Beerorkid – a bunch of useless crap |

Oct/06

13

vote guide from Phatt

PDF

other formats

the thread where this came from

I worked with Phatt, I know his leanings, and really trust him.

SCS voting guide via Phatt

FOR AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Mike Foley REPUBLICAN
Kate Witek DEMOCRAT By most accounts (aside from Heinemen’s) Witek’s been a good auditor. I like that she’s been pushing for comprehensive performance audits. Heinemen threw a chair in her office once. The fact that she’s really quite conservative doesn’t actually bother me. Unless she becomes governor in 4 or 8 years. And never, in a million year’s would I have expected this.
Kelly Renee Rosberg NEBRASKA
Steve Larrick GREEN I like voting for Greens, but not this time.

FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT ONE
Vote for ONE
Frank Landis REPUBLICAN I like Frank. I’ve had drinks with him and he’s Dave’s brother. I suspect that he doesn’t want to regulate cell phones much
Charlie Matulka DEMOCRAT I really like Charlie. He’s a decent guy who is way smarter than he let’s on. Charlie, I suspect would regulate cell phones more and lobby for lighting up LES’s dark fiber (he would have some say in this.
Frank will likely win this pretty big.

FOR COUNTY CLERK
Vote for ONE

Patricia A. Owen REPUBLICAN
Dan Nolte DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR -REGISTER OF DEEDS
Vote for ONE

Norman H. Agena REPUBLICAN I don’t own a house, but I’m not convinced that this office has been run too well. I don’t like the formula used. it’s a tough call.
Patrick Faden BY PETITION I don’t know this guy.
They’re both Republicans and really, it won’t likely matter. Agena will win.

FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER
Vote for ONE
Dennis R. Keefe DEMOCRAT X marks the spot.

County Commisioner

I can’t vote for any of them. There are no Democrats running and the Republicans running are all awful. I was going to say “especially Workman” but Deb Shorr is pretty bad, too. They’re all pretty bad in some manner.

FOR MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE
DISTRICT TWENTY-SIX

I can’t say anything about legislative races, as both my jobs make anything I say publically problematic. If any of you have any questions I can explain in private. PM me.

FOR MEMBER OF THE STATE BOARD
OF EDUCATION
DISTRICT FIVE
Vote for ONE

Patricia H. Timm
Alan Jacobsen X marks the spot. He’s a Democrat.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Five
Vote for ONE
Steve Larrick If he had an opponent (D or R), I’d still for for Steve. He’s a green.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Nine
Vote for ONE
Robert C. Andersen
Micah R. Kohles X Marks the spot.

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
Subdistrict Ten
Vote for ONE
Brennen Miller X marks the spot.
Jason Hayes

FOR DIRECTOR
LOWER PLATTE SOUTH
NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
At Large
Vote for ONE
Terry Kubicek
David M. Landis X marks the spot (Duh!).

Amendment 1: Help for nonprofit groups

The amendment would allow local government to use tax-exempt bonds to finance buildings that would then be leased or purchased by a nonprofit organization. This would allow local nonprofit agencies to take advantage of the lower interest rate of government tax-exempt bonds.

Proposed by Dave Landis. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 2: Help for Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund

This amendment would allow greater diversity in investing city public endowment funds and is intended to help Lincoln’s Community Health Endowment Fund.
Proposed by Chris Beutler. That’s all the endorsement I need.

Amendment 3: Compulsive gambling programs

This amendment would increase lottery funding to the Compulsive Gambler’s Assistance Fund from $500,000 to $1 million.

Sure.

Amendment 4: Probation and Parole

The amendment would make it easier for two agencies to work together. Now, probation employees, who work with people sentenced to specific probation requirements rather than being sent to prison or jail fall under the state court system and the judicial branch of government.

This was proposed by Kermit Brashear. I haven’t agreed with Brashear much. I think, though, this looks like a good idea. And when it comes to nuts and bolts governmental procedures, Brashear is no slouch.

Amendment 5: Early childhood education

This amendment would allow the state to use the interest from $40 million in state funds for grants to early childhood education programs. The state money would be combined with at least $20 million in private donations to create an early childhood education endowment fund.

