Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

152,054 Comments · Posted by beerorkid in lincoln, political

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

152,054 comments

  • Riverlus · 08/02/2026 at 8:45 AM

    Took the time to read the comments on this post too and they were also worth reading, and a stop at pgmbconsultancy suggested the community quality matches the content quality, when the conversation around a piece is as good as the piece itself you know you have found a real corner of the internet.

  • LeonardEreda · 08/02/2026 at 8:47 AM

    Now noticing that the post never raised its voice even when making a strong point, and a look at raspinakala continued that calm volume, content that can make important points without resorting to typographic emphasis or emotional appeal is content that trusts its substance to do the work and this site has that confidence consistently.

  • Stevebunty · 08/02/2026 at 8:48 AM

    Probably the kind of site that should be more widely read than it appears to be, and a look at realherschel reinforced that quiet wish, the gap between a sites quality and its apparent reach is sometimes large and that gap exists for this site in a way that makes me want to mention it more.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_akMl · 08/02/2026 at 8:49 AM

    ???????, ????? ???? ?? ??????? ?? ??????? ???? ???????? ? ???????? ?????? ??????? ??????, ???????????? ??? ???????? ?? ????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???????? ? ????????? ???????? ????? 40 ????? ? ?????, ??????? ? ???? ??? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ????? [url=https://narkolog.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-ghi.ru]????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????[/url] ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ???????? ????? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • RickyMer · 08/02/2026 at 8:49 AM

    Now recognising that the post handled the topic with appropriate technical precision without becoming dry, and a stop at wolfsmethanepromise continued that balance, technical precision and readability are often in tension and this site has clearly figured out how to maintain both at once which is one of the harder editorial achievements in the form.

  • RyderLog · 08/02/2026 at 8:50 AM

    On reflection this is the kind of writing that improves my taste for what is possible in the format, and a look at torivoline continued raising that bar, content that elevates my expectations rather than lowering them is doing important work in calibrating my standards and this site is participating in that elevation reliably.

  • RaulKen · 08/02/2026 at 8:50 AM

    Glad the writer kept this short rather than padding it out, the points stand on their own without needing extra context, and a look at pelixoline kept the same approach going, brevity is a sign of confidence in the substance and the team here clearly trusts their content to land without filler.

  • Noellex · 08/02/2026 at 8:50 AM

    Speaking honestly this is among the better discoveries of my recent browsing, and a stop at xelarionet reinforced that discovery quality, the ranking of recent discoveries is informal but meaningful and this site has placed near the top of that ranking based on the consistency of quality across what I have already read carefully.

  • RichardCer · 08/02/2026 at 8:52 AM

    https://dneproves.com.ua/

  • LeonardEreda · 08/02/2026 at 8:53 AM

    Useful enough to recommend to several people I know who would appreciate it, and a stop at raspinakala added more material I will pass along too, the kind of writing that earns word of mouth is the kind that actually delivers on its promises which is what this site does without any drama or fanfare attached.

  • Nathanielurino · 08/02/2026 at 8:53 AM

    Honestly enjoyed reading this more than I expected to when I first clicked through, and a stop at yaveroline kept that pleasant surprise going, sometimes you stumble onto a site that just clicks with how you like to read and this is one of those for me right now today which is great.

  • Garrettslole · 08/02/2026 at 8:54 AM

    Thanks for laying this out in a way that someone newer to the topic can follow, and a stop at kaviontrustee kept that accessibility going, writing that meets readers at different experience levels without condescending is hard to do well and the writers here have clearly thought about who they are writing for.

  • aviator_mmOt · 08/02/2026 at 8:55 AM

    aviator ??? aviator [url=aviator74854.icu]aviator74854.icu[/url]

  • aviator_evOt · 08/02/2026 at 8:58 AM

    aviator ??????? [url=http://aviator74854.icu/]http://aviator74854.icu/[/url]

  • ThomasapomA · 08/02/2026 at 8:58 AM

    ?????????? ????????? ???????? — ??? ???????, ???????????? ?? ?????????? ???? ??? ???????? ?? ????? ? ????????? ??????, ????????? ? ???????? ? ???????, ??? ????????????? ?????????? ?? ????? ??? ???????? ???? ???????.
    https://randx-super.ru/

