Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

151,969 Comments · Posted by beerorkid in lincoln, political

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

151,969 comments

  • chicken-road_kxEn · 08/02/2026 at 5:49 AM

    chicken road apk ultima version [url=https://chicken-road76505.icu/]https://chicken-road76505.icu/[/url]

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_nlOn · 08/02/2026 at 5:49 AM

    ???? ?????????? ??? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ?????? ? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?? ???? ??????, ?????? ??? ??????? ?????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ? ?????-?????????? ???????? ???????? ????? 40 ????? ? ?????, ????? ????? ????????? — ????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ??? [url=https://czena.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-sankt-peterburg-zqe.ru]https://czena.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-sankt-peterburg-zqe.ru[/url] ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • NicoKap · 08/02/2026 at 5:49 AM

    Will share this on a forum I am part of where it will be appreciated by others working in the same area, and a look at thebattlebeginsmerchandise suggests there is more here worth passing along too, definitely a generous resource that deserves a wider audience than it probably has today across the open internet.

  • single_xder · 08/02/2026 at 5:51 AM

    Right — been on this thing for something like four months now and I keep coming back, so figured I’d chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me the other day. Am based in the UK, mainly bet football and racing, nothing mad, so take it how you like.

    The reason I started using it was actually pretty stupid — I never could figure out what an e/w payout actually was once you get five places instead of three. Basically I’d guess and get a shock. Now I type the odds in before every slip, even a simple single bet.

    The single bet calculator is the bit I’m on daily — type in your stake, the odds and you get returns with no faffing, either odds format. There’s also the multiples — doubles and trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, which is where most people I know lose track. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here [url=https://single-calculator.com/bet-calculator/lucky-63]bet calculator lucky 63[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    What genuinely made a difference were the more serious tools. There’s an probability calculator which shows you the overround, and a kelly staking tool — I run quarter kelly because full kelly is a quick route to a dead bankroll. The dutch tool is decent when I’m spreading across selections.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its design feels very functional, let’s say — no flash, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it’s usable but the bigger tables make you pinch and zoom. And no proper app, just the site — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    So yeah. Free, barely any ads, does the job. If you still works out returns on a calculator app, try it — it’s saved me a load of dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  • Noellex · 08/02/2026 at 5:52 AM

    Probably one of the more reliable sources I have found for this kind of careful coverage, and a look at xelarionet reinforced the reliability, the small group of sources I would describe as reliable for a given topic is curated carefully and this site has earned a place in that small group through consistent performance.

  • Germaninich · 08/02/2026 at 5:53 AM

    Comfortable read, finished it without realising how much time had passed, and a look at SaveAustinNeighborhoods pulled me into more pages the same way, the absence of friction in good content lets time disappear and that is one of the highest compliments I can pay any piece of writing I find online during a regular search session.

  • Russellexigh · 08/02/2026 at 5:54 AM

    Now recognising the post as a rare example of careful writing on a topic that mostly receives careless treatment, and a stop at xalirobond extended that contrast with the average elsewhere, content that highlights how much the average is settling for low quality is content that has both internal merit and external value as a benchmark.

  • Stuartcossy · 08/02/2026 at 5:55 AM

    Probably worth setting aside a longer block to read more carefully than I can right now, and a stop at zavirotrustline confirmed the longer block plan, the impulse to schedule dedicated time for a sites archive is itself a measure of trust and this site has earned that scheduling impulse from me clearly today actually.

  • YaleDoM · 08/02/2026 at 5:55 AM

    This one is staying open in a tab for the rest of the day so I can come back and re read certain parts, and a look at natasharosemills suggests I will be doing the same with a few more pages here too, this is going to be a deep dive over the coming hours.

  • chicken-road_nqEn · 08/02/2026 at 5:56 AM

    chicken road subir documentos [url=https://www.chicken-road76505.icu]chicken road subir documentos[/url]

  • Daltonsloli · 08/02/2026 at 5:58 AM

    Worth saying that the prose reads naturally without straining for style, and a stop at TheSandiegoLeague maintained the same unforced quality, writing that achieves elegance without effort is the highest tier and this site has clearly worked out how to land that effortless quality consistently rather than only on the writers best days.