The $40 million in state money is part of the perpetual fund for schools and the interest is divided among all public schools, based on student population.

Susan and Peter Buffett will provide at least $5 million to jumpstart the private donations for this public-private partnership.

This just seems like a great idea pretty much automatically. The fact The Western Nebraska Taxpayers Association opposes this amendment, pretty much seals the deal. Those people are nuts.

Amendment 6: Changing TIF requirements

This amendment would remove the requirement that property be substandard and blighted to qualify for special property tax financing. It would also expand the definition of what would qualify for TIF to include development, in addition to rehabilitating and redeveloping.

Again, this just makes sense on its face. Matt Connealy supports it, too. I’ve had issues with him. But when it comes to rural redevelopment in Nebraska, there are few people I trust more.

This link explains this Amendments well.

http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/10/08/local/doc4528236cbbe78108869260.txt

Initiative Measure 421
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
County and City Lottery Act to authorize
the use of video keno gaming devices.

If you like the idea of machines like those stupid video games on bars showing up more and then mix that with pickle cards, in more bars…

I hate those stupid video games on bars. My libertarian side says yes. My aesthete side says no.

Referendum ordered by Petition of the
People
Referendum Measure 422
A vote to “Retain” will retain Legislative
Bill 126 enacted in 2005 by the First
Session of the Ninety-Ninth Nebraska
Legislature, and that bill will (1) dissolve all
Class I school districts and repeal the
statutes dealing with their formation; (2)
attach Class I school districts to Class
II,III, IV and VI school districts; (3)
distribute Class I territory, assets and
liabilities (except for bonded
indebtedness); (4) prevent elementary
attendance centers for all school districts
including former Class I districts from
being closed under certain circumstances;
(5) provide for certain student
transportation requirements; and (6)
provide for aid to schools for transition
and elementary improvement.

Pretty complicated looking huh? Well, it is pretty complicated. Class 1 schools and their elimination causes a lot of people to get very upset. I don’t quite understand all of this. But if Ron Raikes and Kate Witek are on the same page of this, well… Really, it comes down to money. consolidating Class 1 school districts into larger districts will likely save a lot of money that the state spends on education. The one room schoolhouse seems nice, but it’s 2006. Vote to retain.

Proposed by Initiative Petition
Initiative Measure 423
A vote “FOR” will amend the Nebraska
Constitution to impose a state spending
limit based upon a calculation involving
previous appropriations, the inflation rate
and population change in Nebraska.
A vote “AGAINST” will not amend the
Nebraska Constitution to impose such a
state spending limit.

This is easily one of the worst pieces of legislation ever proposed in Nebraska history. I tried to post a long description as to why I think this and something ate it. Suffice to say, if you want publically funded school programs you should vote against this. This could really mess up the states budget. It’s awful and is not even inspired by a popular Nebraskan movement. It’s inspired by a guy who doesn’t live in Nebraska and could spend money to hire people to get signatures. It’s truly awful.

No tags

106,440 comments

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_lgsa · 06/26/2026 at 7:36 PM

    ?????? ????????. ????? ? ????? ?????????. ???? ???? ??? ?????????. ?????? ??? ??????. ? ????????? ????? — ?? ??? ????? ????. ??????, ???????????? ??? ??????? ??????? — ??????? ????? ?? ????? ?????????????. ???????? ????? ???. ? ?????, ??? ???????? ? ????? ? ??????? — ????? ?? ????? ????????????? [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-voronezh-ayu.ru]????? ?? ????? ?????????????[/url] ?? ??????. ????????? ???? ???? ????.

  • Coledub · 06/26/2026 at 7:42 PM

    Clean writing, easy to read, and never tries too hard to impress, that combination is harder to find than people think, and after my time on pineharborcraftcollective I am sure this site treats its readers well, no flashy tricks just useful content done right which is honestly all I want online.