  • chicken-road_szEn · 08/02/2026 at 8:58 AM

    chicken road chat español [url=http://chicken-road76505.icu/]http://chicken-road76505.icu/[/url]

  • LeonardEreda · 08/02/2026 at 8:58 AM

    Really thankful for posts that respect a reader’s time, this one does, and a quick look at raspinakala was the same, no need to scroll through endless intros just to get to the actual content, that approach alone is enough reason to come back here regularly for the kind of writing offered.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_enPa · 08/02/2026 at 8:59 AM

    ???? ???????? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ?????? ? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?? ???? ??????, ???????????? ??? ???????? ?? ????? — ????????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????????? ????????? ?????????? ? ???????????????? ????????? ? ?????, ?? ????????? ???????? — ????????? ????? ?? ????? [url=https://lechenie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-jkl.ru]????????? ????? ?? ?????[/url] ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • single_aeer · 08/02/2026 at 8:59 AM

    Right — been using this thing for about five months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so thought I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me last week. Am UK based, generally stick to footie and the horses, a fiver here and there, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    The reason I started using it was honestly a bit daft — I never could work out what an each way payout actually came to once you get five places instead of three. I’d just wing it and moan when the payout landed. These days I punch the numbers in first, every time, even a simple single bet.

    The single bet calculator tool is the one I’m on daily — you drop in the price and your stake and it spits out profit and total return with no faffing, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. There’s also the bigger stuff — trebles maths, lucky 15s, yankees, honestly that’s where most people I know lose track. Have a go yourself, it’s over at [url=https://single-calculator.com/bet-calculator/trixie]free trixie bet calculator[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    The thing that genuinely shifted things for me is the geekier extras. They’ve got an odds-to-probability converter that shows how much the bookie’s taking, plus a kelly criterion tool — I use half kelly since full stakes are terrifying. The dutching one gets used a fair bit for when I’m splitting a race.

    Couple of gripes. Its layout looks very functional, let’s say — zero flash, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it works but the lucky 63 breakdown are a squeeze. Also there’s nothing on the app store, it’s browser only — fine by me but worth saying.

    Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, no ads shoved in your face, does what it says. If you even now adds it up in their head, have a look — it’s saved me plenty of dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  • ThomasapomA · 08/02/2026 at 8:59 AM

    ????????????? ???? — ??? ???????, ???????????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ??? ?????? ????????? ? ????????? ??????, ????????? ? ????????? ??????, ??? ???????????? ??????? ?? ????? ??? ???????? ???? ???????.
    https://randx-super.ru/

  • aviator_qoOt · 08/02/2026 at 9:00 AM

    aviator ???????? ??????? [url=http://aviator74854.icu]http://aviator74854.icu[/url]

  • Garrettslole · 08/02/2026 at 9:02 AM

    A piece that reads like it was written for me without claiming to be written for me, and a look at kaviontrustee produced the same fit, when the writer audience match clicks naturally without being engineered through demographic targeting you know the writing is solid and this site has that natural fit consistently for me.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_dpPa · 08/02/2026 at 9:02 AM

    ???????, ????? ???? ?? ??????? ?? ??????? ???? ? ???????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?? ???? ??????, ?????? ??? ??????? ?????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ????????? ?????????? ? ???????????????? ????????? ? ?????, ????? ????? ????????? — ????? ???? ?? ??? [url=https://lechenie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-jkl.ru]https://lechenie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-jkl.ru[/url] ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • aviator_bxOt · 08/02/2026 at 9:03 AM

    aviator ?? ??????????? [url=aviator74854.icu]aviator ?? ???????????[/url]

  • Alvinlix · 08/02/2026 at 9:03 AM

    Liked everything about the experience, from the opening through to the closing notes, and a stop at xevirobonding extended that into more pages, finding a site where the editorial vision shows through every choice rather than feeling random is an increasingly rare experience and one I am glad to have today during this particular reading session.