  • aviator_uuOt · 08/02/2026 at 5:58 AM

    aviator ??? ???? [url=aviator74854.icu]aviator74854.icu[/url]

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_nner · 08/02/2026 at 5:59 AM

    ???? ???????? ??????? ???? ?? ??????? ?? ??????? ???? ? ???????? ???????? ?? ???????? ??????, ???????????? ??? ???????? ?? ????? — ??????? ?? ????? ????? ????????? ?????????? ????? ????? ? ??????????????? ????????? ? ?????, ????? ????? ????????? — ????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ???? [url=https://kodirovanie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-sankt-peterburg-rpl.ru]https://kodirovanie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-sankt-peterburg-rpl.ru[/url] ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ???????? ????? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • Luisopick · 08/02/2026 at 6:00 AM

    Picked something concrete from the post that I will use immediately, and a look at qorivobonding added another concrete piece, content that produces immediately useful output rather than just abstract appreciation is content that earns its place in my regular rotation without needing any further evaluation from me at this point honestly.

  • NicoKap · 08/02/2026 at 6:00 AM

    Bookmark earned and folder updated to track this site separately, and a look at thebattlebeginsmerchandise confirmed the folder upgrade was the right call, organising my reading list so that good sites do not get lost in a sea of casual bookmarks is something I do more carefully now and this site warranted its own spot.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_gfer · 08/02/2026 at 6:00 AM

    ?????, ???? ?????? ???? ????? ???????? ???? ???????? ? ???????? ?????? ??????? ??????, ???????????? ??? ???????? ?? ????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ? ?????-?????????? ???????? ???????? ????? 40 ????? ? ?????, ????? ????? ????????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? ??? [url=https://kodirovanie.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-sankt-peterburg-rpl.ru]????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? ???[/url] ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ???????? ????? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • single_hser · 08/02/2026 at 6:00 AM

    Right — been on this thing for maybe a few months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, reckon I’d say something since a mate asked me a few days back. Am in the UK, mostly do football and horses, nothing mad, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    What got me on it was actually pretty stupid — I never could work out what an each way payout actually was with 1/5 odds a place. I used to just wing it and moan when the payout landed. These days I type the odds in first, every time, even the boring singles.

    The single bet calculator is the part I use most — type in the price and your stake and it shows profit and total return with no faffing, fractions or decimals. It also handles the multiples — doubles and trebles returns, a lucky 15, yankees, and that’s where most people I know got it wrong. If you want a look, it’s here [url=https://single-calculator.com]each way single bet calculator[/url] — free, no signup.

    One thing that actually shifted things for me is the geekier extras. There’s an implied probability thing which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, and there’s the kelly staking tool — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are far too aggressive. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit if I’m splitting a race.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its interface looks a bit basic — not much frills, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On my phone it works though the acca grid are a squeeze. And no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — fine by me but you asked.

    Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, barely any ads, does what it says. Anyone who even now works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — saved me plenty of arguments with the bookie.

  • chicken-road_nkEn · 08/02/2026 at 6:03 AM

    chicken road retiro rapido españa [url=www.chicken-road76505.icu]www.chicken-road76505.icu[/url]

  • Stuartcossy · 08/02/2026 at 6:03 AM

    Now realising the post has been quietly doing important work in my mind for the past hour, and a stop at zavirotrustline extended that quiet processing, content that continues to do work after I close the tab is content with afterlife in the mind and this site is producing those long lived effects at a meaningful rate.

  • Rafaelnag · 08/02/2026 at 6:03 AM

    Worth recommending broadly to anyone who reads on the topic, and a look at alexanderbuonointl only confirms that, the rare combination of accessibility and depth in this site makes it suitable for both newcomers and people who already know the area which is hard to pull off in any blog format today and rarely managed.

  • BartHew · 08/02/2026 at 6:04 AM

    Thanks for the clean writing, no broken sentences and no awkward translations like some other sites have, and a quick stop at jackyunits kept that polish going nicely, it really does make a difference when a reader can move through a page without tripping on every line or going back to reread.