  • Brentswant · 06/26/2026 at 7:43 PM

    The pacing of the post was just right, never rushed and never dragged out unnecessarily, and a look at berryharborcommercegallery maintained the same rhythm, you can tell the writer has experience because the difficult skill of pacing is something only practiced writers manage to handle well in long form content over time and across formats.

  • Thomasces · 06/26/2026 at 7:43 PM

    ??? ?????????? ????????? ??????????? ??????????? ? ??????????. ?? ???????, ??? ??????????????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????????? ???????????? ? ??????? ?????????????. ???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???????????????? ????????? ? ?????????? ??????? ???????? ? ???????.
    ??????? ????????? ?? ???? – [url=https://37dent.ru/the_articles/garmoniya-v-dome-preodolenie-stressa-i-zavisimostey-dlya-sohraneniya-krepkoy-semi.html]??????????? ????? ??????????[/url]

  • ErnestoZooke · 06/26/2026 at 7:45 PM

    Thank you for the genuine effort here, it shows in every paragraph and not just the headline, and after my visit to syrupspire I was sure this site cares about getting things right rather than chasing clicks, which is the main reason I will come back later this week to read more.

  • Ralphsmogy · 06/26/2026 at 7:48 PM

    Started reading expecting to disagree and ended mostly nodding along, and a look at shopeasestore continued the pattern, content that wins agreement through evidence and reasoning rather than rhetorical force is the kind that actually shifts minds and this site clearly knows how to do that across what I have read so far.

  • IsraelEscak · 06/26/2026 at 7:48 PM

    ? ???? ?????? ?? ????????????? ?????????????? ??????? ??????????? ?? ????? ????????. ??????????? ???????, ????? ??? ????????, ????????? ? ???????????????? ??????????. ???????? ?????? ? ????????????? ????????? ?? ??????? ? ? ????? ? ??????????????.
    ?????? — ??? ????????? – [url=https://med-express.spb.ru/kodirovanie-ot-alkogolizma-v-murmanske-metody-etapy-i-effektivnost/]? ????????? ??????? ???????????[/url]

  • GaryDusly · 06/26/2026 at 7:54 PM

    Felt mildly happier after reading, which sounds silly but is true, and a look at summitshire extended that small mood lift, content that improves rather than degrades my mental state is content I want more of and the cumulative effect of reading sites that lift versus sites that drag is real over time.

  • EliasHok · 06/26/2026 at 7:57 PM

    Liked the careful selection of which details to include and which to skip, and a stop at cargofeather reflected the same editorial judgement, knowing what to leave out is just as important as knowing what to include and this site has clearly figured out where that line sits for the topics it covers regularly.

  • Gunnerknows · 06/26/2026 at 8:02 PM

    Reading this gave me a quiet moment of intellectual pleasure that I had not been expecting, and a stop at urgesnare extended that pleasure across more pages, the unexpected reward of stumbling into careful writing is one of the small ongoing pleasures of reading the open web and this site is delivering it reliably.

  • EduardoCah · 06/26/2026 at 8:04 PM

    Closed and reopened the tab three times before finally finishing, and a stop at bayougourd held my attention straight through, sometimes content fights for time against my own distraction and the times it wins say something positive about its quality and this post clearly won that fight today afternoon for me.

  • Gregmax · 06/26/2026 at 8:04 PM

    Thanks again for the post, I learned a couple of things I can actually use later this week, and after I went over shopplusstore the rest of the site looked equally promising, definitely going to spend more time here when I get a free moment over the weekend to read more carefully.

  • AndrewTrant · 06/26/2026 at 8:06 PM

  • EliasHok · 06/26/2026 at 8:07 PM

    Even across multiple posts the writers voice has remained consistent in a way I appreciate, and a stop at cargofeather continued that voice, sites that maintain editorial consistency across many pieces have something most sites lack and this one has clearly worked out how to keep its voice steady across what reads as a growing archive.

