??????????. ?????? ???????? ???? ????????, ?????? ?????? ?????????, ????????, ?????? ? ?????? ???????? ???????????. ??? ??????? ????????? ????? ??????????? ???????????? ???????, ??? ? ?????????????? ??????????????? ???????????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – [url=https://n.narkologicheskaya-klinika-sankt-peterburg14.ru/]??????????????? ??????? ??????????????? ????? ? ?????-??????????[/url]

  • JettSanna · 08/21/2026 at 4:11 PM

    Glad to find something on this topic that does not start with three paragraphs of throat clearing before getting to the point, and a stop at nauticalnook also dives right in, respect for the readers time shows up in small editorial choices like this and they add up to a real difference quickly.

  • PrestonPoorn · 08/21/2026 at 4:11 PM

    This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at traveltrolley kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.

  • Bruceenfof · 08/21/2026 at 4:11 PM

    ????? ???????? ??????? ?? ????, ?????????? ??????? ?????? ? ???????? ?????, ??????? ????????, ????????????????? ????? ? ???????? ??????. ???????? ?? ???? ???????? ???????? ? ?????, ???????? ??????? ??????????? ???????????, ????? ???????????? ? ????????? ?????????? ????????. ????? ??????????? ??????? ?? ????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://v.vivod-iz-zapoya-v-sankt-peterburge16.ru/]?????????? ????? ?? ????? ?????-?????????[/url]

  • Claytonnob · 08/21/2026 at 4:12 PM

    Adding this site to my regular reading list, the post earned that on its own, and a quick stop at tracerunway sealed the decision, the kind of place worth checking back with from time to time because it consistently produces material that holds up against a critical reading too which I really value.

  • Jessezonge · 08/21/2026 at 4:12 PM

    ????????????????? ????????? ??????? ?? ??????? ???????????? ? ???????????? ?????????. ? ????? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ???????? ????????? ???????? ?????, ? ?????? ????????? ????????? ????? ?????????? ??? ??????? ? ???????. ?????? ??????? ??????? ????? ??????? ?????? ??????????: ????????????? ??????? ???????????? ?? ??????????? ??????????, ? ????????????? ?? ??????????.
    ?????? ?????? – [url=https://2.vyvod-iz-zapoya-reutov4.ru/]????? ?? ????? ?????? ?????????[/url]

  • SidneyMycle · 08/21/2026 at 4:12 PM

    Really grateful for content like this, it does not waste my time and it does not insult my intelligence either, and a quick look at linkloomshop was the same, balanced respectful writing that makes a person feel welcome rather than rushed through pages of forced engagement just to keep clicking around.

  • JamesSmise · 08/21/2026 at 4:13 PM

    ????? ????? ?????? ?????????????????: ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ????, ? ? ????????? ? ??????? ?????? ??????????? — ?????? ? ??????. ??? ??????????????? ?????? ????????????, ??? ???? ??????????? ?????????? ??????????? ????????, ??????????? ?????????? ? ??????? ??????? ?????????. ???????? ??????????? ??????? ?????????? ? ???????? ???????? ???????, ????????? ? ????????, ????????????? ??????, ????? ? ????????????? ??????. ? ???????? ????????? ????-???????? ??????????, ????? ?? ??????? ?????? ???? ???? ?????????? ??????? ????????? ???????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://s.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/]?????? ????? ?? ????? ??????????[/url]

  • SandyTrott · 08/21/2026 at 4:13 PM

    Felt this in a way I cannot quite explain, the topic just hit different here, and a stop at reachrun continued in that vein, sometimes you find a site whose perspective lines up with how you have been thinking and reading their work feels like a small relief which I appreciated more than I expected.

  • Stephenbib · 08/21/2026 at 4:14 PM

    ? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ? ?????????????, ??????? ??????????? ?????? ? ???????? ??????? ??????. ???????? ??????, ????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ? ??? ?????? ???? ? ?????????????.
    ??? ???? — ???????? ????? – [url=https://vyezd-narkologa.ru/service/narkomaniya/ubod/]???? ? ?????? ????[/url]

  • aviator_bipt · 08/21/2026 at 4:15 PM

    aviator ?????? [url=http://aviator86613.icu/]http://aviator86613.icu/[/url]

  • PrestonPoorn · 08/21/2026 at 4:16 PM

    Worth flagging this post as worth a careful read rather than a casual skim, and a stop at traveltrolley earned the same careful approach, the few sites that warrant slower reading are sites I now treat differently from the daily content stream and this one has clearly moved into that elevated treatment category.

  • MatthewPok · 08/21/2026 at 4:18 PM

    Closed the tab and immediately reopened it ten minutes later because I wanted to reread a part, and a stop at adsetatelier drew the same return, content that pulls you back after closing it is doing something well beyond the average and worth marking as exceptional in my mental catalogue of reliable sites.

  • SandyTrott · 08/21/2026 at 4:19 PM

    Felt this in a way I cannot quite explain, the topic just hit different here, and a stop at reachrun continued in that vein, sometimes you find a site whose perspective lines up with how you have been thinking and reading their work feels like a small relief which I appreciated more than I expected.

  • SamuelViase · 08/21/2026 at 4:19 PM

    Reading carefully this time rather than scanning, and the depth shows up in places I missed first time around, and a look at softport rewarded the same careful approach, content that holds up to multiple reads is content I want more of in my regular rotation rather than disposable scroll fodder daily.