  • Rogergag · 08/02/2026 at 6:05 AM

    During the time spent here I noticed the absence of the usual distractions, and a stop at robinshuteracing extended that distraction free experience, content that does not fight my attention with pop ups and modals and aggressive prompts is content that respects me and this site has clearly chosen the respectful approach throughout.

  • RayJes · 08/02/2026 at 6:05 AM

    Looking at this from the perspective of someone tired of generic content the contrast is striking, and a look at kruisefest maintained that distinctive feel, sites with strong editorial identity stand out against the bland background of algorithmic content and this one has clearly developed an identity worth recognising through careful attention.

  • single_jser · 08/02/2026 at 6:06 AM

    OK — have been messing about with this thing for maybe a few months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, reckon I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me the other day. Am based in the UK, mostly do football and horses, nothing mad, so take it how you like.

    How I found it was genuinely pretty stupid — I never could figure out what an e/w return actually was when the place terms changed. I’d just eyeball it and then be surprised. These days I type the odds in before every slip, even a straight one-selection punt.

    The single bet calculator is the bit I open most — you put in stake and odds and it shows returns with no faffing, either odds format. Same tool covers the fiddly ones — acca and treble returns, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, and that’s where I’d always lose track. If you want a look, it’s here [url=https://single-calculator.com/bet-calculator/super-heinz]free heinz bet calculator[/url] — free, no signup.

    The thing that actually made a difference was the geekier extras. They’ve got an odds-to-probability thing and it makes obvious how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly tool — I stick to fractional kelly because full kelly is far too aggressive. Dutching calculator is handy too for when I’m spreading across selections.

    Couple of gripes. Its design is very functional, let’s say — zero frills, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it’s usable though the lucky 63 breakdown make you pinch and zoom. And no proper app, it’s browser only — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    Anyway. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, works. If anyone honestly works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — saved me a load of arguments with the bookie.

  • BorisboM · 08/02/2026 at 6:06 AM

    Reading this between meetings turned out to be the most useful thing I did all afternoon, and a stop at blpawards kept that productivity feeling going, content can sometimes outperform actual work in terms of what gets accomplished mentally and this site managed that today which is genuinely a high bar to clear consistently.

  • 1win_okSn · 08/02/2026 at 6:07 AM

    1??? ?????? [url=1win48485.icu]1win48485.icu[/url]

  • Henryjag · 08/02/2026 at 6:08 AM

    ?????? ????????? ????? ? ????????? ? ??????????, ?????????? ? ????????????????? ???????.
    ????????? – [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-stacionare-v-moskve14.ru/]????? ?? ????? ? ??????? ??????[/url]

  • Kaseyreils · 08/02/2026 at 6:09 AM

    ?????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ???????? ? ????? ????????????, ????????? ?????? ?????????? ??????? ? ???????? ????????????? ????????. ? ????? ???????? ??????? ?????? ??????? — ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ? ???????? ????????? ???????. ???????????????? ?????????? ?? ????? ? ?????? — ??? ??????????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ????? ?? ????????, ???????????? ?????-????????????? ?????? ? ??????????????? ????????? ????????. ? ??????? ?? ??????????????? ???????, ??????????? ?????????? ????????? ???????? ??????????? ???????, ???????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ???????. ????????? ? ??????? ???????????? ????? ??????? ??????????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ?????? ?????????, ?? ? ???????????? ??????????? ??????? ? ?????? ????????, ????? ??????????? ? ??????? ??????????? ??????????? ??????, ????? ? ????????-?????????? ???????. ?? ?????????? ?????? ????????????????? ?????????, ? ????????????? ?????? ???????? ??????????, ??? ????? ?????????? ????????????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ? ??????? ?????. ??? ????????????? ???? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ? ???????? ?? ????? ??????? ? ??????? ???????????.
    ??????????? ????? – [url=https://kapelnica-ot-zapoya-v-moskve14-3.ru/]?????????? ?? ????? ???? ??????[/url]