  • Cristiannok · 06/26/2026 at 8:09 PM

    Reading this prompted me to send the link to two different people for two different reasons, and a stop at vaultvelour provided ammunition for a third share, content that suits multiple audiences without being generic enough to be useless to any of them is genuinely valuable and this site has that multi audience quality clearly.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_imKt · 06/26/2026 at 8:10 PM

    ?????? ???????? ??????. ?????????? ? ????? ?????. ??? ?????? ?????????. ???? ? ??????. ? ????????? ????? — ???? ?? ??? ?????. ??????, ?????????? ????? ??????? — ????? ?? ????? ?????? ? ???????. ?????? ?? ???????. ? ?????, ??? ???????? ? ????? — ????? ???? ?? ??? [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-def.ru]https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-def.ru[/url] ?? ????????? ?? ?????. ????????? ???? ???? ????.

  • Vivod iz zapoya na domy_cnKt · 06/26/2026 at 8:10 PM

    ????? ?????????. ????? ? ? ???????? ??????????. ??? ?????? ?????????. ?????? ?????? ? ?????. ?????? ?? ????. ??????, ?????? ??? ? ?????? — ??????? ????? ?? ????? ?????????????. ?????? ?? ???????. ? ?????, ???????? ???? ?? ?????? — ?????? ??????????? ???????????? ?? ???? [url=https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-def.ru]https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-samara-def.ru[/url] ?????? ?????? ??????. ??????? ????? ? ????.

  • EliasHok · 06/26/2026 at 8:11 PM

    The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at cargofeather kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.

  • EduardoCah · 06/26/2026 at 8:13 PM

    Honestly informative, the writer covers the ground without showing off, and a look at bayougourd reflected the same humility, content that respects the reader rather than trying to dazzle them is something I always appreciate and rarely come across in this corner of the internet today across the topics I usually read.

  • Gregmax · 06/26/2026 at 8:13 PM

    Even on a quick first read the substance of the post comes through, and a look at shopplusstore reinforced that immediate quality, content that does not require a slow careful read to demonstrate value but rewards one anyway is content with real depth and this site has produced work of that demanding depth class.

  • EliasHok · 06/26/2026 at 8:17 PM

    Appreciated how the post felt complete without overstaying its welcome, and a stop at cargofeather confirmed that economical approach runs across the site, knowing when to stop is a skill many writers never develop but here the discipline is obvious and welcome from the perspective of a busy reader trying to learn things efficiently.

  • EduardoCah · 06/26/2026 at 8:17 PM

    Honestly informative, the writer covers the ground without showing off, and a look at bayougourd reflected the same humility, content that respects the reader rather than trying to dazzle them is something I always appreciate and rarely come across in this corner of the internet today across the topics I usually read.

  • AngelaSob · 06/26/2026 at 8:17 PM

    101 ??????? ???? — ?????? ????? ? ???????. ? ????? ???????? ???????????? ?? ?????? ???????????? ???????, ?? ? ?????? ???????, ????? ????????? ? ????????? ????. 101 ???? ? ???????????? ?? ????????? ????? ? ????????? ?? ?????. ???????? ????? ?? ????? ? ????????? ? ???????? ?????? ???????! [url=https://101-roza-novosibirsk.ru]101 ???? ????????[/url]
    ?????? ?????????: https://101-roza-novosibirsk.ru
    101 ???? 90??
    101 ???? ?????? ? ????????????
    ???????? ????? 101 ????

    ???????!

  • Gregmax · 06/26/2026 at 8:18 PM

    Even on a quick first read the substance of the post comes through, and a look at shopplusstore reinforced that immediate quality, content that does not require a slow careful read to demonstrate value but rewards one anyway is content with real depth and this site has produced work of that demanding depth class.

  • Thomasfek · 06/26/2026 at 8:21 PM

    ???? ????? ???????? ?????????? ? ????????? ??????????? ? ??????? ????????. ?? ???????? ????????????? ??????????, ??????? ?????? ?????? ? ??????? ? ???????????, ? ????? ?? ??????? ?? ????????????? ???????? ??????????? ??????.
    ??????, ?? ????????? – [url=https://healbio.ru/psihiatr-na-dom-stoimost/]???????? ?? ??? ? ???????[/url]

  • BruceTwelf · 06/26/2026 at 8:22 PM

    Easy to recommend, the content speaks for itself without needing additional praise from me, and a stop at banyaneagle only adds more reasons to send people this way, the kind of generous resource that benefits its readers without demanding anything in return is increasingly rare and worth recognising clearly today across the broader open internet.