  • LarryNoure · 08/02/2026 at 9:04 AM

    ? ???? ?????????? ?? ????????? ??? ???????????? ?? ?????????? ?? ???????????? ? ????????? ??????????????. ?? ??????? ?????? ??????????? ????????? ? ???????? ????????????. ??? ?????? ??????? ????? ????????? ? ?????????? ????? ? ????? ?? ???? ?????????????.
    ???? ????? ?????? – [url=https://medcover.ru/stati/metody-profilaktiki-alkogolizma.html]???????????? ???????????[/url]

  • 1win_pgkt · 08/02/2026 at 9:04 AM

    1win ?????? ????? [url=http://1win22751.shop/]1win ?????? ?????[/url]

  • 1win_uqSn · 08/02/2026 at 9:04 AM

    1win ??????? ????? android [url=https://1win48485.icu]https://1win48485.icu[/url]

  • Colelob · 08/02/2026 at 9:06 AM

    Walked away in a slightly better mood than when I started reading, that says something about the writing, and a stop at strategicbusinessalliances kept that going, content that leaves you feeling more capable rather than overwhelmed is the kind I keep coming back to again and again over the years and across many topics.

  • Royloyak · 08/02/2026 at 9:06 AM

    Reading this on a slow Sunday and finding it perfectly suited to a slow Sunday read, and a quick stop at ForumInvestMali kept the same gentle pace, content that fits the mood of the moment is something I notice and remember and this site has the kind of pace that suits relaxed reading sessions especially well.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_rbPa · 08/02/2026 at 9:06 AM

    ???????? ??? ??????????? ??? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ?????? ? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?? ???? ??????, ????? ???????? ? ????????? ??????? — ????????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????????? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ?????? ? ???? ? ?????, ??? ???? ?? ?????? — ????????? ?? ????? ?? ???? [url=https://lechenie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-jkl.ru]????????? ?? ????? ?? ????[/url] ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ???????? ????? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • 888starz_xamr · 08/02/2026 at 9:07 AM

    Vengo jugando como cinco meses con 888starz y para que mentir tenia dudas al principio, porque en Espana uno se cansa de sitios que se caen cada dos por tres. Abrir la cuenta fue cosa de un rato minimo, correo y contrasena y ya esta, y el minimo para depositar ronda los unos pocos euros, que para probar viene de lujo.

    De slots tienen un catalogo enorme — creo que pasan de unos 10.000 titulos entre Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, Play’n GO, Betsoft y Yggdrasil. Mis habituales son Gates of Olympus y Sweet Bonanza, aunque tambien le he dado a cosas de Big Time Gaming. La pega es que el filtro por proveedor a veces se atasca cuando el catalogo es tan bestia.

    El casino en directo es de Evolution, basicamente y se nota la diferencia: ruletas con crupieres de verdad, los game shows tipo Crazy Time que enganchan una barbaridad. La oferta de entrada es de un 100% con 100 tiradas gratis, el wagering esta en x35, que no es regalado pero tampoco un robo. Va rotando bonos sin deposito de vez en cuando, puedes mirar los terminos actualizados desde [url=https://888starz-es8.com/games]888starz crash[/url] antes de registrarte.

    Los cobros me ha ido mejor de lo que pensaba. Retire hace poco por Skrill y lo tuve en 40 minutos. Con Visa se va a dos o tres dias, eso ya es cosa del banco. Aceptan tambien Neteller, Bitcoin que es lo mas rapido con diferencia.

    Desde el movil va suave, tienen app para Android pero yo uso el navegador y me sobra. El soporte esta en espanol, no fue instantaneo pero tampoco eterno con una duda de documentacion. Operan con licencia de Curazao, asi que no es un.es regulado y hay que saberlo antes de entrar. Por ahora no me ha fallado, aunque las promos hay que leerlas con lupa.

  • 1win_xykt · 08/02/2026 at 9:09 AM

    1win ????? [url=www.1win22751.shop]1win ?????[/url]

  • chicken-road_tbEn · 08/02/2026 at 9:10 AM

    chicken road metodos de pago [url=http://chicken-road76505.icu]chicken road metodos de pago[/url]

  • TraceAgino · 08/02/2026 at 9:10 AM

    A clear case of writing that does not try to do too much in one post, and a look at GetBranDalIsm maintained the same scoped discipline, posts that try to cover too much end up covering nothing well and this site has clearly chosen scope discipline as a core editorial principle which shows up clearly in what I read.