  • Walterham · 08/21/2026 at 4:20 PM

    When investigating modern online gaming portals, players frequently look for an exhaustive evaluation to comprehend what distinguishes an individual operator prevail within the industry https://thorfortune.web.app/ . Exploring the rich sphere of digital entertainment requires a close look at gaming options, safety protocols, as well as interface quality delivered by platforms like thorfortune casino online. Experienced enthusiasts assessing a new destination frequently review the promotional offers, handheld accessibility, and payment efficiency available at thor fortune online casino sites. Choosing a dependable site from the extensive catalog of virtual betting sites entails reviewing permits plus user service availability to secure a safe environment. An exhaustive platform assessment usually stresses the necessity for honest gaming rules, transparent terms, and smooth withdrawal processes that enhance extended gamer loyalty. Finally, participating via brands including casino thor fortune responsibly enables users to enjoy top-tier fun by keeping full oversight over their betting routines, making sure that each visit stays both engaging and safe across a compliant network. [url=https://stvincentiusgp.org/2025/01/27/sukacita-hut-paroki-ke-3/#comment-114694]Complete Thor Fortune Overview and Analysis[/url] [url=https://eosmeeting.com/how-to-protect-your-wealth-during-market-volatility/#comment-45992]Detailed Thor Fortune Casino Review and Analysis[/url] a5_56d3

  • Jaylenbal · 08/21/2026 at 4:20 PM

    Will be passing this along to a few people who would benefit from the perspective shared here, and a stop at thrivenet only added to what I will be sharing, this kind of generous content deserves to circulate widely rather than getting buried in some search engine algorithm tweak that pushes it down the rankings.

  • Josephcog · 08/21/2026 at 4:20 PM

    ???????????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ????????, ? ?? ?? ?????????????? ??????? ??? ???? ???????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – [url=https://4.kapelnica-ot-zapoya-moskva0.ru/]kapelnica-ot-zapoya-na-domu-stoimost[/url]

  • StevieIncox · 08/21/2026 at 4:20 PM

    While navigating the dynamic universe concerning online gambling sites, players often desire a reliable thor fortune review to understand what sets this operator excel among competitors. Navigating thorfortune online casino https://thorfortune-casino-333.pages.dev/ options reveals a varied library of immersive slots as well as live casino tables tailored for today’s users. Lots of gamers appreciate the streamlined design of thorfortune casino, which ensures fluid navigation whether gambling via desktop plus handheld devices. A thorough thorfortune evaluation emphasizes competitive bonuses, safe banking methods, plus efficient support team which together enhance the player experience. For players evaluating where to register there, reading a detailed thor fortune casino review will deliver important insights into payout speeds along with wagering rules. Consequently, engaging with a reliable thorfortune online casino requires balancing gaming fun with safe gambling habits, turning websites like casino thorfortune popular choices among discerning digital gaming enthusiasts hunting for reliable along with engaging gaming options today. [url=https://3eqary.com/10-things-your-competitors-can-teach-you-about-real-estate/#comment-37914]In-Depth Thorfortune Casino Overview and Online Gaming Insights[/url] [url=https://stvincentiusgp.org/2025/01/27/sukacita-hut-paroki-ke-3/#comment-114692]Comprehensive Thor Fortune Review and Platform Analysis[/url] d1c68e7

  • PrestonPoorn · 08/21/2026 at 4:22 PM

    The tone stayed consistent across the whole post which is harder than it looks for longer pieces, and a look at traveltrolley continued the same voice, this kind of editorial consistency is a sign of either a single careful writer or a tightly run team and either is impressive today across the broader media environment.

  • SandyTrott · 08/21/2026 at 4:26 PM

    Now recognising the editorial wisdom of letting some questions remain open at the end, and a look at reachrun continued that intellectual honesty, content that does not force closure on contested questions is content that respects the limits of knowledge and this site has clearly developed the maturity to know when to leave space.

  • Vivod iz zapoya v stacionare_daKl · 08/21/2026 at 4:28 PM

    ?????? — ??????? ? ?????. ?????? ?? ??????? — ????????? ??????????????. ??????, ??? ???? ??????? ???????. ???????????, ???????? ???????????????? ?????????. ?????????? ????????. ?????????? ? ????????? — ????????? ? ??????????. ???????? ? ???????????????. ???? ????????????????. ????? ?? ????? ????????? [url=https://narkolog.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-stacionare-samara12.ru]????? ?? ????? ?????????[/url] ??? ???????? ? ????. ????????? ?? ???? — ??????? ???????. ??????? ???????? ? ????. ? ??????? — ? ??????????. ?????????? ?????. ???????? — ??? ???????. ???, ??? ? ????? ???????? — ???????. ????? ???? ??????!

  • JettSanna · 08/21/2026 at 4:28 PM

    Closed it feeling slightly more competent in the topic than I started, and a stop at nauticalnook reinforced that competence boost, real learning is rare in casual online reading but it does happen sometimes and this site managed to make it happen for me today which is genuinely worth pausing to acknowledge.

  • aviator_jcpt · 08/21/2026 at 4:29 PM

    aviator ???? ????? [url=https://aviator86613.icu]https://aviator86613.icu[/url]

  • Josephcog · 08/21/2026 at 4:31 PM

    ?????? ???????? ????????? ??????????, ????????? ????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ??????? ?????????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – [url=https://4.kapelnica-ot-zapoya-moskva0.ru/]?????????? ?? ????? ???? ??????[/url]

1 … 3,379 3,380 3,381 3,382 3,383

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives

To top