  • NedDic · 06/26/2026 at 8:22 PM

    Generally my attention drifts on long posts but this one held it through the end, and a stop at primevaluecorner earned the same sustained focus, content that defeats my drift tendency is content with substantive pulling power and this site has demonstrated that pulling power across multiple pieces in a session that has now run quite long actually.

  • EduardoCah · 06/26/2026 at 8:22 PM

    Different feel from the algorithmically optimised posts that dominate the topic, and a stop at bayougourd reinforced that human touch, you can tell when a site is being run by someone who reads what they publish versus someone just hitting submit and moving on quickly to the next assignment without checking the result.

  • Gregmax · 06/26/2026 at 8:23 PM

    Thanks again for the post, I learned a couple of things I can actually use later this week, and after I went over shopplusstore the rest of the site looked equally promising, definitely going to spend more time here when I get a free moment over the weekend to read more carefully.

  • YaleVig · 06/26/2026 at 8:24 PM

    Speaking from the perspective of a fairly demanding reader the writing here clears the bar consistently, and a look at vitalsnippet continued clearing that bar, the calibration of demanding reader is something I apply to all sources and this site has been one of the few that handles the demanding reading well across pieces sampled.

  • BruceTwelf · 06/26/2026 at 8:26 PM

    Reading this confirmed a hunch I had been carrying about the topic without having articulated it, and a stop at banyaneagle extended the confirmation, content that gives shape to fuzzy intuitions is doing the rare work of making private thoughts public and this site is providing that articulating service consistently for me lately.

  • NedDic · 06/26/2026 at 8:27 PM

    Started this morning and finished at lunch with a small sense of having spent the time well, and a look at primevaluecorner extended that satisfaction into the afternoon, content that fits naturally into the rhythm of a working day rather than demanding a dedicated reading block is increasingly the kind I prefer.

  • Cristiannok · 06/26/2026 at 8:28 PM

    If quality blog writing is dying as people sometimes claim then this site is one piece of evidence that it has not died yet, and a look at vaultvelour extended that evidence, the broader cultural question about online writing has empirical answers in specific sites and this one is contributing to a more optimistic answer overall.

  • https://Horse-Betting.com/ · 06/26/2026 at 8:32 PM

    betting for the st leger?

    my web blog – horse racing results Today At wolverhampton? (https://Horse-Betting.com/)

  • YaleVig · 06/26/2026 at 8:32 PM

    Took me back a step or two on an assumption I had been making, and a stop at vitalsnippet pushed that reconsideration further, writing that gently corrects the reader without being aggressive about it is a rare diplomatic skill and the team here clearly knows how to land critical points without turning readers off.

  • Phillipcreft · 06/26/2026 at 8:34 PM

    Started believing the writer knew the topic deeply by about the second paragraph, and a look at borealbarley reinforced that confidence, the speed at which a writer establishes credibility through their writing is a useful quality signal and this writer establishes it quickly and quietly without resorting to credential dropping or self promotion.

  • Juliomep · 06/26/2026 at 8:36 PM

    Now planning to recommend this site in a context where my recommendations are taken seriously, and a stop at shopwavemarket confirmed I should make that recommendation soon, the small but real act of recommending content into spaces where my taste matters is something I take seriously and this site is worth the recommendation.

  • YaleVig · 06/26/2026 at 8:37 PM

    Found a couple of useful angles in here I had not considered before reading carefully, and a quick stop at vitalsnippet added more, this is one of those sites where the value compounds the more you read rather than peaking at one viral post and then offering nothing else of substance afterwards which is common.