  • Trentontip · 08/02/2026 at 9:10 AM

    Probably the kind of site that should be more widely read than it appears to be, and a look at xelarionix reinforced that quiet wish, the gap between a sites quality and its apparent reach is sometimes large and that gap exists for this site in a way that makes me want to mention it more.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_igPa · 08/02/2026 at 9:10 AM

    ??????, ???? ?????? ???? ????? ???????? ???? ? ???????? ???????? ?? ???????? ??????, ?????? ??? ??????? ?????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? ????????? ????????? ?????????? ? ???????????????? ????????? ? ?????, ??? ???? ?? ?????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ????????????? [url=https://lechenie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-jkl.ru]????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ?????????????[/url] ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • ThomasapomA · 08/02/2026 at 9:10 AM

    ?????????? ???????? — ??? ????????, ??????????????? ?? ??????????? ???? ??? ??????? ?????????? ? ????????? ????????????? ???????, ????????????? ? ????????? ??????, ??? ????????????? ??????? ?? ????? ??? ??????? ??????? ???????.
    https://randx-super.ru/

  • Enriqueraita · 08/02/2026 at 9:11 AM

    Reading this in the morning set a good tone for the day, and a quick visit to cavarotrustco kept that good tone going, content can do that sometimes when it hits the right notes and finding sites that consistently strike that tone is something I have learned to recognise and reward with regular visits.

  • Marcusvor · 08/02/2026 at 9:11 AM

    Genuinely good work, the kind that holds up over multiple readings without losing its appeal, and a stop at vexarounity kept that going, definitely a site I will be returning to and probably mentioning to others who work in or care about this particular area of interest today and in coming weeks.

  • PierreseT · 08/02/2026 at 9:11 AM

    Reading this prompted me to send the link to two different people for two different reasons, and a stop at mivarotrustco provided ammunition for a third share, content that suits multiple audiences without being generic enough to be useless to any of them is genuinely valuable and this site has that multi audience quality clearly.

  • RaulKen · 08/02/2026 at 9:13 AM

    Grateful for posts like this one, they remind me there are still places online run by people who care about quality, and a look at pelixoline reflected the same standards, you can tell the difference between content made for readers and content made just for search engines today and this is the former.

  • DemarcusCremy · 08/02/2026 at 9:19 AM

    Thanks for keeping things clear and to the point, that is honestly hard to find online these days, and after reading through Paws21AirbrushStudio the message stayed consistent which makes me trust the information being shared more than I usually do on similar pages that cover this same kind of topic.

  • 1win_ulkt · 08/02/2026 at 9:19 AM

    1win ?????? ???????? [url=https://1win22751.shop]1win ?????? ????????[/url]

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_ioPa · 08/02/2026 at 9:19 AM

    ???????? ??? ??????????? ???????? ??????????? ???? ? ???????? ? ???????? ?????? ??????? ??????, ????? ???????? ? ????????? ??????? — ????? ?? ????? ?????? ? ?????? ????? ????? ? ??????????????? ????????? ? ?????, ?? ????????? ???????? — ??????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? [url=https://lechenie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-jkl.ru]??????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ????[/url] ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • TraceAgino · 08/02/2026 at 9:20 AM

    However casually I came to this site I have ended up reading carefully, and a look at GetBranDalIsm continued earning that careful reading, the conversion from casual visitor to careful reader is something content earns rather than demands and this site has accomplished that conversion for me over the course of just a few pieces.

  • Jameskef · 08/02/2026 at 9:20 AM

    ???????????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ????????, ? ?? ?? ?????????????? ??????? ??? ???? ???????.
    ??????? ?????? ?????? – [url=https://kapelnica-ot-zapoya-v-moskve14.ru/]??? ?????? ? ?????????? ?? ?????[/url]

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_sgPa · 08/02/2026 at 9:20 AM

    ???? ???????? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ???? ? ???????? ???????? ?? ???????? ??????, ????? ???????? ? ????????? ??????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???????? ? ????????? ????? ????? ? ??????????????? ????????? ? ?????, ??? ???? ?? ?????? — ??????? ?? ????? ?????? [url=https://lechenie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-jkl.ru]??????? ?? ????? ??????[/url] ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ???????? ????? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • Trentontip · 08/02/2026 at 9:20 AM

    Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at xelarionix continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.

  • BartHew · 08/02/2026 at 9:20 AM

    Now I want to find more sites like this but I suspect they are rare, and a look at jackyunits extended that thought, the few sites that meet this quality bar are precious specifically because they are rare and finding others like them is one of the ongoing projects of careful internet curation across the years.

1 … 3,006 3,007 3,008 3,009 3,010 … 3,042

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives

To top