  • Stevebunty · 08/02/2026 at 6:09 AM

    A piece that read as the work of someone who reads carefully themselves, and a look at realherschel continued that informed feel, writers who are also serious readers produce work with a different quality and this site reads as the product of someone steeped in good writing rather than just generating content for an audience.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_egEi · 08/02/2026 at 6:09 AM

    ???????, ????? ???? ????? ???????? ???? ? ???????? ? ???????? ?????? ??????? ??????, ?????? ??? ??????? ?????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???????? ? ????????? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ?????? ? ???? ? ?????, ??? ???? ?? ?????? — ??????? ?? ????? ?????????? ?? ???? ???? [url=https://kapelnicza.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-def.ru]https://kapelnicza.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-def.ru[/url] ??????? ????? ?????? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • WilliamBoage · 08/02/2026 at 6:10 AM

    https://dekko.com.ua/

  • Patrickkiz · 08/02/2026 at 6:10 AM

    A piece that read as if the writer was thinking carefully rather than just typing fluently, and a look at getdianefarr continued that considered quality, the difference between fluent typing and careful thinking shows up in writing and this site reads as the product of thought rather than just the product of language fluency apparently.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_reMa · 08/02/2026 at 6:10 AM

    ???????, ????? ???? ?? ??????? ?? ??????? ???????????? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ???????? ?? ???????? ??????, ???????????? ??? ???????? ?? ????? — ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???????? ? ????????? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ?????? ? ???? ? ?????, ????? ????? ????????? — ?????? ?????? ?? ????? [url=https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-abc.ru]https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-abc.ru[/url] ??????? ????? ?????? ????????? ??? ??? ? ????? ?? ????????

  • Tommymop · 08/02/2026 at 6:13 AM

    Reading this in pieces during a long afternoon and finding it consistently rewarding, and a stop at xelivoline fit naturally into the same fragmented reading pattern, sites whose posts can be read in segments without losing the thread are well suited to how I actually read these days and this one is built well.

  • Daltonsloli · 08/02/2026 at 6:14 AM

    Quietly enjoying that I have found a new site to follow for the topic, and a look at TheSandiegoLeague reinforced the small pleasure of the find, the discovery of new high quality sources is one of the more durable pleasures of careful internet reading and this site has been generating that discovery pleasure at multiple points already today.

  • Stuartcossy · 08/02/2026 at 6:14 AM

    Now realising the post has been quietly doing important work in my mind for the past hour, and a stop at zavirotrustline extended that quiet processing, content that continues to do work after I close the tab is content with afterlife in the mind and this site is producing those long lived effects at a meaningful rate.

  • chicken-road_prEn · 08/02/2026 at 6:14 AM

    chicken road lucky jet casino [url=chicken-road76505.icu]chicken-road76505.icu[/url]

  • BartHew · 08/02/2026 at 6:14 AM

    Coming back to this one, definitely, and a quick visit to jackyunits only made me more sure of that, the kind of writing that makes you want to set aside time later rather than rushing through it now while distracted by everything else competing for attention on the screen today across so many tabs.

  • Russellexigh · 08/02/2026 at 6:15 AM

    Came back to this an hour later to reread a specific section, and a quick visit to xalirobond also drew a second look, content that pulls you back rather than letting you move on permanently is the kind I want to fill my browser bookmarks with in 2026 and beyond as the open internet evolves.

  • chicken-road_skEn · 08/02/2026 at 6:15 AM

    chicken road error de conexion [url=https://chicken-road76505.icu/]chicken road error de conexion[/url]

  • 1win_puSi · 08/02/2026 at 6:17 AM

    1win ?ifr? unutdum [url=https://1win01825.help/]1win ?ifr? unutdum[/url]

  • mostbet_xtor · 08/02/2026 at 6:17 AM

    mostbet aplicatie [url=https://www.mostbet57710.icu]https://www.mostbet57710.icu[/url]

  • RayJes · 08/02/2026 at 6:18 AM

    Felt the post had been quietly polished rather than aggressively styled, and a look at kruisefest confirmed the same understated polish, sites whose quality reveals itself slowly rather than announcing itself loudly are the kind I trust more deeply because the trust is not based on first impressions of marketing but actual substance.