  • AndrewTrant · 06/26/2026 at 8:37 PM

  • HerbertAbsEd · 06/26/2026 at 8:37 PM

    ? ???? ?????? ?? ??????? ? ???????? ????????? ? ???????? ?????????????. ??????????????? ?????, ?????? ?????????, ??????????? ? ??????-???????, ??????? ????? ??????? ???????? ???? ? ?????????? ?? ???????????.
    ????????? – [url=https://provsetaro.ru/raznoe/kogda-gasnut-semeynye-mandaly-preodolenie-alhimicheskogo-raspada-i-perehod-ot-illyuziy-magii-k-fizicheskomu-spaseniyu]???? ???????? ?? ???[/url]

  • BrianCeale · 06/26/2026 at 8:37 PM

    Thank you for being clear and direct, that simple approach saves so much frustration on the reader’s end, and a stop at kettlecrestcraftcollective only made me more sure of it, the rest of the content seems to follow the same pattern which is a great sign of consistent editorial care behind the scenes.

  • Doriangat · 06/26/2026 at 8:37 PM

    Approaching this with the usual skepticism I bring to new sites and being slowly persuaded, and a stop at jadkix continued that gradual persuasion, the careful path from skeptical reader to genuine fan is the only one I trust and this site has walked me along that path through patient consistent quality across pieces.

  • Loretta · 06/26/2026 at 8:38 PM

    That is a great tip especially to those fresh to the blogosphere.
    Simple but very precise info? Many thanks for sharing this
    one. A must read article!

    Here is my web-site – blackjack basic strategy exceptions (Loretta)

  • AbelDulge · 06/26/2026 at 8:39 PM

    The overall feel of the post was professional without being stuffy, and a look at siskastencil kept that approachable expertise going, finding the right register for technical content is hard but this site has clearly figured out how to sound knowledgeable without slipping into that distant lecturing tone that loses readers in droves every time.

  • YaleVig · 06/26/2026 at 8:42 PM

    Now thinking about how this post will age over the coming years, and a stop at vitalsnippet suggested the same durability, content built to age well rather than to capture the attention of the moment is content with a different kind of value and this site has clearly chosen the long horizon over the short one.

  • AbelDulge · 06/26/2026 at 8:43 PM

    Skipped lunch to finish reading, which says something, and a stop at siskastencil kept me at my desk longer than planned, when content beats the lunch impulse the writer has done something genuinely impressive in an attention environment full of immediately satisfying alternatives competing for the same finite block of reader time.

  • DwightRoalo · 06/26/2026 at 8:44 PM

    ? ?????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ???????? ?? ???????? ????????? ? ???????? ?????????????. ?? ???????, ??? ??????, ????? ? ????????????? ????? ?????? ???, ??? ???????????? ? ?????????????. ???????? ??????? ???????????? ??????, ??? ???????????? ??????? ?? ???? ? ????? ?????.
    ?????????? ? ????????? – [url=https://sadovod69.ru/vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-v-murmanske-polnoe-rukovodstvo/]clinica plus ? ?????????[/url]

  • Juliomep · 06/26/2026 at 8:45 PM

    Now setting aside time on my next free afternoon to read more from the archives, and a stop at shopwavemarket confirmed that time will be well spent, the rare site whose archive deserves a dedicated reading session rather than just casual sampling is the kind of resource worth scheduling around and this one qualifies clearly.

  • DaleCoerb · 06/26/2026 at 8:46 PM

    Genuine reaction is that this site clicked with how I like to read, and a look at silverumber kept that comfortable fit going, sometimes you find a place online whose editorial decisions just align with your preferences and when that happens it is worth recognising and supporting through repeat engagement consistently going forward.

  • NedDic · 06/26/2026 at 8:46 PM

    Reading this prompted me to send the link to two different people for two different reasons, and a stop at primevaluecorner provided ammunition for a third share, content that suits multiple audiences without being generic enough to be useless to any of them is genuinely valuable and this site has that multi audience quality clearly.

1 2,124 2,125 2,126 2,127 2,128 2,129

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

About BorK

My pledge: a pic in every post, at least 5 posts a day (cept weekends), and free tiny american flags ($39.95 S&H). Seriously yall, register up and add some stupid / cool stuff here. This is a community, join into it, comment a few times and I will make you an author.

If you wanna contact me, it is "my username" @ gmail.com

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me

Archives