  • LeonardEreda · 08/02/2026 at 6:18 AM

    Reading this prompted me to dig out an old reference book related to the topic, and a stop at raspinakala extended that connection to other sources, content that connects me back to my own existing knowledge rather than asking me to forget it is content with continuity and this site has that continuous quality.

  • BorisboM · 08/02/2026 at 6:18 AM

    Will be back, that is the simplest way to say it, and a quick visit to blpawards reinforced the decision, this site has earned a spot in my regular rotation alongside a few other reliable places I check when I want something genuinely informative without all the usual modern web noise getting in the way.

  • Rogergag · 08/02/2026 at 6:18 AM

    Coming back tomorrow when I can give this a proper read, the post deserves better attention than I can give right now, and a look at robinshuteracing suggests there is plenty more here that deserves the same treatment, definitely a site I will be exploring properly over the next few days when I can.

  • single_guer · 08/02/2026 at 6:18 AM

    Right — been using this thing for something like a few months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so thought I’d say something since a lad on another thread asked me last week. Am based in the UK, mostly stick to footie and the horses, a fiver here and there, for context.

    The reason I started using it was honestly pretty stupid — I could never get my head round what an e/w return actually came to when the place terms changed. I used to just eyeball it and get a shock. These days I type the odds in before I place anything, even a straight one-selection punt.

    Their single bet calculator is the bit I use most — you drop in your stake, the odds and it spits out profit and total return with no faffing, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. There’s also the multiples — doubles and trebles returns, lucky 15s, yankees, honestly that’s where most people I know mess it up. Have a go yourself, it’s over at [url=https://single-calculator.com]bet calculator uk[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    The thing that genuinely shifted things for me were the geekier tools. There’s an implied probability calculator which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly criterion tool — I stick to fractional kelly as the full version is far too aggressive. The dutching one gets used a fair bit if I’m splitting a race.

    Not all sunshine though. Its layout is very functional, let’s say — no flash, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it’s usable but the acca grid make you pinch and zoom. There’s nothing on the app store, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me but worth saying.

    Anyway. Free, no ads shoved in your face, does the job. Anyone who even now adds it up in their head, give it a go — saves me a fair few arguments with the bookie.

  • Daltonsloli · 08/02/2026 at 6:20 AM

    My time on this site has now extended past what I had budgeted, and a stop at TheSandiegoLeague keeps extending it further, content that overstays its budget in my schedule is content that has earned the extra time and this site has been earning extra time across multiple visits to the point where my schedule needs adjustment.

  • single_qyer · 08/02/2026 at 6:23 AM

    OK — have been messing about with this thing for something like four months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d say something since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. I’m UK based, mostly stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    What got me on it was genuinely a bit daft — I never could work out what an e/w return would be once you get five places instead of three. I’d just eyeball it and moan when the payout landed. Now I type the odds in before every slip, even a straight one-selection punt.

    Their single bet calculator is the one I use most — you put in your stake, the odds and you get profit and total return instantly, either odds format. It also handles the fiddly ones — trebles returns, a lucky 15, yankees, honestly that’s where I always got it wrong. Have a go yourself, it’s over at [url=https://single-calculator.com/bet-calculator/each-way]each way bet calc[/url] — free, no signup.

    The thing that actually made a difference is the nerdier bits. The implied probability calculator which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly staking calculator — I run quarter kelly as the full version is a quick route to a dead bankroll. Dutching calculator is decent when I’m covering two or three runners.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its interface is pretty plain — no polish, it’s clearly function over form. Phone-wise it’s usable although the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s nothing on the app store, just the site — slight shame just flagging it.

    So yeah. Doesn’t cost anything, no ads shoved in your face, does what it says. If anyone even now works out returns on a calculator app, have a look — it’s saved me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  • Tommymop · 08/02/2026 at 6:23 AM

    Started reading skeptically because the headline seemed overconfident, and the post earned the headline by the end, and a look at xelivoline continued that pattern of earning its claims, sites that can back up their headlines without overpromising are rare and this one has clearly developed editorial calibration on that front consistently.

1 … 3,001 3,002 3,003 3,004 3,005 … 3,040

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives

To top